PDA

View Full Version : 106 gti vs vts


Xsi16v_Jk
18th September 2008, 21:37
hi guys, was just wondering why a pug 106 gti 0-60 time is 8.4 secs and the vts is 7.6.

going by parkers this is....

is the vts much faster than the gti? or the same.

cheers :P

craig180
18th September 2008, 21:42
Parkers is wrong

kenny
18th September 2008, 21:44
never beleive what parkers say about 0-60 times. most if not all are pish.

grantley1988
18th September 2008, 21:44
never believe the figures mate. Try getting a 7.6 in a vts. i do not know how they record the 0-60 times but they are never right tbh

fossie
18th September 2008, 21:45
Iirc the 106 is lighter aint it

Xsi16v_Jk
18th September 2008, 21:46
i see, was thinking 8.4 secs is alot slower than 7.6 lol

Mochachino
18th September 2008, 21:46
the times were different, becouse the peugeot did the 0-60 with a passenger and full tank of fuel to bring the insurance down, and citroen did it with just the driver and half a tnank, along them lines :y:

Mr_suv
18th September 2008, 21:47
Iirc the 106 is lighter aint it

saxo is 15kg lighter than the 106 ! from what ive read i could be wrong tbh xx

MJRallying
18th September 2008, 21:47
Grantley we are right trouble makers!! lol There dicks atleast were best mates lol

Umm back to convo there the same engine etc lol all it that makes difference to figures is how they test there cars.

evans1089
18th September 2008, 21:47
Iirc the 106 is lighter aint it

Spot on :y:

Xsi16v_Jk
18th September 2008, 21:47
okies, thankyou fella

Tony
18th September 2008, 21:48
the times were different, becouse the peugeot did the 0-60 with a passenger and full tank of fuel to bring the insurance down, and citroen did it with just the driver and half a tnank, along them lines :y:

Dito. Take it with a pinch of salt as they are practically the same car.

Mochachino
18th September 2008, 21:48
Spot on :y:

heavier**

Azrael
18th September 2008, 21:50
this thread has been done before has it not???

Xsi16v_Jk
18th September 2008, 21:51
id say the 106 looks lighter but its obv heavier.
are they the same gearbox aswell?

grantley1988
18th September 2008, 21:52
saxo ftw tbh.... lock thread

Mochachino
18th September 2008, 21:52
id say the 106 looks lighter but its obv heavier.
are they the same gearbox aswell?


yes *yawn* they are the same car, just appearencees are different.

fossie
18th September 2008, 21:53
Stay saying lighter tho

Xsi16v_Jk
18th September 2008, 21:54
Go for it.

cheers anyways josh

fossie
18th September 2008, 21:57
106 gti = 925 kgs
Saxo VTS = 935 kgs

Mochachino
18th September 2008, 22:00
106 gti = 925 kgs
Saxo VTS = 935 kgs

gti's are 950 kg mate

fossie
18th September 2008, 22:01
The fucking shite websites...... thought i was dead clever as well.........

Azrael
18th September 2008, 22:01
id say the 106 looks lighter but its obv heavier.
are they the same gearbox aswell?

gti gearbox is a lil bit more restrictive i'm sure

ryhornvtr
18th September 2008, 22:03
gti gearbox is a lil bit more restrictive i'm sure

Wrong

Same car, different bodykit, diff interior and diff rear arb. Thats all

fossie
18th September 2008, 22:05
Fossie = Weight FAIL....... :(

Cal
19th September 2008, 00:12
I used to batter VTS's in my GTi... fucking shite they are
HAHAHAHA IM JOKING LETS SEE IF ANYONE TAKES THE BAIT

Paul
19th September 2008, 00:30
I used to batter VTS's in my GTi... fucking shite they are
HAHAHAHA IM JOKING LETS SEE IF ANYONE TAKES THE BAIT

Your not big or clever I ejoke hehe, lets see if you take the bait

Cal
19th September 2008, 00:32
Your not big or clever I ejoke hehe, lets see if you take the baitOh yeah well... erm

I took the bait hahaha

http://photos-683.ll.facebook.com/photos-ll-sf2p/v133/206/11/502092683/n502092683_124554_820.jpg

Paul
19th September 2008, 00:36
lol :detective:

Japman
19th September 2008, 01:00
same tbh