View Full Version : Shell V-Power Nitro+
Cam
19th April 2013, 05:54
Just checked my email and saw this!
http://i1134.photobucket.com/albums/m620/Cameron_Harman/27DCBE99-4532-4505-BF83-CF13561A20E1-2151-0000030DE8EDA76C.jpg
Random i only filled up 2 days ago! Didnt see nothing about it.
V-Power is already 146.9, this stuff is going to be 170.9 :homme:
Copied from Shells website
After months of extensive testing, we have created a performance fuel to help your car achieve its performance potential. Developed with Scuderia Ferrari, this new formulation is designed to instantly get to work in your engine on deposits which can reduce performance. We have also increased the friction modifier content by 25%*. The friction modifier is designed to reduce friction in critical engine areas, helping to deliver more power to the wheels. Put simply, this is Ferrari's choice for improved performance.
Shell V-Power Nitro+ Unleaded Benefits
Protecting Cylinder Walls – Our Friction Modification Technology is designed to instantly reduce friction between the piston assembly and cylinder wall by coating them with a protective film.
Cleaner Intake Valves and Fuel Injectors – Designed to prevent and clean up deposits that can affect performance. Shell V-Power Nitro+ contains special additives to help stop performance-robbing deposits from building up around the intake valves and fuel injectors.
In comparison to our previous Shell V-Power Unleaded, we have rebalanced the formulation to contain 25% more Friction Modification Technology (FMT). This technology has been tested with Ferrari as part of our long standing technical partnership, and is designed to instantly reduce friction in critical engine areas and thereby help the engine to deliver more power to the wheels.
L888
19th April 2013, 06:00
Sounds awesome! Probably not worth it in my VTR though :p And £1.70!?
Cam
19th April 2013, 06:02
I was joking about the £1.70 :homme:
Sure it wont be cheap though
jasonmayall
19th April 2013, 06:06
Petrol in its own right is a great cleaner though?
Yates
19th April 2013, 06:19
Il keep my eyes open I notice massive difference using v power or momentum 99
chazdear14
19th April 2013, 06:28
I drive a Corsa VXR and using Tesco's momentum 99 i too notice a massive difference, so depending on the price could give this a try.
L888
19th April 2013, 06:45
I was joking about the £1.70 :homme:
Sure it wont be cheap though
Ah.. it's too early for me :bored:
dontpannic
19th April 2013, 06:50
If your car isn't mapped for it, you'll see no difference whatsoever with using higher RON fuels. Fact.
Get your car remapped to work with 97/99RON fuel and you'll see a difference in using it.
I'm currently using regular V-Power in my ST - it's not mapped for it, there's no performance increase and the MPG increase isn't worth the extra cash, I only fill it with V-Power because I'm a chav and the Milltek decat sounds better on overrun :P
12u55
19th April 2013, 07:44
I wander if it'll be as good as that stuff you can get near the Ring. (octane wise)
Nitro, does that mean my car will have NOS?
:P
Alex-W
19th April 2013, 07:51
If your car isn't mapped for it, you'll see no difference whatsoever with using higher RON fuels. Fact.
Get your car remapped to work with 97/99RON fuel and you'll see a difference in using it.
I'm currently using regular V-Power in my ST - it's not mapped for it, there's no performance increase and the MPG increase isn't worth the extra cash, I only fill it with V-Power because I'm a chav and the Milltek decat sounds better on overrun :P
Not really a fact....
My standard MK5 Ibiza Cupra suffered from engine pinking/piston slap using regular 97RON.
Boosted higher performance cars should use higher octane for a faster burn.
m4tt274
19th April 2013, 07:56
3plug ecus can tell the difference, not sure the effect though.
Gandi699
19th April 2013, 07:58
I go on what Renault recommend, or "recommand".
Says 98 so I put vpower or tescos 99 in, i'm sure the pros and cons of this stuff will be all over the internet when it comes out
L33h
19th April 2013, 08:22
I might put some in the bike and see if its any good. Doubt it tho
Manu
19th April 2013, 08:24
What a load of bollocks. Instead of working with mafiararri they'd better focus with the governement on additives reducing 25% of wallet friction.
