Gaming, IT, Multimedia & Music Please use this forum to discuss Gaming, IT, Multimedia & Music. |
|
7th June 2008, 21:18
|
#1
|
Established Member
Join Date: Jan 2008
Location: Northampton
Posts: 2,241
Car(s): Citroën Saxo VTR
|
iPod video formatting
Using Videora to convert AVI video files to either MOV, MPEG-4 or H.264.
Wondering, out of them 3 formats - which is the best?
Going with MPEG-4 as it stands.
Using an iPod Touch btw!
Cheers
__________________
- My Progress Thread -
| Citroen Saxo VTR | Lowered 50mm on Apex Sports Suspension Kit | BMC CDA Enclosed Induction Kit | Powerflow Exhaust System | FLI 1000w 12" Sub with Built-in Amp |
|
|
|
7th June 2008, 21:22
|
#2
|
Established Member
Join Date: Jan 2008
Location: Northampton
Posts: 2,241
Car(s): Citroën Saxo VTR
|
Was after a quick answer hence why I posted in General chat, nevermind......................
__________________
- My Progress Thread -
| Citroen Saxo VTR | Lowered 50mm on Apex Sports Suspension Kit | BMC CDA Enclosed Induction Kit | Powerflow Exhaust System | FLI 1000w 12" Sub with Built-in Amp |
|
|
|
7th June 2008, 21:59
|
#3
|
Infrequent Poster
Join Date: Apr 2008
Posts: 181
|
I think mpeg4 is best for putting it onto an ipod/phone etc
__________________
|
|
|
8th June 2008, 00:03
|
#4
|
Established Member
Join Date: Jan 2008
Location: Northampton
Posts: 2,241
Car(s): Citroën Saxo VTR
|
Found this, http://plasticbugs.com/?p=305
Very informative, seems H.264 is the way to go...
__________________
- My Progress Thread -
| Citroen Saxo VTR | Lowered 50mm on Apex Sports Suspension Kit | BMC CDA Enclosed Induction Kit | Powerflow Exhaust System | FLI 1000w 12" Sub with Built-in Amp |
|
|
|
8th June 2008, 00:31
|
#5
|
L-plater
Join Date: May 2008
Posts: 29
|
in my experience, mpeg 4 saves the most space, but lacks in terms of quality
|
|
|
8th June 2008, 10:45
|
#6
|
Established Member
Join Date: Jan 2008
Location: Northampton
Posts: 2,241
Car(s): Citroën Saxo VTR
|
Quote:
Originally Posted by CraN-VTS
in my experience, mpeg 4 saves the most space, but lacks in terms of quality
|
Quote from that site:
Quote:
Which video format is better for iPod video?
That’s a tough question. H.264 is arguably better because it offers high quality and a much smaller file size when compared to MPEG-4. However, both formats look quite good when you encode your video at the higher supported video settings. One thing that most people will agree on is that H.264 video takes longer to encode than standard MPEG-4. This means that converting a two hour movie to iPod video can take considerably longer using the H.264 codec (especially with QuickTime Pro’s pokey Export: Movie to iPod video option). Still, I prefer the H.264 codec in most instances.
|
I'll probably just try both and see
Cheers lads!
__________________
- My Progress Thread -
| Citroen Saxo VTR | Lowered 50mm on Apex Sports Suspension Kit | BMC CDA Enclosed Induction Kit | Powerflow Exhaust System | FLI 1000w 12" Sub with Built-in Amp |
|
|
|
8th June 2008, 11:07
|
#7
|
Saxperience Forum Bum
Join Date: Mar 2007
Location: Leicesterrr!
Posts: 2,523
|
mp4.
good space, quite good quality.
|
|
|
Posting Rules
|
You may not post new threads
You may not post replies
You may not post attachments
You may not edit your posts
HTML code is Off
|
|
|
All times are GMT. The time now is 19:08.
|