View Full Version : Cant do it....
Simo@work
25th March 2003, 04:29
This friggin assignment.... I just cant finish it?? I cant seem to re-arrange the friggin equation properly.. been thinking about it too much. <img src= "smileys/confused.gif">
Arse!
Simo'
GreenSaxo
25th March 2003, 04:30
let us have a go??
Dannysp8
25th March 2003, 04:31
Thats why i dont think too much, it hurts <img src= "smileys/silly.gif">
Andysaxo.
25th March 2003, 04:31
lol having a few proplems fella!?
im glad i dont have to do assignments anymore, them days r long gone! lol
simo ive put them other pics of my car up for ya under the post "more pics of my VTS" they are a lot better and u can use them for ya main site! <img src= "smileys/grin.gif">
chers andy
Scott
25th March 2003, 04:33
you thicko!! <img src= "smileys/smiley2.gif"><img src= "smileys/silly.gif">
Simo@work
25th March 2003, 04:48
<img src= "smileys/confused.gif">
I've started to type what I've completed, as I thin kI need a break from the question im stuck on... it cant be that hard?? Think i've just blinded my mind to it.. <img src= "smileys/silly.gif">
I'll post a condensed version here..
Simo'
GreenSaxo
25th March 2003, 04:49
cool..
Simo@work
25th March 2003, 05:00
No doubt, now i've condensed 25 sheets of scrawl into 5 lines, it will be easy.. <img src= "smileys/silly.gif">
Q = (M x 900) =[80 x 4.18 x (T-20)]=(U x 116.82 x L)
L =[70 (90 T) ] / [ln (70 /(90-T))]
I need to express L in terms of T cancel a few factors out of the top equation. Once simplified, I will have to calculate U from the data above
Once Ive found U, I will be able to calculate Q and T. and ultimately I will be able to calculate M
The bit im having trouble really is expressing L in terms of T, and simplifying the top equation
Once Ive done this bit, I know how to do the rest of the question.. this is just a snippet froma big mother of a calculation! <img src= "smileys/smiley3.gif">
Dannysp8
25th March 2003, 05:07
Get that to fuck.....
Andysaxo.
25th March 2003, 05:08
im with danny on this one!!! lol
cheers andy
XPT_Furio
25th March 2003, 05:09
Hmmmmm, fucked if i know! <img src= "smileys/grin.gif">
Hanny_lou
25th March 2003, 05:10
erm... wats the question-- is it econmics?
GreenSaxo
25th March 2003, 05:10
ok.. im off to bed now... if ur still stuck by 2morrow lunchtime.. i will have a go at it!!
Simo@work
25th March 2003, 05:21
LMAO... it was supposed to be handed in last Thursday.. so it'll be leaving via email in the morning, completed or not... I think? <img src= "smileys/smiley9.gif">
Simo
25th March 2003, 22:58
I've just completed the fucker... time for a beer!! <img src= "smileys/cool.gif">
Data :-
Do = 0.0254mDI = 0.0210mMCW = 80kgs-1NT = 400 tubes
6 tube-side passesLatent heat of condensing vapour = 900kJ/kg
ho = 2500 W-2K-1Inlet temp of cooling water = 20aCThermal conductivity (steel) = 50 W/mK
1/hfI = 0.0004 (Wm-2K)-11/hfo = 0.0002 (Wm-2K)-1
Firstly, a value of hI must be calculated¡K using :-
(hI DI / k) = 0.023 x [(â v DI) / Ý]0.8 x [(Cp x Ý) / k]0.33
Number of tubes = 400¡K number of passes = 6. Ì No of tubes / pass = 66.667
The cross sectional flow area / pass= 66.667 x (*/4) x 0.0212 m2
= 0.02309 m2
The volumetric flow rate is calculated as follows¡K mass flow / density
Ì volumetric flow rate = 80 kgs-1 / 1000m3kg-1=0.08m3s-1
Hence the velocity = 0.08 m3s-1 / 0.02309m2
Ì velocity = 3.46ms-1
Next, the values of Re and Pr must be calculated¡K
Re = â v DI / Ý
Ì Re = (1000 x 3.46 x 0.021 ) / 900 x 10-6
And so, the value of Re = 80733.33 and hence the Re number should be recorded¡K
Re = 8.07 x 104¡K. Ì The flow is turbulent!
The value of Pr must now be calculated¡K
Pr = (c x Ý) / kPr =(4.18 x 900x10-6) / 610 x10-6
Therefore, Pr = 4.18 x 900 x 10-6
Pr = 6.17
Then¡K using, hI = 0.023 x (k / DI) x Re 0.8 x Pr0.33)
Ì hI = 0.023 x (610 x 10-6 / 0.021) x (8.07 x 104)0.8 x (6.17)0.33
and Hence, hI = 10.26 kW/m2K
From the data tables¡K hO = 2.5 kW m-2K-1
Then¡K
1 / UO = [(1 / hI) x (DO / DI)] + [(DO ln (DO / DI)) / 2k] + (1 / hO) + [(1 / hfI) x (DO / DI)] + (1 / hfO)
where¡K (1 / hfI) = 0.0004 (W/m2K)-1and(1 / hfO) = 0.0002 (W/m2K)-1
Therefore¡K
1 / UO = [(1 / 10260) x (0.0254 / 0.0210)] + [(0.0254 ln (0.0254 / 0.0210)) / 2 x 50] + (1 / 2500) + [(0.0004) x (0.0254 / 0.0210)] + (0.0002)
Ì 1 / UO = 1.25 x 10-3 m2K / W
Ì UO = 799.98 W/m2KÌ UO = 800 W/m2K
The area of the heat exchanger can now be calculated¡K using.
AO = NT * DO LÌ AO = 400 x * x 0.0254m x 3.66m
Hence, AO = 116.82m2
Overall Heat Balance equation¡K
Q = (MV x L) = (MCW CPcw ´T)CW = (UO AO ´Tlm)
Where, L = 900kJ/kgAO = 116.82m2UO = 0.8 kWm-2K-1CPcw = 4.18 kJ kg-1K-1
MCW = 80kgs-1
Ì Q = (900 MV) = (80 x 4.18 x ´Tcw) = (0.8 x 116.82 x ´Tlm)
Ì Q = (900 MV) = (334.4 x ´Tcw) = (93.46 x ´Tlm)
Then¡K ´Tcw = (T ¡V 20)
And so¡KQ = (900 MV) = (334.4 (T-20)) = (93.46 x ´Tlm)
And´Tlm = ´T1 - ´T2 / ln(´T1 / ´T2)´T2 = (90 ¡V T)
Ì ´Tlm = 70 ¡V (90 ¡V T) / ln [70 / (90-T)]
Ì ´Tlm = (-20
Dannysp8
26th March 2003, 00:19
Yer thats what i was gona say <img src= "smileys/silly.gif">
tgazvtr
26th March 2003, 00:24
Same here <img src= "smileys/smiley4.gif"> I think that would just peck my head!<img src= "smileys/smiley5.gif">
Simo
26th March 2003, 00:33
Great stuff aint it!! <img src= "smileys/silly.gif">
Just doing the last question, then gonna email it in about 40 mins...
Thank fuck!! I can then enjoy my days off... for a change.
Simo'
tgazvtr
26th March 2003, 00:34
Is right!
Areke
26th March 2003, 12:30
I hate school, im glad im not going to school anymore!!!
vBulletin® v3.8.2, Copyright ©2000-2025, Jelsoft Enterprises Ltd.