Yates
19th April 2013, 08:38
If your car isn't mapped for it, you'll see no difference whatsoever with using higher RON fuels. Fact.
Get your car remapped to work with 97/99RON fuel and you'll see a difference in using it.
I'm currently using regular V-Power in my ST - it's not mapped for it, there's no performance increase and the MPG increase isn't worth the extra cash, I only fill it with V-Power because I'm a chav and the Milltek decat sounds better on overrun :P
again not really a fact. I notice a massive difference in my car with it. What st is it?
Yates
19th April 2013, 08:43
Actually just seen its a fiesta lol, it makes a difference to performance cars. Not under powered cars.
12u55
19th April 2013, 08:47
Out of super unleaded stuff, I get much better MPG, on normal 95 stuff I get between 40-50mpg
97+stuff I get a good 50 more miles out of a full tank.
Mochachino
19th April 2013, 08:51
I might give this stuff a go if I see it about. Ive never used the normal fuel only ever VPower with it being an import!
again not really a fact. I notice a massive difference in my car with it. What st is it?
Not even down to noticing, its a fact that the ECUs even in a mk2 saxo is capable of adjusting for the higher ron fuel!
Yates
19th April 2013, 08:55
Danny try momentum 99 from Tesco, noticed a big difference.
He drives a st fiesta, a mk2 vts is a better car
Mochachino
19th April 2013, 08:57
Danny try momentum 99 from Tesco, noticed a big difference.
He drives a st fiesta, a mk2 vts is a better car
Il give it a go, I went for a drive once to try and find some when I had the integra but couldnt even find a tesco that had it! Had a look on their site and the nearest one is miles away in an area I never go to. Il give it a ago though!
Do BP still do that really high ron fuel? That was at like 16 garages nationwide irc.
lol I agree a mk2 VTS is better than the heavy, boat, lazy Fiesta ST :p
Yates
19th April 2013, 08:59
Not sure I've used there ultimate before, didn't notice much. I got caught out when my shell garage was closed and had to put Ron 95 in, from that I went to momentum 99 and the difference was massive.
Anderz
19th April 2013, 10:31
I saw this the other day but il stick to v power it's dear enough, only use cos my cars mapped for the higher stuff, although I seem to get more miles from v power than I do from the tesco stuff unless that's just me?! :homme:
Gandi699
19th April 2013, 10:33
I get that too, its not a massive difference but the tesco 99 compared to vpower gives marginally less mpg and thats keeping roughly the same driving style each day to work etc
Manu
19th April 2013, 10:39
I get slightly more mileage on Vpower but the price difference is 10p, just not worth it.
wadoryu
19th April 2013, 10:46
It's supposed to be the same price as vpower :y:
devilsadvocate
19th April 2013, 11:44
Used to put Vpower in the Clio but don't bother with the BMW.
Jazz
19th April 2013, 11:51
Only use v-power in my M3, mainly to collect points. Might give this new one a go but only if the price is similar, already getting raped for fuel costs.
L33h
19th April 2013, 11:54
I dont think a higher octane petrol would do anything to a saxo lol. Unless it was silly bhp
Tommo87
19th April 2013, 12:02
http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=gQghB4asSnI
Fuels tested.
Prickle
19th April 2013, 12:08
He drives a st fiesta, a mk2 vts is a better car
Pmsl... :P
Sure V-power is 1.66. I picked it up by mistake in Total petrol station few weeks ago and nearly shat (worn text on fuel pump). then picked up the standard fuel.
If anything it will be more then V-power imo. I'd like to run a 1 full tank with it but i cba to pay it.
Gandi699
19th April 2013, 12:14
Pmsl... :P
Sure V-power is 1.66. I picked it up by mistake in Total petrol station few weeks ago and nearly shat (worn text on fuel pump). then picked up the standard fuel.
If anything it will be more then V-power imo. I'd like to run a 1 full tank with it but i cba to pay it.
You picked up Vpower in a Total petrol station? Thats good going :drink:
Prickle
19th April 2013, 12:16
Haaaaa. I did say worn text so assumed with it being expensive it was vpower.. twas 1.66 either way.
I dont go to Total often, only if Asda is shut.
Gandi699
19th April 2013, 12:24
All the total garages by me have been bought by Shell, not complaining one bit at that mind as I had to travel out of my way to get it beforehand.
Saxo generally gets the cheapest 95 going though
Yates
19th April 2013, 14:25
One shell garage in darlo, no Tesco. Sucks
Jamie
19th April 2013, 14:28
I get better fuel consumption from V power and notice a decent difference in performance, I only ever use V power unless I can't fill up @ shell.
On my ST I had it RR'd @ 280.3 on Tescos fuel and the next RR @ same place on V power just later in the year got a smidge under 300. I'm not saying I gained 20 bhp from V power maybe my engine just opened up more but it certainly makes a difference. I don't have the graphs for both readings to post up unfortunately.
welshpug
19th April 2013, 14:32
Its just a re-branding and a slightly different recipe, nothing that much different.
Yates
19th April 2013, 14:33
I will have soon Jamie, well when I get round to it
Prickle
19th April 2013, 14:34
Seen this on my newsfeed.
£30 Nitro gets you;
https://fbcdn-sphotos-d-a.akamaihd.net/hphotos-ak-ash3/21112_10152719492655405_100211165_n.jpg
Jamie
19th April 2013, 14:55
I will have soon Jamie, well when I get round to it
Cool bro look forward to seeing your findings :)
I literally have always believed in the higher octane fuels being better for performance on performance cars. I do believe on eco cars ect because of the way they're set up they won't really benefit from it performance wise but will keep the block cleaner.
Gandi699
19th April 2013, 15:15
the thing is though it all depends on what people class as "performance", even though I use the 97/99 ron I bet it actually does fuck all in the car i have
Tommo87
19th April 2013, 15:25
You never know we may get this up north on the next few years.
Jungle
19th April 2013, 16:18
It is just the new name for a slightly new mix of V-Power, not some kind of super fuel like everyone makes out, still 99 RON. It is not a case of trying it compared to V-Power, anyone who runs V-Power will now have to run V-Power nitro + as it is just the new name for it, just a rebranding by Shell.
As for people saying tesco 99 is better, one thing to consider is V-Power is a true 99 RON, tesco 99 is 97 with additives to boost the RON, V-Power is the better fuel IMO.
I highly doubt anyone see's any real difference on a normal saxo/106 though, mine is mapped to V-Power so we can run more timing, but I wouldn't bother on a standard item.
jones91
19th April 2013, 16:21
http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=gQghB4asSnI
Fuels tested.
Them fuel prices in the vid!!.......makes you cry when you look at what you pay now
RobVT
19th April 2013, 16:27
my ibiza has an adaptive ecu and runs both, runs alot better on 99 though.
dontpannic
19th April 2013, 17:00
Yada yada, slow ST... Snore snore heard it all before, not really interested. Bought it for the overall driving feel, looks and reliability, not the speed. Not that it's a slouch, it was never marketed as a hot hatch so why people compare them to a Saxo VTS or Corsa VXR is beyond me. Why my owning an ST means I can't have knowledge of 'performance' fuels surpasses me...
It is a fact that cars run on 97RON fuel which haven't been specifically mapped for it (I.e. majority of normal dailies, yes, including the VTS...) or manufacturers specifications show that you should run on 97+ RON. Yes, the ECU's can adjust to it (using the knock sensor), but it gives no performance boost (not noticeable). Cars sold in Europe are optimised for 95 RON or thereabouts. This is the most widespread unleaded fuel and means you can safely fill up anywhere and the car will run.
Fifth Gear tested it, there have been many many more independent tests by reputable motoring bodies which have all shown the same thing. Any BHP changes are marginal, and Vpower comes out on top, BUT, the results of the tests show that the MPG and performance increases are not worth the 7-10p per litre difference in the price.
By the way - the VTS is a 'faster' car - not a 'better' car, by any means. I can lower the ST without fear of the trailing arms going and needing either a replacement axel or the car to be scrapped!! (I should know, I own both, and I won't be using the Sax as a daily!)
Harv
19th April 2013, 17:11
It actually works out cheaper for me to buy Tesco momentum 99 to other 95 RON fuels. My Civic averages better MPG and definitely feels more responsive when filled with 99 RON. At the moment I'm running a cold air map on my Kpro which is mapped in America, I think their equivalent of 95 is 99 over here.
dontpannic
19th April 2013, 17:15
You're a perfect example - your civic is mapped for it.
