Osama Bin Laden.. - Page 6 - Saxperience

djmartin · 2nd May 2011, 18:58

tbh if he is real I think my dad hit the nail on the head.

they say he was burried at sea my dads worked over in such countries and its tradition to burry at sea.

secondly........My dads theory is this...they captured him put him in a helicopter confirmed they had him and the goverment just said ''kill him'' bang bang two shots to the head open the side door on the chopper and push him out over the ocean...that tbh sounds more like it to me! they just making it sound less grusome & cold blooded on the news.

Rogue_Shadow · 2nd May 2011, 19:13

They thought they had killed Saddam Hussain at least 3 times untill they finally got him. He had loads of expendable body doubles. Saddam was a small fish, do you really think Bin Ladden with larger resources couldn't do something similar?
And Burried at Sea with next to no photo's of the body.
Sorry but I don't believe it one bit, regardless with Col Gadafi's son killed in the same weekend ... Things are going to get heated very quickly on two separate fronts.
The US may of stomped a figurehead , but the thing with extremists is they hardly rely on leadership in the first place. The London bombings were carried out by a splinter Cell of a Larger Fraction.

Ryyy · 2nd May 2011, 20:09

It's Al-Qaeda everyone needs to worry about, not the taliban..the tally are localised farmers with guns and even they are dying out, they are usually restricted to Afghanistan and Pakistan with followers floating around.

Al-Qaeda are a worldwide problem, the yanks have had it.

Ryyy · 2nd May 2011, 20:16

Plus Pakistan's intelligence agency are as corrupt as anyone/anything.

Then again so is the US Government.

He won't be dead, look at 9/11, all the media coverage, the ' hoo-hah ' about who did it etc, but it was an inside op as everyone with 2 brain cells will know.

Heliosphan · 2nd May 2011, 20:19

Quote:

Originally Posted by mechsman

Add to the Pentagon issue that:
1. There were no strike marks from wings, tail fin, and the 6 TONNES of engine under each wing.

2. No scorch marks from the mass amount of av gas that would have gone up on impact.

3. The smell of cordite that multiple people who WOULD know reported.

4. The fact that whatever hit the pentagon went through 25 FEET of some the most reinforced concrete walls in buildings today and that is not possible for a commercial air liner. (They're built mostly of aluminium and fibreglass)

5. Parts of the engines built from titanium could not have melted in the fire because of all the materials present even the av gas doesn't burn hot enough to vaporise it.

6. The still standing cable drum that should have been wiped out by the plane on the incoming trajectory

7. The lack of evidence from cctv footage (existing footage does NOT show a plane, it shows something akin to a cruise missle fire trail)

8. The jet engine "wheel" that they "found" at the site was categorically NOT an APU wheel as they claimed and it was not big enough to be from the main engines.

etc etc

The overall picture does not add up, waaaaaaaaaay waaaaaaaaaaaaaay too many inconsistancies

Oh dear. I knew it was only a matter of time before someone posted up this kind of nonsense.

Your first point made me laugh actually. What the hell do you want? A Wylie Coyote style hole in the wall in the shape of a plane? Lol.

There are whole websites dedicated to debunking this kind of crap with scientific reasoning and simple logic. However, in true conspiracy theorist style you pin your hat on half-baked theories and spout off as if they're stone wall facts. Christ, i found the answer to your first two points in about 30 seconds flat. I'm guessing most of the other points are also straw men so i won't waste my time.

You're entitled to your opinion of course, i just don't buy it.

jonathon5 · 2nd May 2011, 20:52

What's going on ?

Has some one discovered the secret to the 11 hervs & spices ?

Or is so meglomaniac terrorist dead ?

For real

Furio-Gazza · 2nd May 2011, 20:57

http://www.facebook.com/?ref=home#!/...72135939508742

haha

saxo-parts · 2nd May 2011, 20:59

its all bullshit, he's alive and well and running a Spar shop near you

Graeme^p · 2nd May 2011, 21:09

Why does everyone think they will target the UK? Yes we are allies with the US of A but they are the ones that have killed him, I think they will retaliate with something big in the US of A this year

Jam3s · 2nd May 2011, 21:18

Yehh, I wanna thank the guy who assassinated his ass.

devilsadvocate · 2nd May 2011, 21:28

Quote:

Originally Posted by mandyslover70

its all bullshit, he's alive and well and running a Spar shop near you

Had to chuckle at this

CEdwards · 2nd May 2011, 21:38

Oh Hi Bin Laden..

http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=ahpzz...&feature=feedu

Bound · 2nd May 2011, 22:17

Quote:

Originally Posted by mechsman

Add to the Pentagon issue that:
1. There were no strike marks from wings, tail fin, and the 6 TONNES of engine under each wing.

2. No scorch marks from the mass amount of av gas that would have gone up on impact.

3. The smell of cordite that multiple people who WOULD know reported.

4. The fact that whatever hit the pentagon went through 25 FEET of some the most reinforced concrete walls in buildings today and that is not possible for a commercial air liner. (They're built mostly of aluminium and fibreglass)

5. Parts of the engines built from titanium could not have melted in the fire because of all the materials present even the av gas doesn't burn hot enough to vaporise it.

6. The still standing cable drum that should have been wiped out by the plane on the incoming trajectory

7. The lack of evidence from cctv footage (existing footage does NOT show a plane, it shows something akin to a cruise missle fire trail)

8. The jet engine "wheel" that they "found" at the site was categorically NOT an APU wheel as they claimed and it was not big enough to be from the main engines.

etc etc

The overall picture does not add up, waaaaaaaaaay waaaaaaaaaaaaaay too many inconsistancies.

I've looked at a whole load of stuff on the twin towers and there's a lot of stuff that doesn't add up their as well.

Dream world chap unfortunately, sorry to break it to you.

saxo_vtr_53 · 2nd May 2011, 22:20

its about time

he is the don of hide and seek though, 10 years un-found lol

Kyza · 2nd May 2011, 22:22

Has newtz been in this thread yet?

If not

inb4newtzandhistheorys

MartinDines · 2nd May 2011, 22:38

I believe it.

Thought the burial was abit odd at first, but after reading up on it - it was definitely the right thing for the US to do. Especially at sea.

Moke · 2nd May 2011, 22:45

I'm already fed up of Bin Laden jokes. LOL JK, bring on the Talibanter!

Hatcha · 2nd May 2011, 22:55

Quote:

Originally Posted by Rogue_Shadow

They thought they had killed Saddam Hussain at least 3 times untill they finally got him. He had loads of expendable body doubles. Saddam was a small fish, do you really think Bin Ladden with larger resources couldn't do something similar?
And Burried at Sea with next to no photo's of the body.
Sorry but I don't believe it one bit, regardless with Col Gadafi's son killed in the same weekend ... Things are going to get heated very quickly on two separate fronts.
The US may of stomped a figurehead , but the thing with extremists is they hardly rely on leadership in the first place. The London bombings were carried out by a splinter Cell of a Larger Fraction.

Well said, but Bin Laden's leadership was extremely major compare to other factions, due to nearly all of Al Qaeda's money coming from him.
Only time will tell how strong they are without him i guess..