View Single Post
Old 18th August 2010, 02:37   #40
Barry123
Saxperience Hardcore!
Track / Motorsport PrepContent ContributorCentral South Region MemberNorth East Region MemberYorkshire Region Member
 
Barry123's Avatar
 
Join Date: Oct 2005
Location: Aycliffe
Posts: 32,205
Car(s): Saxo VTS
iTrader Score: 7 (100%)
Barry123 is absolutely fabulous!Barry123 is absolutely fabulous!Barry123 is absolutely fabulous!Barry123 is absolutely fabulous!Barry123 is absolutely fabulous!Barry123 is absolutely fabulous!Barry123 is absolutely fabulous!Barry123 is absolutely fabulous!Barry123 is absolutely fabulous!Barry123 is absolutely fabulous!Barry123 is absolutely fabulous!
Default

Quote:
Originally Posted by ryanmt View Post
cheers man I'll have a read of it now

Quote:
Originally Posted by axsaxoman View Post
you can get gains but not by using std ecu +narrow band --you are stuck with the preset lambda values .
std ecu runs WOT too rich to be honest -
it is quite normal for customers to remark on the better economy after having fitted t/bodies --when cruising back home --thats because we have better control of fuelling than the std ecu .
you can run 16-1 or 17-1 on LIGHT cruise ,but NOX levels rise --thats why 14.7 is lambda 1 and what std cars are set to--for emission regs
Thanks again John, really appreciate your thoughts. So you're saying even with the standard FPR and ECU that the AFR is still too rich at WOT? blimey.

Yeah I forgot about the rising NOx for leaner conditions! There's a graph somewhere showing the variation of HC's, COx, NOx with AFR which is interesting. Ta!
Barry123 is offline   Reply With Quote