Yates
19th April 2013, 17:19
Yeah people use a shit car for a daily...
you said it makes no difference on your car, well like you said yeah it doesn't on small cars. You based your first fact on how you get on in the festa, hence why im laughing at you. Now I went to get my car serviced, decided on a power run shit thing was needed a remap, but fuel I had was 95 Ron, on way there the shell garage was closed and I needed fuel, he's mapped it and said that it has 95 in, without me saying, says il get over 400 or round with v power, so we will see difference. See if it backs up what you say that it makes no real difference.
Yates
19th April 2013, 17:21
Mines not mapped on it and it makes a difference
dontpannic
19th April 2013, 17:26
Rolling road printout / mpg figures?
Placebo effects do apply to fuel too.
dontpannic
19th April 2013, 17:29
Yeah people use a shit car for a daily...
Who said what was a shit car?
you said it makes no difference on your car, well like you said yeah it doesn't on small cars. You based your first fact on how you get on in the festa, hence why im laughing at you. Now I went to get my car serviced, decided on a power run shit thing was needed a remap, but fuel I had was 95 Ron, on way there the shell garage was closed and I needed fuel, he's mapped it and said that it has 95 in, without me saying, says il get over 400 or round with v power, so we will see difference. See if it backs up what you say that it makes no real difference.
If you're expecting 400bhp from a car it will probably make a slight difference as its not a daily runaround motor (like the Vts).
If you're getting it mapped, then you're just doing exactly what I said about performance fuels...
Not sure I get where you're coming from, apart from being a bit of a dick about people's choice of car.
Yates
19th April 2013, 17:36
You said you wouldn't use a sax as a daily. Everyone uses a shitter as a daily if they have two cars.
My point is, same spec you get better results from v power. My car hasn't changed at all other tha fuel so we will see.
You came and said makes no difference fact, then say it makes minimal, so changed already.
Only said your cars shit
dontpannic
19th April 2013, 17:54
Let me clarify. Although you may see one or two HP difference, it'll make no difference in everyday driving.
How's that? Is that clear enough for you?
Obviously if you're running near 400bhp then it's not a run of the mill motor so will probably benefit a bit more, but I don't know what you drive so I can't tell you.
Re: Sax as daily - I'm using the Saxo as a track car - it was a cheap motor which I can rag around while I still have the Fiesta as my daily (full interior, comfortable, bigger etc).
At the end of the day we all have opinions about other cars but you're a bit of a penis to come out and say my cars shit, when you only disagree with my point of view on a type of fucking petrol. That's a bit lame, dude. I've not once criticised any other car.
0rang3peel
19th April 2013, 18:16
I put v power in my 1.8d speed mobile the other day, I think it increased the bhp from 16 to around 18.
all the other pumps were closed so I had to lol.
Yates
19th April 2013, 18:37
It does make a difference. Like said il have car mapped to it soon, and see if there is, tuner says should get 20bhp more purely by changing fuel. That's a good difference in anyones eyes.
you drive a fiesta, it is shit, if I drove one id say its shit too. because it is.
Look at your first post, going on saying its a fact U see no change, then go on about how your st it makes no difference. But then say later on it will.
dontpannic
19th April 2013, 18:42
Can't believe anyone can be so fucking ignorant. Nice one.
Tommo87
19th April 2013, 18:43
V-power was 98RON the new V-power Nitro+ is 99RON.
Manu
19th April 2013, 18:44
in other news, the fuel sales are at their lowest since fuck knows when. And the barrel price has dropped to $90.
MJ05LLY
19th April 2013, 18:57
Ive just filled up with some of this.
Has it made a difference. Couldn't tell on drive home. Doubt ill see much difference. Was £1.40 I believe so cheaper than I expected. Woman in garage said old V Power was 98 ron, but am sure it was 99.
Off on a blast to Nottingham now, so I can find out if my car thinks any difference of this new juice.
