You just don't listen my 'friend'. I suspect the only reason is because you don't like to think of yourself been ripped off over the years.
You can not say who drives the car more than the 'main' driver, and it would be virtually impossible for a 3rd party to gather evidence of such. (A recorded admission or CCTV over a period of months maybe).
You are not quoting Law, which you couldn't because it doesn't exist, on the legal definition of a 'main driver' and even if it said 'used the car more than a named driver - in hours and minutes' ; once again: This. Could. (Almost) Never. Be. Proven.
Therefore we must agree on what you say - "It's perfectly legal to be a named driver and drive the car."
That is - the bottom line.
Last edited by outrage_uk; 6th December 2010 at 01:11.
|