View Full Version : Pug 106 Gti
YAYOVTR
5th March 2008, 18:39
how do you rate the 106 gti compared to the vts?
Curran
5th March 2008, 18:42
more expensive
same performance
nicer seats in the later ones and thats about it.
Jazz
5th March 2008, 18:44
more expensive
same performance
nicer seats in the later ones and thats about it.
As above:y:
YAYOVTR
5th March 2008, 18:45
i have been told that the gti is much quicker and a better drive ?
Curran
5th March 2008, 18:46
i have been told that the gti is much quicker and a better drive ?
they're basically the same car. thats a load of pish.
they have the same engine so how can it be much quicker?
ryhornvtr
5th March 2008, 18:48
GTI has a 24mm rear arb compared to a vts; 22mm one. I fitted a 24mm one to my vts and its MUCH better, so the GTI will handle better.
Gti has the nicer seats but most will say a shitter dashboard, also has shitter and smaller wheels compared to the vts.
dannygti
5th March 2008, 18:48
i prefer them, thats why i have one but they are more or less exactly the same car. the gti is more refined.
VtsTom
5th March 2008, 18:49
Ive had both seats and prefer the older ones, just because they hold you better.
120bhp in each engine, each car weighs 9800kg with the same gear box. Only difference is that the later VTS's have 15" wheels and all gti's have 14"s
ryhornvtr
5th March 2008, 18:52
120bhp in each engine, each car weighs 9800kg with the same gear box.
So thats 12.24 bhp per tonne, no wonder these cars are fast:panic:
VtsTom
5th March 2008, 18:55
May have added an extra 0 :(
rushy_23
5th March 2008, 18:55
9800kgs! Fcuk me lol.
Jazz
5th March 2008, 18:56
9800kgs! Fcuk me lol.
I didn't know our cars got fatter in their old age lol:P
Jackman
5th March 2008, 19:09
Its the same car.
Mugello
5th March 2008, 19:11
same car, but better inside and looks a tiny bit better. :)
gotamintvtr
5th March 2008, 19:12
the gti is 3seconds quicker 0-60
oh no sorry thats a lie
Mugello
5th March 2008, 19:13
the gti is 3seconds quicker 0-60
oh no sorry thats a lie
lmao :)
Pat_Vts
5th March 2008, 19:14
gti more expensive thats about it, would have VTS anyday...
Jazz
5th March 2008, 19:17
the gti is 3seconds quicker 0-60
oh no sorry thats a lie
Yeah but remember when you put on the VTS's fog lights, zoom zoom, max speed jumps to 150 easy. Well, it does if you wear a fake-burberry cap anyway...:wacko:
:P
Mugello
5th March 2008, 19:18
i would not be bothered, but seening the GTI at my college, i would say GTI all day if it looked like that one, otherwise VTS.
dannygti
5th March 2008, 19:25
lets face it the majority of owners on this site prefer the vts and if you went onto 106 owners then it would be the other way round.
personally i prefer the look of the R's and the S's to the GTI. But they are virtually the same car
Mikey
5th March 2008, 22:24
gti's look better
Jagztorious
5th March 2008, 22:27
both looks sexy to me..
Luke
5th March 2008, 22:31
Covered many of times.
carlos45
5th March 2008, 23:51
i have a saxo/106 half breed, saxo Gti ftw! ;)
lukedorritt
6th March 2008, 10:13
Gti's are rareeee, id rather have one than a Vts.
s3an
6th March 2008, 10:18
I had a 106 quiksilver and now have a vts. I prefer the way my vts looks :)
Japman
6th March 2008, 10:20
id rather the gti personally
doely_gti
6th March 2008, 10:29
gti wins on looks handsdown, same engines so speed isnt a factor
gti's are less common but the downside is they are more expensive.
TU-Tuning
6th March 2008, 11:12
Gti's are rareeee, id rather have one than a Vts.
gti wins on looks handsdown, same engines so speed isnt a factor
gti's are less common but the downside is they are more expensive.
Would agree and dissagree with that. GTis are rarer than saxos, but you don’t see many VTS’ on the road compared to GTis, most saxos are VTRs. As the S and R look the same people think the GTi is rarer. Theres about 5 VTS’ in my areas and probably 20-25 GTis. And then about a million VTRs
Japman
6th March 2008, 11:16
would disagree with ben
but each area is different
id say vts are more common that GTi's
they are in my area
Gatesy
6th March 2008, 11:17
personally, i think the gti edges it on the looks but i wouldn't be complaining with either tbh
Japman
6th March 2008, 11:20
they should have made saxos with leather i reeckon
VTR_Nick
6th March 2008, 11:26
about the same amount of GTI - VTS in my area. more VTR though definitly
doely_gti
6th March 2008, 11:34
doely has the only gti in his area. theres at least 5 saxo's tho in my street alone
:)
Jamie
6th March 2008, 11:43
What everyone has said really...
Same car engine wise,
Look similar
Same chasis?
106 has better seats
Saxo has better dash
Saxo = cheaper.
Go for a saxo and buy 106 gti interior..
GTi will be old with high milleage.. rarely see ones like rushys tbh..(newest ive seen)
Sorted.
dannybmate
6th March 2008, 14:14
vts all the way
TU-Tuning
6th March 2008, 14:15
Yeah they used to be rare as fook in my area, but theyre well common now. Same with Glanzas, Skylines, DC2s. Not as many scoobs around now though
eoey
6th March 2008, 14:33
i own 1 of about 9 saxo vts's in ireland so eh theres none around my area:cool: . nobody knows what they are it just jap cars theres more teg type r'd here than feckin mondeos
pug gti are nicer lookin altough the saxo arches are nicer
Predator_R32
6th March 2008, 14:38
SEARCH button :y:
MK2SLAG
6th March 2008, 14:44
i prefer the looks of the gti tbh
AdamH
6th March 2008, 14:45
if anything due to the interior gtis are slightly slower.. and i mean slightly.. prefer the saxo dash and looks since its more round and modern tbh.. but peugeot service is far better
Rawlinz
6th March 2008, 15:00
Saxo rear end is much nicer :)
MK2SLAG
6th March 2008, 15:01
Saxo rear end is much nicer :)
prefer the 106 as the number plate is recessed in the bumper rather than the boot
Rawlinz
6th March 2008, 15:06
It's all a matter of personal opion tbh.
But you have to admit, the VTS alloys are much nicer than the 106 ones.
vBulletin® v3.8.2, Copyright ©2000-2025, Jelsoft Enterprises Ltd.