0rang3peel
19th April 2013, 19:05
Can't believe anyone can be so fucking ignorant. Nice one.
he's right though, it is shit LOL
I'm jeremy wade and today I've laid the bait for the river monster dontpannic
Yates
19th April 2013, 19:05
Can't believe anyone can be so fucking ignorant. Nice one.
100% i notice a difference when having 95 then going to 99, tuner who does my car said there is a big difference, my cars not mapped to 99/v power, not all cars as you have said, but you have said for a fact that if your cars not mapped to it, you will have no difference, but its not a fact and you are wrong, you are so fucking ignorant to that.
dontpannic
19th April 2013, 19:11
Whatever. You should have seen the video posted up there, seen the independent tests, etc. Believe what you want to believe.
No need to start calling my car shit though - so immature.
Yates
19th April 2013, 19:30
fiesta STs are shit, nothing immature about that, im not saying just yours is shit, the whole range of them are, like said id i owned one i wouldnt shout about it.
I notice that when you started talking bout it you refer to it as an ST, hoping people think you have a focus ;)
dontpannic
19th April 2013, 20:15
Not even going to rise to it. It's a fucking car. True it's a bit underpowered but its the only downside. Build quality is great, totally reliable, nippy, and looks good. That's all that matters.
Just because its not as fast as its competitors doesn't make it shit.
Oh - pro tip - I call it an ST because its an ST. No other reason.
Though I bet the Focus ST is shit too because the Megane is quicker, eh?
dontpannic
19th April 2013, 20:17
It's worth noting I haven't driven my MK2 VTS on the road yet (lack of MOT), and I'm sure it's probably quicker than the Fiesta - that's why I'm using it as the track car ;)
Prickle
19th April 2013, 20:23
Though I bet the Focus ST is shit too because the Megane is quicker, eh?
Oh thats it now. You will set Jamie off :homme:
dontpannic
19th April 2013, 20:24
Rofl! Probably shouldn't have said that hehe.
I guess we'll agree to disagree eh?
MJ05LLY
19th April 2013, 20:34
Well this new stuff pops and bangs like the old stuff.
My 40 mile test has concluded that my car still like to drink it just as much.
My car is mapped to 97 Ron petrol but I can def tell when I have 95 stuff in. Feels really weird and sluggish. So much so that I try my best to avoid it. I normally run on Esso's stuff as its closest but from time to time Shell gets used. If Tesco was closer I would happily try that too.
Yates
19th April 2013, 22:04
Nah I like the focus st.
You cant tell when you have 95 in U liar. Fact.
fiestas don't look good!
dontpannic
19th April 2013, 22:22
fiestas don't look good!
Subjective.
You missed an all important part of that sentence - "in my opinion".
VTR-Chris
19th April 2013, 22:22
my focus is mapped for super so i always run it on that, cant say i notice a dif as its what ive always put in anyway
i do get more pops and bangs with 95 though, on the odd occasion it does get filled with it
Anderz
21st April 2013, 22:04
Just filled up with this new vpower nitro + paid £1.43 :n:
Viper
21st April 2013, 23:00
It is pretty common knowledge that the Fiesta ST is shit.
Bordtea
22nd April 2013, 00:56
Might try this in the bike, not worth it on the VTR though
dontpannic
22nd April 2013, 05:50
It is pretty common knowledge that the Fiesta ST is shit.
Boring.
Viper
22nd April 2013, 06:59
Boring.
Yeah they really are boring.
Gandi699
22nd April 2013, 07:54
Seems this is just a rebranding as I filled up last night with it, standard Vpower is not available
Jungle
22nd April 2013, 08:13
SOrry to barge in on this lover's tiff but Yates wtf are you going on about, of course you will get more BHP from mapping your car to a higher RON fuel, but on a standard every day saxo you will not see any noticeable difference, if you do it is placebo.
And to whoever said V Power was 98, you are wrong, was already 99.
Viper
22nd April 2013, 08:33
SOrry to barge in on this lover's tiff but Yates wtf are you going on about, of course you will get more BHP from mapping your car to a higher RON fuel
Try reading again.
100% i notice a difference when having 95 then going to 99... my cars not mapped to 99/v power
Jungle
22nd April 2013, 09:14
Try reading again.
