PDA

View Full Version : Saxo drag coefficient


Nij
13th January 2009, 17:06
http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Automobile_drag_coefficients

http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Drag_coefficient

gouldy87
13th January 2009, 19:00
does that mean that saxos are or arnt good aero dynamically?

Barry123
13th January 2009, 19:07
does that mean that saxos are or arnt good aero dynamically?

hatchback will never be uber aerodynamic because of steep pressure gradient on the boot as air passes over it, but as hatchbacks go they're not bad as their frontal area is relatively compact.

TU-Tuning
13th January 2009, 19:13
Holy shit, aerodynamics > handling lol

http://upload.wikimedia.org/wikipedia/commons/thumb/a/a2/Aptera_Typ-1_Wallpaper.jpg/250px-Aptera_Typ-1_Wallpaper.jpg

TU-Tuning
13th January 2009, 19:15
And the saxos is 666 :shocked:

Were all going to helllll

Nij
13th January 2009, 19:23
And the saxos is 666 :shocked:

Were all going to helllll

i wondered how long that would take someone to realise lol

TBH there very aerodynamic if you look at the others in the list.

JamesR
13th January 2009, 19:48
when i had spotlights fittedd to my front bumper, when there was anything more than a light breee you could feel the car being held back, and they where only small, amzing how such small differences can make such a big difference.

TU-Tuning
13th January 2009, 19:57
Its interesting stuff. Never thought of the Calibras as particularly streamlined but looking at em now they are pretty smooth

titchster
14th January 2009, 08:05
Drag?
http://upload.wikimedia.org/wikipedia/commons/e/ed/GM_EV.jpg
General Motors EV1, drag coefficient of 0.195
And an experimental car:
http://upload.wikimedia.org/wikipedia/commons/thumb/2/26/Nuna3atZandvoort1.JPG/800px-Nuna3atZandvoort1.JPG
Nuna, drag coefficient of 0.07
What is this drag you speak of?

Thats compared to the 106 with 0.34

Sorry, its from the other list to the Sax, not taking into account the area.

Mr_X
14th January 2009, 22:41
good reading