View Full Version : Motorist beats 98mph speeding charge
Keefo
20th January 2009, 11:00
Dunno if this has been posted here yet...
http://www.dailymail.co.uk/motoring/article-1122042/Motorist-beats-98mph-speeding-charge--buying-car-proving-manage-speed-85mph.html
djrem
20th January 2009, 11:02
hahahahhaha at 4th gear being faster than 5th:
http://i.dailymail.co.uk/i/pix/2009/01/20/article-1122042-031CBC3D000005DC-155_468x310.jpg
Jorge-
20th January 2009, 11:06
Saw this posted on Pug306, made me laugh a lot. Show the inaccuracy of the police
wallsy
20th January 2009, 11:10
haha heard that on the radio yesterday! Must have been a well good feeling proving them wrong. :P
Luke
20th January 2009, 11:12
Good for him contesting it.
steven1451
20th January 2009, 11:13
read about this yeturday thats brilliant hope he gets the compensation back
jacko87
20th January 2009, 13:41
Good for him contesting it.
Agreed, will make alot of people think about doing the same thing if they ever should get a ticket like that!
Curran
20th January 2009, 13:45
and what would have happened if he was in a car that was capable of that speed?
how would he have proved it then?
i doubt he would have been able to which is the case for most people on the road.
the police are a joke sometimes. they should have to prove you were speeding, not the other way round!
djrem
20th January 2009, 13:47
they should have to prove you were speeding, not the other way round!
Erm, I might be a bit of a retard here but I thought Speed Cameras used Radar to measure the speed of a vehicle and then took a photo.
Last time I checked, Radar was pretty accurate.
This was probably just a case of driving past a camera when a faster car over took.
Curran
20th January 2009, 13:58
Erm, I might be a bit of a retard here but I thought Speed Cameras used Radar to measure the speed of a vehicle and then took a photo.
Last time I checked, Radar was pretty accurate.
This was probably just a case of driving past a camera when a faster car over took.
you just answered your own question.
the speed reading may have been from a different car. therefore they should have to prove which car was speeding. there was 3 cars in the photo and they tried to prosecute the wrong person. hence why i said they should have to prove YOU were speeding.
Stickyjam
20th January 2009, 14:08
either im not looking in the right place but parkers reckons his beauty should be doing 106mph @ new so it appears to of lost alot of speed somewhere even if age does lower top speed....
and why didnt his mate just lend him the car :|
cause he bought it back to give it a tamper and make sure the results came out deliberately low?
dispin
20th January 2009, 14:13
nvm i read it wrong
shieldy
20th January 2009, 15:31
yeh all that bollox about how correct and accurate that they all are i bet its just when the goverment needs a little bit more money
Chewitt_VTR
21st January 2009, 12:00
He lives round the corner for me.Does anyone know where it was he got caught.
Taylor86
21st January 2009, 12:44
Just goes to show you can't trust coppers and should always contest any charges :)
craig180
21st January 2009, 12:46
Awesome! Most people would just bend over and take it
Tom5190
21st January 2009, 12:55
good on the lad i say hope he gets his compensation + more for his troubles
vBulletin® v3.8.2, Copyright ©2000-2025, Jelsoft Enterprises Ltd.