Saxperience - Citroen Saxo Forum - That must be an animal.

Saxperience - Citroen Saxo Forum (http://www.saxperience.com/forum/index.php)

- General Chat... (http://www.saxperience.com/forum/forumdisplay.php?f=11)

- - That must be an animal. (http://www.saxperience.com/forum/showthread.php?t=465229)

Quote:

Originally Posted by JIMNYDAVE (Post 6467872)

For you sad fucks who Probly don't have a car just chill on hear I've built a saxo turbo for a lad on here josh Jones which was then bought by Carl griffis also on here which made 190 bhp my twin engine saxo is alot quicker and also twice the tourqe!!!. So before you paper pushers sat behind ur desk or working in McDonald's want to slap my car off just think " could you build a twin engine car" no you couldn't your ebay bargain freaks that still drive a saxo at 28 I've got a 20k audi as my daily I did this to see if I Could doit and obviously I have feel free to bring ur lumpy cammed up 130 bhp claiming it's 170 down to telford and I'll show you what 280 bhp is actually like and mine don't stall at Evry junction. And for the utter belling who asked why it wasn't listed in cars if you can actually read you will see it says listed by ebay app and any retard knows you can't list cars on the app. Thanks for the actual decent comments and to those who got nothing better to do go buy a ripped gearnob!!!

Highly intelligent but can't spell probably,by the sounds of it my 90bhp saxo automatic could leave you at the lights,which is saying something as a mobility scooter beat it the other day.:homme:

my daily drive is a multi million pound ship

i win

Quote:

Originally Posted by Yates (Post 6467915)

my daily drive is a multi million pound ship

i win

Proper battleships.:y:

You don't "drive" a ship!

I call bullshit!

Quote:

Originally Posted by MuZiZZle (Post 6467930)

You don't "drive" a ship!

I call bullshit!

just cos it has worse gpm than you get

Wow. What have I just read?!

Probably put the very few (veerryyy few) people who might have had the slightest bit of interest, off.

Congratulations on your audi by the way. It seems you've taken a big step up to dieseltown.

I would say at least 50% of the users on this site no longer drive Saxos, instead there are some very, very nice motors owned by the user's on here. Your twenty thousand pound audi is just a drop in the ocean.

It's like me saying 'y0, my German whip was 22k new!' ... It was, but it's a fucking golf bluemotion... nothing to shout about.

Pipe down homie.

Does it do 60 knots in 2nd?

Quote:

Originally Posted by Yates (Post 6467932)

just cos it has worse gpm than you get

Harsh but true!

Quote:

Originally Posted by MuZiZZle (Post 6467930)

You don't "drive" a ship!

I call bullshit!

You drive a boat ... close enough.

Apparently muz this saxo is quicker 0-60 and 0-100 than our cars. Which as said, is interesting, given that the eBay advert basically said "forget about changing gears. Ever".

fucking hilarious coming in saying i drive a 20k audi as my daily thinking hes baller LOL, laughed so hard i broke a rib.

dude 20k for an audi a4 b8 you got ripped off one here for £2 http://www.ebay.co.uk/itm/2008-AUDI-...item27e763d10a ........
or has yours got a twin engine?

Quote:

Originally Posted by JIMNYDAVE (Post 6467872)

"could you build a twin engine car".. The question you need to ask yourself is why the fuck does anybody want a twin engined saxo over the alternatives? For the amount of fabricating that has gone into it you could have built a mid engined rwd turbo Saxo.. You have no decent way of controlling the power bias with your twin engined setup and it has 2 fkin gearboxes!? Twice as much servicing, double the parts + labour and for what exactly? A car that will kill you if you get rear ended on the motorway that is no more than 260bhp AT BEST and more than likely heavier than the standard car. Oh yeah, "feel free to bring ur lumpy cammed up 130 bhp" if a cammed tu5j4 only gives 130bhp how have you got 280 with 2 standard engines?

Quote:

Originally Posted by Ross (Post 6467963)

Apparently muz this saxo is quicker 0-60 and 0-100 than our cars. Which as said, is interesting, given that the eBay advert basically said "forget about changing gears. Ever".

If it wouldn't cripple me financially I'd go and destroy it with the BM, whilst towing my VTS

In all honesty, I imagine my 106 could likely lick it by the sounds of it, either from a dig purely because by the sounds of it getting gears is hard, and more likely on a track, because I really can't see the combination of not getting gears, and having the weight of another engine / 283mm rear brakes helping it get around well.

That said of course, I'm not cammed up at 130bhp claiming to have 170bhp, so that might swing the balance against me.

Although I can speak english, so I imagine I'd be able to converse with track officials and actually get on the track faster.

Quote:

Originally Posted by MuZiZZle (Post 6467987)

If it wouldn't cripple me financially I'd go and destroy it with the BM, whilst towing my VTS

Genuinely lolled - same here.

Like so?

https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=ESxrTt7X8RU

Basically that

But the merc is more faster than the M5 according to top gear.

I just can't see a twin engines Saxo you can't change gear in being very quick at all.

On paper yes but in reality probably not

Quote:

Originally Posted by MuZiZZle (Post 6468024)

I can't even see it on paper tbf.

lol, reminds me of the barryboys archives. Barry comes in and insults everyone because his death trap is more awesomer than your top of the range german barge. Point in case being, oh you could not possibly build one like that.

My sides.

"This is for the. Car infusiast it's not a daily driver it's purely for racing."

Wish i was an infusiast, as i'm not, i guess i can't have it.

seat choice seems odd seeing as its a 'race car'