View Single Post
Old 9th February 2012, 13:45   #211
blackie_2k5
Saxperience Hardcore!
Track / Motorsport PrepNorth East Region Member
 
blackie_2k5's Avatar
 
Join Date: Oct 2008
Location: Birtley
Posts: 22,253
Car(s): VTR Turbo, 106 xsi track slag, Transit recovery, B
iTrader Score: 25 (100%)
blackie_2k5 is on a distinguished road
Default

Quote:
Originally Posted by axsaxoman View Post
fitting a thicker h/gasket or decomp late is never the real solution as ideally you want as thin a gasket as possible to give better heat transfer from head to block ,thats why the jp4 has deeper combustion chambers and a thinner h/gasket --cos citroen were aware of the h/gaskets blowing on the original tj4 engine ,they first changed to an MLS gasket ,but when they did a redesign they still used MLS but made it thinner , better heat transfer
check out all modern design engine they all use very thin gaskets
you say use double gaskets rather then decomp..

but talk about heat transfer being poor through thicker head gaskets?, so why not use a thin mls and aluminium decomp..which will work as an extension to the combustions chambers to get your desired CR...and should transfer heat alot better then 2 large head gaskets

i understand your saying dont use that route to begin with... pistons ideally yes are then best route, but not everyone can/wants to budget for that

can you elaborate on this, as by your own logic your contradicting your own posts?
__________________
Quote:
Originally Posted by Stissy View Post
EDIT: i give up on you.
Quote:
Originally Posted by Giraffe View Post
FUCK YES. I won on the internet.

Last edited by blackie_2k5; 9th February 2012 at 13:51.
blackie_2k5 is offline   Reply With Quote
The Following User Says Thank You to blackie_2k5 For This Useful Post: