Your on a saxo forum :omg:

i know, and i also drive a saxo :omg:

If i had £3k for a new car, i certainly wouldn't be looking at an MG ZR.

thats always good to know :)

you certainly arnt clued up about cars...

please shh.

its great to know, that some people actually have a tad bit of fucking sense when it comes to buying a car.

id rather give 3k to a fucking crack whore, then buy an MG ZR!

do you tuck your tracksuit bottoms into your socks?

you say the accord typeR is rather old looking.

better up your budget if you want something newer...

Mg Zr?

they look awesome !
or maybe an alteza... they look pretty spanky spanky!

:homme:

what is so bad about a mg zr then?

and no i dont even own a pair of track suit bottoms.

I don't mind them personally, although i couldnt see myself owning one.

4doors can GTF anyway. 2 doors or walk. lol

quick, new looking, low miles, 4 doors - all for £3k. the OP is deluded.

edit:

http://pistonheads.com/sales/3139375.htm

http://pistonheads.com/sales/2992827.htm (nasty colour, but you get the idea) - these can be had for around 3k

whats soo good about them?
slow, ugly, expensive, unreliable, common, waste of space . . .

seats feel like shit
interior is so dull and annoying, aswell as looking and feeling super cheap
it lacks, the ability to put a smile on someones face.
gear changes are horrid!
nothing about them is smooth, fluid, soft, ... anyhting you look for in a car.

even the sound of closing the door, sounds cheap and tacky.

MG ZR is a car that can be had for around £1k.

Thats why i wouldn't be looking at them if i had £3k to spend.

as much as id hate to say it, but you could get a nice bimmer for that kind of money.

and you'd be silly not too.

Early E46's look wank, but if you can get past that, you have a whole host of decent motors to chose from.

http://pistonheads.com/sales/3115526.htm

http://pistonheads.com/sales/2905613.htm

http://pistonheads.com/sales/3140563.htm

http://pistonheads.com/sales/3004406.htm

E39:

http://pistonheads.com/sales/3040714.htm

http://pistonheads.com/sales/3138444.htm

http://pistonheads.com/sales/3135057.htm

bearing in mind were on a saxo forum, the 105 is roughly on par with a vtr, and the 120 is roughly on par with the vts.

there roughly the same price as the saxos.

there no more unreliable than a saxo infact there more reliable if there looked after.

there a much more solid car than a saxo

far better built than a saxo

engines are better than the french engines (aslong as uprated head gasket is fitted)

much more fun to drive than a saxo as you can actualy go round corners without wondering if your guna full off the road.

so they are better than a saxo in general.

Either your saxos an absolute shitter, or you can't drive.

Have you even driven any of the cars you have mentioned?

An MG ZR will out handle a saxo?

mug . . .

EDIT: Ashley beat me too it. This kids deluded.