Well TBH I got a little confused trying to decipher his posts, to me he seemed to be saying his car has been mapped on 95, the tuner has then said bring it back with V-Power in and we can get another 20 horses out of it, which makes sense, but doesn't help his argument of seeing a difference without mapping it.
It does make a difference. Like said il have car mapped to it soon, and see if there is, tuner says should get 20bhp more purely by changing fuel. That's a good difference in anyones eyes.
you drive a fiesta, it is shit, if I drove one id say its shit too. because it is.
Look at your first post, going on saying its a fact U see no change, then go on about how your st it makes no difference. But then say later on it will.
Like i said before the reason you make more BHP on higher RON fuel is that you can put more timing in before detonation starts to happen, more timing generally equals more power, unless you are running an ECU that can do that itself and a highly tuned motor you won't see the differences without a map.
Tommo87
22nd April 2013, 10:00
SOrry to barge in on this lover's tiff but Yates wtf are you going on about, of course you will get more BHP from mapping your car to a higher RON fuel, but on a standard every day saxo you will not see any noticeable difference, if you do it is placebo.
And to whoever said V Power was 98, you are wrong, was already 99.
Please let shell know this as they seem to think their v-power was 98 and all their literature states v-power as 98RON.
Jungle
22nd April 2013, 11:33
Please let shell know this as they seem to think their v-power was 98 and all their literature states v-power as 98RON.
Please provide some evidence to back up your fact? Last I knew V-Power was 99RON in the UK, Optimax was 98 but that was back in the day when we still had dinosaurs and stuff...
devilsadvocate
22nd April 2013, 11:55
Pulled upto a pump yesterday in the BMW and stuck £30 of the diesel stuff in at £1.49p a litre......50 miles later and my MPG was the same as it normally is and there are no other differences I can see.
wadoryu
22nd April 2013, 13:29
The difference will be minimal. But over a period of time opcould do the world of good. I always chuck the finest in as it barely costs anymore.
jpsaxo
22nd April 2013, 13:39
On a performance engine you will notice a decent difference, on any normal engine you might as well not bother.
On my daily drive I put in 95, on my Saxo I will never use anything apart from vpower/nitro plus.
Also I must say - anyone that can afford a car with a high performance engine can afford a few extra pence per litre
Yates
22nd April 2013, 15:54
Jungle come to Darlington. Il take U out, il even let u drive, once with 95 and one with 99 just to prove my point it makes a massive difference in my car.
Yates
22nd April 2013, 15:56
Jungle why have U called everyone wrong who said it was 98 Ron saying its 99, then U said its 98 Ron. Have I missed something?
W343NNA
22nd April 2013, 18:29
Tried this stuff last night, w reg furio 1.4, 106 s1 rallye inlet MK2 vtr injectors FPR 421 mani and supersprint,
After say 5 mins, You can deffinantly tell the differnce Huge pick up in acceleration and exhaust tone end of the day its still just a 1.4, But it felt quicker than usual no placebo,
Viper
22nd April 2013, 19:01
Jungle come to Darlington. Il take U out, il even let u drive, once with 95 and one with 99 just to prove my point it makes a massive difference in my car.
It doesn't really matter what fuel you use, you just throw it out of the back in flames anyway.
Jungle
22nd April 2013, 19:12
Jungle come to Darlington. Il take U out, il even let u drive, once with 95 and one with 99 just to prove my point it makes a massive difference in my car.
What car what mods and what ECU?
Jungle why have U called everyone wrong who said it was 98 Ron saying its 99, then U said its 98 Ron. Have I missed something?
It was a typo, I have corrected it.
Yates
22nd April 2013, 19:48
Evo, 380bhp and standard ecu.
wadoryu
22nd April 2013, 21:11
Picked up the instore leaflet earlier, it says it is a 99ron
dontpannic
22nd April 2013, 21:21
Evo, 380bhp and standard ecu.
Well no wonder you can tell the difference. I'm sure the Evo is a car from the factory that is recommended to be run on high octane fuels which is why you notice it's slower when using 95...!
Why are you running a 380bhp Evp on 95RON anyway?
