General Chat... This forum is for general chit-chat, banter, exchange of information, etc. Pretty much everything goes... within reason! |
|
|
12th October 2012, 12:08
|
#1
|
Saxperience Forum Bum
Join Date: Oct 2009
Location: Nottingham
Posts: 3,954
Car(s): Stage 1 Mitsubishi Evo 6
|
Controlled Demolition of tower seven (9/11)
|
|
|
12th October 2012, 12:26
|
#2
|
Regular Poster
Join Date: Jul 2012
Location: Dundee
Posts: 488
Car(s): Looking for 16v furio.
|
Of course it was controlled, what building do you know that just falls down?
|
|
|
12th October 2012, 12:27
|
#3
|
Saxperience Post Whore
Join Date: Jul 2011
Location: Newcastle upon Tyne
Posts: 7,779
Car(s): Phase 2 VTS , E61 M5
|
Quote:
Originally Posted by DUFC
Of course it was controlled, what building do you know that just falls down?
|
the other two?
__________________
Turtle neck, with another on deck, 'case I spill something on it, like some light beer, check!
|
|
|
12th October 2012, 12:30
|
#4
|
Established Member
Join Date: Sep 2008
Location: Sheffield
Posts: 1,206
Car(s): 106 Rallye Turbo
|
Tupac did it
__________________
SHEFFCRUISE < The biggest modified car club in sheffield
|
|
|
12th October 2012, 12:35
|
#5
|
Saxperience Hardcore!
Join Date: Oct 2008
Location: Birtley
Posts: 22,253
Car(s): VTR Turbo, 106 xsi track slag, Transit recovery, B
|
Quote:
Originally Posted by Jungle
Tupac did it
|
Ali g's dog?
__________________
Quote:
Originally Posted by Stissy
EDIT: i give up on you.
|
Quote:
Originally Posted by Giraffe
FUCK YES. I won on the internet.
|
|
|
|
12th October 2012, 12:43
|
#6
|
Saxperience Forum Bum
Join Date: Oct 2009
Location: Nottingham
Posts: 3,954
Car(s): Stage 1 Mitsubishi Evo 6
|
haha it's an old article... just saw it whilst clearing out my inbox and hoped it may spark some kind of mini thread war....
However definately was controlled for tower 7...
it's the only sky scraper ever to fall from fire alone...
|
|
|
12th October 2012, 12:44
|
#7
|
Established Member
Join Date: Sep 2008
Location: Sheffield
Posts: 1,206
Car(s): 106 Rallye Turbo
|
Quote:
Originally Posted by matt_vtr_15a
haha it's an old article... just saw it whilst clearing out my inbox and hoped it may spark some kind of mini thread war....
However definately was controlled for tower 7...
it's the only sky scraper ever to fall from fire alone...
|
I hope that's not all you have, that is a very weak argument.
__________________
SHEFFCRUISE < The biggest modified car club in sheffield
|
|
|
12th October 2012, 12:46
|
#8
|
Saxperience Post Whore
Join Date: Jan 2010
Location: Stourbridge
Posts: 7,338
Car(s): Nissan 200sx S14a
|
It was da American government I knw it cuz I wotched loose change on YouTube.
|
|
|
12th October 2012, 12:49
|
#9
|
Saxperience Post Whore
Join Date: Aug 2010
Location: Little Mill, South Wales
Posts: 7,547
Car(s): Mondeo ST TDCI
Saxo VTS
|
I'm no conspiracy theorist but if the government had something to do with the original attacks and it was mainly government organisations in tower 7 then they would want to do something to cover their tracks and that seems like the ideal thing to do.
war started
__________________
Quote:
Originally Posted by Giraffe
I'm happy being a north easternly smoggie bender.
|
|
|
|
12th October 2012, 12:57
|
#10
|
Saxperience Post Whore
Join Date: Jan 2010
Location: Stourbridge
Posts: 7,338
Car(s): Nissan 200sx S14a
|
|
|
|
12th October 2012, 13:02
|
#11
|
Saxperience Post Whore
Join Date: Jul 2011
Location: Newcastle upon Tyne
Posts: 7,779
Car(s): Phase 2 VTS , E61 M5
|
so if the 3rd one was a controlled explosion, why were the charges in place?
__________________
Turtle neck, with another on deck, 'case I spill something on it, like some light beer, check!
|
|
|
12th October 2012, 13:03
|
#12
|
Saxperience Forum Bum
Join Date: Oct 2009
Location: Nottingham
Posts: 3,954
Car(s): Stage 1 Mitsubishi Evo 6
|
Quote:
Originally Posted by Jungle
I hope that's not all you have, that is a very weak argument.
|
Not at all...
My mum works for the company that manufactured and supplied the fire protection to the twin towers and even tower 7...
The fire protection was literally obliterated the second the jet smashed into the towers as it was never designed (from a fire perspective) for such a scenario...
Tower 7 though was not hit by anything but debris such as dust, materials from the falling trade centres over 100metres away nothing that would of affected the structural steel or associated fire protection...
it dropped straight to the ground, didn't collapse in any direction but downwards and into it's own footprint...
Why would it do that? I was very suspect about that, I can understand the twin towers falling due to the impact it suffered and explosion from the aircraft, initial damage to the structure and insane temperatures due to the fuel and explosion from the aircraft..
Flying debris that hit tower 7 would cause cosmetic damage to a building it wouldn't reduce the structural performance of a building to that degree...
The skyscraper would more than likely be burned down with the structural frame of the building being exposed and still standing if anything...
The temperatures of the fire would of been nothing like that of the twin towers....
Last edited by matt_vtr_15a; 12th October 2012 at 13:05.
|
|
|
12th October 2012, 13:07
|
#13
|
Saxperience Post Whore
Join Date: Mar 2009
Location: Isle of Man
Posts: 9,844
Car(s): 92 Eunos
|
Quote:
Originally Posted by MuZiZZle
so if the 3rd one was a controlled explosion, why were the charges in place?
|
BECAUSE ThE GOVERNMENT DID IT ALL!
|
|
|
12th October 2012, 13:11
|
#14
|
Saxperience Forum Bum
Join Date: Oct 2009
Location: Nottingham
Posts: 3,954
Car(s): Stage 1 Mitsubishi Evo 6
|
Quote:
Originally Posted by Jay_
BECAUSE ThE GOVERNMENT DID IT ALL!
|
not even any white text..
SERIOUS
|
|
|
12th October 2012, 13:12
|
#15
|
Established Member
Join Date: Mar 2009
Location: derby
Posts: 1,276
Car(s): Black 03 vtr, Yamaha R1 @185 bhp
|
Quote:
Originally Posted by Brettles1986
I'm no conspiracy theorist but if the government had something to do with the original attacks and it was mainly government organisations in tower 7 then they would want to do something to cover their tracks and that seems like the ideal thing to do.
war started
|
That theory is just retarded! Why would the government want to claim so many innocent lives? It was a terrorist attack plotted by al-Qeada not a government terrorist attack
i bit
|
|
|
12th October 2012, 13:12
|
#16
|
Saxperience Post Whore
Join Date: Jan 2010
Location: Stourbridge
Posts: 7,338
Car(s): Nissan 200sx S14a
|
Personally I hate these conspiracies and most of you know I do my best to disprove them.
But I must admit I can't accept the official story for WTC7. Everything else I can give a reasonable explanation for. But not WTC7. Looking forward to seeing the results.
|
|
|
12th October 2012, 13:12
|
#17
|
Saxperience Post Whore
Join Date: May 2006
Location: Kent
Posts: 8,205
Car(s): :(s)rac
|
Can't remember where I saw it, but the debris caused more than 'cosmetic' damage.
I believe it might have actually been the report in that link.
|
|
|
12th October 2012, 13:14
|
#18
|
Saxperience Post Whore
Join Date: Mar 2009
Location: Isle of Man
Posts: 9,844
Car(s): 92 Eunos
|
Quote:
Originally Posted by matt_vtr_15a
not even any white text..
SERIOUS
|
I was hoping that people didn't need white text tbh!
|
|
|
12th October 2012, 13:15
|
#19
|
Saxperience Post Whore
Join Date: Jul 2011
Location: Newcastle upon Tyne
Posts: 7,779
Car(s): Phase 2 VTS , E61 M5
|
I get that a plane could blast all of the fire protection off the steel, and aviation fuel fire could weaken it, hence the twin towers falling
but the other tower must have had something naughty in it if it was a controlled explosion, for that kind of timeframe, and that much media on the ground, my money would be on the building being pre rigged?
__________________
Turtle neck, with another on deck, 'case I spill something on it, like some light beer, check!
|
|
|
12th October 2012, 13:18
|
#20
|
Established Member
Join Date: Mar 2009
Location: derby
Posts: 1,276
Car(s): Black 03 vtr, Yamaha R1 @185 bhp
|
Quote:
Originally Posted by MuZiZZle
I get that a plane could blast all of the fire protection off the steel, and aviation fuel fire could weaken it, hence the twin towers falling
but the other tower must have had something naughty in it if it was a controlled explosion, for that kind of timeframe, and that much media on the ground, my money would be on the building being pre rigged?
|
Why would they pre rig it if they had no idea that there was going to be a terrorist attack on the first two towers? It's not phesable
|
|
|
Posting Rules
|
You may not post new threads
You may not post replies
You may not post attachments
You may not edit your posts
HTML code is Off
|
|
|
All times are GMT. The time now is 10:39.
|