confused?!

[liammarsh]

hi saxoers :P

i am proper keen on getting a vts for a next car as it seem to be one of the best hot hatches around for a decent price.... along with the pug

i have read up on performance on both cars and well they say saxo are quicker... to be honest i thjinks that is bull same car arnt they. but i prefer the vts as its classed as 'the new nova' i used to have a nove it rocked :D

anyway getting back on to the point, why is the saxo more epensive to insure than a gti despite what they say a saxo is quicker... to be honest i think that is bull same car arnt they. but i prefer the vts as its classed as 'the new nova' i used to have a nove it rocked :D

any ideas why the real reason they are more expensive
thanks

[Ali123]

Saxos were tested with half a tank of fuel and one passenger, 106s were done with two passengers and a full tank of fuel for slightly slower 0-60 times etc for lower insurance