12u55
22nd April 2013, 21:28
Cos it's about 13p cheaper?
dontpannic
22nd April 2013, 21:29
Really? Quibbling over 13p a litre when running a 380bhp Evo?
dan1788
22nd April 2013, 21:40
Saw this in my local shell the other day, was only like 4-5 pence a litre more. Worth it when your filling up not even a pound or more per fill up, might as well why not?
wadoryu
22nd April 2013, 21:41
13p a liter? Da fuck v never seen it more than 8p
Viper
22nd April 2013, 21:43
Why are you running a 380bhp Evp on 95RON anyway?
Do people actually bother to read threads these days?
Now I went to get my car serviced, decided on a power run shit thing was needed a remap, but fuel I had was 95 Ron, on way there the shell garage was closed and I needed fuel
I'm surprised you did it actually. I would have just rung up and said I couldn't go. Fuck putting 95 in the S15!
Mochachino
22nd April 2013, 22:05
Think some people might be getting their octane and RON figures mixed up?
Yates
22nd April 2013, 22:15
Well no wonder you can tell the difference. I'm sure the Evo is a car from the factory that is recommended to be run on high octane fuels which is why you notice it's slower when using 95...!
Why are you running a 380bhp Evp on 95RON anyway?
Read thread mate, Tom I was on way to mappers, and as said I wasn't supposed to be getting mapping done, only had a tenner of stuff in. Either run out of fuel on a1 or put in 95. Easy choice.
Only time I've ever put it in, and sods law ended up getting it mapped as previous map as that bad.
Really? Quibbling over 13p a litre when running a 380bhp Evo?
Who said that?! I've never complained about petrol prices lol, who buys an evo to complain about petrol prices?! its like someone calling a fiesta a performance Car, just doesn't happen!
Viper
22nd April 2013, 22:20
Oh aye, I forgot how shit the original map was! That flat spot was fun.
I think dontpanic was saying that comment to the tool who suggested you put 95 in because it's cheaper than Vpower.
Yates
22nd April 2013, 22:23
gettin map tweeked for v power nxt time I have a good run at home, just waiting to hear back from the guy
dontpannic
23rd April 2013, 06:54
I think dontpanic was saying that comment to the tool who suggested you put 95 in because it's cheaper than Vpower.
Absolutely.
Didn't see the post where you said about going to the tuners and the shell was shut, apologies.
wadoryu
23rd April 2013, 07:17
Think some people might be getting their octane and RON figures mixed up?
Who? Because my A-level chemistry says the ResearchOctaneNumber is for short the octane number.
Jungle
23rd April 2013, 07:53
Evo, 380bhp and standard ecu.
Well fuck a duck no wonder you can tell the difference, I said in a standard saxo you can't tell the difference, Evo's are built to run on 97+ so obviously will run shit on 95, glad we cleared that up
Gandi699
23rd April 2013, 07:58
Tried this stuff last night, w reg furio 1.4, 106 s1 rallye inlet MK2 vtr injectors FPR 421 mani and supersprint,
After say 5 mins, You can deffinantly tell the differnce Huge pick up in acceleration and exhaust tone end of the day its still just a 1.4, But it felt quicker than usual no placebo,
Total placebo effect
Manu
23rd April 2013, 08:04
Tried this stuff last night, w reg furio 1.4, 106 s1 rallye inlet MK2 vtr injectors FPR 421 mani and supersprint,
After say 5 mins, You can deffinantly tell the differnce Huge pick up in acceleration and exhaust tone end of the day its still just a 1.4, But it felt quicker than usual no placebo,
http://www.lowbird.com/data/images/2011/06/orly-owl-plane.jpg
RustySkull
23rd April 2013, 09:09
Hmm, might try this in the RS, I don't care what people say, it 100% runs better on 99% and 97%... It idles much better and doesn't lag as much on full throttle.
Yates
23rd April 2013, 09:43
Well fuck a duck no wonder you can tell the difference, I said in a standard saxo you can't tell the difference, Evo's are built to run on 97+ so obviously will run shit on 95, glad we cleared that up
I never said in a saxo you could. Just said I could tell. Doesn't run shit on 95 either
Jungle
23rd April 2013, 13:57
I never said in a saxo you could. Just said I could tell. Doesn't run shit on 95 either
Ok run shit is the wrong wording, Evo ecu's have a knock sensor though and pull timing out when knock is detected, which is what happens when you run them on 95, hence why you see a drop in power. Although it doesn't really matter now, I mis-read your posts thought you were saying it makes a difference on all cars, my bad.
Dany4494
23rd April 2013, 16:07
Just put it in my 1.1 and on the way home from work smoked a vts and a scooby.
Prickle
23rd April 2013, 16:09
http://www.lowbird.com/data/images/2011/06/orly-owl-plane.jpg
:zainy:
Yates
23rd April 2013, 17:44
Just put it in my 1.1 and on the way home from work smoked a vts and a scooby.
your attempt at humour has failed
L33h
23rd April 2013, 18:05
put this in the bike the other day. cant say it made a noticeable difference tbh
Dany4494
23rd April 2013, 18:34
your attempt at humour has failed
Its not a joke.
Jazz
23rd April 2013, 18:41
I've just been running some crappy 95 in the Beamer as the last place I had to stop at had nothing else, just put half a tank of this new Nitro plus pricey stuff so I'll see what I think.
Yates
23rd April 2013, 19:37
Im on the edge of my seat, waiting for this review Jazz!
Jazz
23rd April 2013, 21:59
Im on the edge of my seat, waiting for this review Jazz!
Full review with pics coming to a forum near you.
Noesph
12th May 2013, 15:10
My car seems to pop on the overrun with nitro+ (completely standard car with cat) although it sounds quite cool, but I'm not sure if its good for the car.
Pops with a cat :homme: that wont last long
Mochachino
12th May 2013, 16:22
Turns out ive been filling up the car with this stuff for a few weeks now, didnt notice any difference and its the only option at my petrol station replacing the VPower. Its the same price too, wouldnt be surprised if its just some marketing and rebrand.
saxowebby
12th May 2013, 16:42
put it in my car and it fucked it up big style. I don't recommend it for use in diesels :)
Mochachino
12th May 2013, 16:44
put it in my car and it fucked it up big style. I don't recommend it for use in diesels :)
What happened,why did it fuck it up?
Noesph
12th May 2013, 17:23
Because its petrol......
anyway, that was kind of my worry, its fucking up the cat.
Mochachino
12th May 2013, 17:26
Because its petrol......
anyway, that was kind of my worry, its fucking up the cat.
Its Deisel aswell, just like how Vpower is petrol and deisel..
Davyy
12th May 2013, 17:35
Its Deisel aswell, just like how Vpower is petrol and deisel..
So.. If you were to accidentally put petrol into a diesel, would it be better to be v-power?
Mochachino
12th May 2013, 17:38
So.. If you were to accidentally put petrol into a diesel, would it be better to be v-power?
lol you know what I mean.
Vpower Petrol
Vpower Diesel
Nitro+ Petrol
Nitro+ Diesel
SnakeVTR
12th May 2013, 18:15
V-power nitro gives you an extra 40bhp at the flywheel iirc hur hur
Mochachino
12th May 2013, 18:16
V-power nitro gives you an extra 40bhp at the flywheel iirc hur hur
I thought it gave you an extra flywheel
I thought it gave you an extra flywheel
Didnt know wheels can fly?
Mochachino
12th May 2013, 18:42
Didnt know wheels can fly?
Depends whichway the wheel spins when you pour petrol on it, clockwise or anti clockwise.
SnakeVTR
12th May 2013, 18:52
Depends whichway the wheel spins when you pour petrol on it, clockwise or anti clockwise.
This is true, but doesnt work with 95ron....must be V-power Nitro :y:
adamm
13th May 2013, 08:14
Turns out ive been filling up the car with this stuff for a few weeks now, didnt notice any difference and its the only option at my petrol station replacing the VPower. Its the same price too, wouldnt be surprised if its just some marketing and rebrand.
It is iirc.
stupotvtr
13th May 2013, 21:00
Never noticed a difference from 95 to vpower. Weirdly though in the last few weeks I've noticed 95 tesco stuff doesn't make my exhaust pop and bang as much as shell 95 so I'm guessing shell stuff is better quality.
Plus sounds cooler :)
vBulletin® v3.8.2, Copyright ©2000-2025, Jelsoft Enterprises Ltd.