Saxperience - Citroen Saxo Forum - Making my saxo 1.1 faster.

Page 10 of 10

Show 40 post(s) from this thread on one page

Saxperience - Citroen Saxo Forum (http://www.saxperience.com/forum/index.php)

- Saxo Engine/Performance (http://www.saxperience.com/forum/forumdisplay.php?f=12)

- - Making my saxo 1.1 faster. (http://www.saxperience.com/forum/showthread.php?t=174089)

eddietse91

5th May 2010 07:58

Quote:

Originally Posted by db_sax (Post 4358422)

cut a hole in the metal on the floor under the throttle pedal then you can push it further.

haha yeah and a big spoiler like the gold 1.1 from old woking road

rowly747

2nd December 2010 20:09

Quote:

Originally Posted by c20xejay (Post 4318128)

has anyone ever cammed a 1.1 i have it got 100bhp

What cams were they and did you need remap after etc?

Mikol

2nd December 2010 20:14

Quote:

Originally Posted by rowly747 (Post 4915689)

What cams were they and did you need remap after etc?

Zombie thread revival.

(Also, I think he was taking the piss)

RustySkull

2nd December 2010 20:23

My 1.1 does

1st = 35
2nd = 60
3rd = 75
4th = 100
5th = 100+ (I don't wana go over 100 = Instant Ban if caught)

Changing gear at about 5,000RPM

I have induction kit, breathing mods, Full Exhaust System (4-1 Piper Manifold, Standard VTR Center Section and a Group N BackBox.)

Neither of my Lamber Sensors are plugged in, I don't think that makes a difference but I found it made it run richer due to the ECU being like Ehh? I'll just keep throwing fuel in then lol. Which made it accelerate much quicker :)

MK2 1.1, 65,097Miles.

Mikol

2nd December 2010 21:19

Quote:

Originally Posted by Bikekid450 (Post 4915718)

I don't think that makes a difference but I found it made it run richer due to the ECU being like Ehh? I'll just keep throwing fuel in then lol. Which made it accelerate much quicker :)

This bit makes no sense at all.

Random amounts of more fuel does not equal more performance, only more fuel wasted and falling out your exhaust.

Your car will not accelerating quicker by starving the ECU of the sensors it needs.

RustySkull

2nd December 2010 21:22

Quote:

Originally Posted by Mikol (Post 4915866)

Very true, it's worse than a Tank for Fuel lol Hence why I don't drive it now lol :fcuk:

Sophia_Bush

2nd December 2010 21:29

my 1.1 hits the limiter in 5th without trying all I've done is it fit an induction kit

Kai	3rd December 2010 09:57

Well my 1.1 5 door mpi did at least 97.3 mph but that wasn't redlining, AND i've got a speed ticket from an undercover to prove it :(

otta	4th December 2010 11:33

Quote:

Originally Posted by kai (Post 4916605)

and i've got a speed ticket from an undercover to prove it :(

haha bastards!!

Mikol

4th December 2010 12:25

Quote:

Originally Posted by Sophia_Bush (Post 4915890)

my 1.1 hits the limiter in 5th without trying all I've done is it fit an induction kit

LOL, Gav you don't count :P

Kai	4th December 2010 13:50

Quote:

Originally Posted by otta (Post 4919131)

haha bastards!!

Not really, was a generally nice chap :) Hold no grudges, has stopped me driving like a dick tbh. Don't get me wrong we all speed from time to time, and while it was on the motorway it was still rash!

Dane1

6th December 2010 01:55

my saxo tends to get to about 102 then starts to shake!!
the manual says it can get to 101 so its about right so theres no way it can get to 113 or what ever people are saying here. unless they have been doing some serious modifiying

Dane1

6th December 2010 01:57

You can put a induction kit in it
& exhaust & what ever

Theres still no getting away that it is a 1.1 unless you get a VTR engine and stick it in there. that would be good

chinkostu

6th December 2010 07:33

Quote:

Originally Posted by Kai (Post 4919412)

had some copper pull me for doing a ton. gave me a right rollocking, said if he catches me again its section 59 time and everything else

haven't really sped since!

All times are GMT. The time now is 10:44.

Page 10 of 10

Show 40 post(s) from this thread on one page