PDA

View Full Version : differences between vtr/vts and desires


ali9evo
30th June 2008, 15:49
hi i was just wondering if any1 could tell me the differences in body work between saxo vtr/vts's and desires. also is the back wheel arch a different hieght in the desires???

thanks

djflipsaxo
1st July 2008, 07:40
ok as no1 has replied.... ill have a shot lol.

desires have flat arches, where as a vt* has curved ones.
i think the bonnets are different, as in the desire is more square??? dont quote me on that though.


get pics of both and compare.
also dunno about the back arch

VTS_86
1st July 2008, 08:57
The VT* and furio models have the sporty body like the flared arches on the front and rear. The arch shape on the desire is flat and a different shape to the other models. As far as I am aware the VT models do sit a little lower but not 100% sure. Also the VT models come with rear disc's instead of drums so the breaks are much better.

djflipsaxo
1st July 2008, 09:31
but the furio dosnt have rear disks, its drums...

VTS_86
1st July 2008, 10:22
Yeah thats right only the VT models have disks on the rear

Mr_suv
1st July 2008, 10:32
yea the arches on the rear have to be cut if you fit a vt kit to it as they hang really low on the flat arch models!

Ashleyp
1st July 2008, 10:32
The VT* and furio models have the sporty body like the flared arches on the front and rear. The arch shape on the desire is flat and a different shape to the other models. As far as I am aware the VT models do sit a little lower but not 100% sure. Also the VT models come with rear disc's instead of drums so the breaks are much better.

dont think they are lower, think its the body which makes them look that way

Quick
1st July 2008, 10:36
VT* models run a stiffer lower suspension set-up to the base models.

The basic shell is the same, but VT* front wings have holes for the clips for the kit. The rear arches are cut more than the flat arch ones.

If you check the FAQs or use the search function you will find guide to fit the kit!