Jim Davidson arrested over the Jimmy savile abuse case WTF

[WheresMeNuts]

Who next & seriously surprised by this :fcuk:

He'll need more than a "Big Break" now.

[Yates]

after he wrote about it in a paper? can't see it.

met him only recently does so much for armed forces

[D1zzyman]

http://www.troll.me/images/disaster-girl/youre-next.jpg


but in all seriousness, so many people are involved in this. it seems

[stevie_m]

Looks like he's in for questioning

Jim Davidson scandal (http://www.independent.co.uk/news/uk/crime/jim-davidson-among-two-men-arrested-in-jimmy-savile-sex-abuse-probe-8435598.html)

[Yates]

says unconnected to Jimmy.

[Ross]

says unconnected to Jimmy.

This. The news this AM made a big thing about how it wasn't connected.

[e8_pqck]

Now every bint who ever got fucked and felt guilt about it will be grassing up the celebrity she threw her knickers at. It's a farce and will completely ruin my potential future sex life if i get famous. It's like one other guy said - back in the 70's they weren't asking for people's birth certificates...

[WheresMeNuts]

Now every bint who ever got fucked and felt guilt about it will be grassing up the celebrity she threw her knickers at. It's a farce and will completely ruin my potential future sex life if i get famous. It's like one other guy said - back in the 70's they weren't asking for people's birth certificates...
If you do get "Famous" then just remember it does not give you the right to shag 12 year old kids.

I also never knew that becoming Famous gave you the right to sleep with kids even back in the 70's :wink:

[e8_pqck]

If you do get "Famous" then just remember it does not give you the right to shag 12 year old kids.

I also never knew that becoming Famous gave you the right to sleep with kids even back in the 70's :wink:

well i'm not talking kids, but anyone can cry rape these days, any eighteen year old can be throwing themselves at celebs one minute and crying to the sun the next day once she feels bad about it. I'd be very wary if I was a celeb that's for sure.

[Brettles1986]

Everyone is getting trialed by association atm

[Yates]

all these Jimmy ones are ones that he never fixed it for. like has been said most are slags that threw themselves at them. I can believe one of two stayed quiet. not hundreds!

[blackie_2k5]

tbh

back in the day..from what ive gathered from lots of older i ppl i used to drink with etc

there was no real laws...and anything went, so i doesnt surprise me all this stuff went on

let face it..if you got bummed by someone famous when you were little..you honestly think youd go shouting about it? knowing the money and fame they had to sue you

only have to look at old films and tv programmes (especially police/forces related ones) from around that time to see that things werent done right

[WheresMeNuts]

tbh

back in the day..from what ive gathered from lots of older i ppl i used to drink with etc

there was no real laws...and anything went, so i doesnt surprise me all this stuff went on

let face it..if you got bummed by someone famous when you were little..you honestly think youd go shouting about it? knowing the money and fame they had to sue you

only have to look at old films and tv programmes (especially police/forces related ones) from around that time to see that things werent done rightHitting a woman or being racist or even drink driving in those days was more acceptable,but having sex with a child was always wrong & 100% illegal.
Pedo's will try & convince you otherwise.

[m4tt274]

Hitting a woman or being racist or even drink driving in those days was more acceptable,but having sex with a child was always wrong & 100% illegal

+1 to that.
Though, i don't think its right to plaster about an 'allegation' in the manner they do. They aren't so public about the apology when the person is innocent.
(im on my phone so will await correction upon discovery he's been convicted etc)

[blackie_2k5]

Hitting a woman or being racist or even drink driving in those days was more acceptable,but having sex with a child was always wrong & 100% illegal.
Pedo's will try & convince you otherwise.

from what ive been told in the past youd be surprised what went on behind closed doors back in the day

and it was no secret to most...just seems to all be coming to the surface as of late

so it should..why should ppl get away with it

[Mr_X]

"Two women have made allegations in respect of Jim that date back approximately 25 years. The complainants were then in their 20s.

Not quite a jimmy

[Aly]

I'm getting sick of this now, I feel sorry for the families who's relatives were genuinely abused but it seems like there's far too many dishonest people there who are trying to 'cash in' on the whole situation.

[MrHouston]

Media doesn't help by not explaining why these celebs are being questioned. Jim Davidson for example had some handy pandy with 2 girls in their 20's when he was younger. But the media make it sound like he is another peado...

Again, never believe everything in the papers...

[e8_pqck]

Hitting a woman or being racist or even drink driving in those days was more acceptable,but having sex with a child was always wrong & 100% illegal.
Pedo's will try & convince you otherwise.

You put up a thread about Jim Davidson, then harp on about paedohilia and shagging 12 year olds?

Lets look at the story:

A 53-year-old man was also arrested in Hampshire and subsequently bailed.

In a statement, Mr Davidson's solicitor, Henri Brandman, said two women have made allegations dating back approximately 25 years.

"The complainants were then in their mid-20s. Jim vigorously denies the allegations.


Absoloutly nothing to do with kids - how about you keep your own thread on topic. and not make wild insuations or completely unrelated claims. I believe someone got prosecuted from twitter doing that.

From what i can see, Jim was what 28yo and these women were in there mid 20's. Think how your life is at that age only for it to resurface 25 years later.. I'd bet this is cash motivated.

[Saxoladlesta]

The way I look at it if the "celebrities" don't take out an injunction on papers about reporting it then they have nothing to hide. Two have managed to get an injunction out to stop their names being released to the public via the papers etc.

No ones been charged yet just arrested.

[WheresMeNuts]

You put up a thread about Jim Davidson, then harp on about paedohilia and shagging 12 year olds?

Lets look at the story:

A 53-year-old man was also arrested in Hampshire and subsequently bailed.

In a statement, Mr Davidson's solicitor, Henri Brandman, said two women have made allegations dating back approximately 25 years.

"The complainants were then in their mid-20s. Jim vigorously denies the allegations.


Absoloutly nothing to do with kids - how about you keep your own thread on topic. and not make wild insuations or completely unrelated claims. I believe someone got prosecuted from twitter doing that.

From what i can see, Jim was what 28yo and these women were in there mid 20's. Think how your life is at that age only for it to resurface 25 years later.. I'd bet this is cash motivated.When I posted it stated that Jim Davidson has been arrested by Scotland Yard’s Jimmy Savile Squad over sexual abuse from 2 woman who came forward about the assault when they were in their 20's over 25 years ago.
So looks like SKY News worded it wrong & I just posted the thread on what I heard on the News as we all do.
Yes I do agree if the woman had been around 20 then that's a different story & looks like the media are just misleading everyone to make the "Breaking news" bigger than it actually is.

[hellonpluto]

was he potting the tight brown or the easy pink?

[Manu]

Now every bint who ever got fucked and felt guilt about it will be grassing up the celebrity she threw her knickers at. It's a farce and will completely ruin my potential future sex life if i get famous.

You mean, you plan on spending quality time with corpses down at the morgue?

[e8_pqck]

You mean, you plan on spending quality time with corpses down at the morgue?

that's the crappest word ambiguation i've ever heard, though well done for trying... hur hur hur. :wall: