Mobile Devices: Lite Theme Citroën: Citroën Trader | Saxo Trader | C2 Trader Peugeot: Peugeot Trader | 106 Trader Enthusiast: Saxperience


Go Back   Saxperience - Citroen Saxo Forum > Saxperience Community Related > Suggestions / Improvements / Feedback

Suggestions / Improvements / Feedback Tell us your ideas of how we can make Saxperience a better place. Also, if we are doing something right... let us know, so that we can do more of it!

Reply
 
Thread Tools Display Modes
Old 15th May 2009, 15:57   #21
lpoolck
Infrequent Poster
 
Join Date: Jan 2009
Posts: 165
lpoolck is on a distinguished road
Default

Quote:
Originally Posted by Ryan View Post
Its not just 100 posts btw its also a 30 day membership duration.

Most scammers are put off by this.

We removed all viewing rights to the forums for this because there were still some big scams going on.

They wont be changing in the near future thats for sure no matter how many newbies complain.
I think I have come accross wrong, I am not complaining, I am just offering suggestings on how to improve the site, I was mearly giving an observation I had. I am sorry if people have took this the wrong way....this is why I didnt ever post! lol

Quote:
Originally Posted by Ben View Post
I think the rules are good as they are, as said above the 30 day rule stops most scammers as they want a quick sale.
Its a fair point
lpoolck is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 15th May 2009, 16:05   #22
Ryanp
Super Moderator
Track / Motorsport Prep
 
Ryan's Avatar
 
Join Date: Feb 2004
Location: Tonbridge United Kingdom (England)
Posts: 38,236
Car(s): Vtr, 172, throttle bodied track slut
iTrader Score: 11 (100%)
Ryan is absolutely fabulous!Ryan is absolutely fabulous!Ryan is absolutely fabulous!Ryan is absolutely fabulous!Ryan is absolutely fabulous!Ryan is absolutely fabulous!Ryan is absolutely fabulous!Ryan is absolutely fabulous!Ryan is absolutely fabulous!Ryan is absolutely fabulous!Ryan is absolutely fabulous!
Default

Quote:
Originally Posted by lpoolck View Post
I think I have come accross wrong, I am not complaining, I am just offering suggestings on how to improve the site, I was mearly giving an observation I had. I am sorry if people have took this the wrong way....this is why I didnt ever post! lol
We only recently implemented the scheme, because members were being scammed badly.

id say trying to protect the members from this is a good thing, changing it back so they are more open to scams isnt an improvement
__________________
God made beer, women and Throttle bodies
Ryan is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 15th May 2009, 16:59   #23
lpoolck
Infrequent Poster
 
Join Date: Jan 2009
Posts: 165
lpoolck is on a distinguished road
Default

Quote:
Originally Posted by Ryan View Post
We only recently implemented the scheme, because members were being scammed badly.

id say trying to protect the members from this is a good thing, changing it back so they are more open to scams isnt an improvement
ok thank you for acknowldging my suggesting, it its a method thats working and all memebers are happy then keep up the status quo! its a great site, that was my only suggestion!..not critisim! lol
lpoolck is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 15th May 2009, 17:05   #24
Simop
Administrator
Track / Motorsport PrepContent ContributorNorth West Region Member
 
Simo's Avatar
 
Join Date: Dec 2002
Location: Warrington
Posts: 20,551
Blog Entries: 64
Car(s): Blue Saxo VTS Turbo/White Megane F1 R26
iTrader Score: 3 (100%)
Simo is absolutely fabulous!Simo is absolutely fabulous!Simo is absolutely fabulous!Simo is absolutely fabulous!Simo is absolutely fabulous!Simo is absolutely fabulous!Simo is absolutely fabulous!Simo is absolutely fabulous!Simo is absolutely fabulous!Simo is absolutely fabulous!Simo is absolutely fabulous!
Default

Thanks for your suggestion. there have been many threads suggesting similar removal of the restricitions that I put in place.

Unfortuantely however, far too many members failed to protect themselves and stick to good solid trading practices and as a result, they allowed themselves to be conned out of money and/or items.

The no posting restriction was put in place to stop people trying to con members by offering fake or non-existant goods for sale.

The no viewing restriction was put in place to stop members from being conned after posting 'wanted' articles in the wanted forums, which fake 'sellers' responded to via PM to strike up a deal.

Its a shame we've had to put these restrictions in place, but if people can't protect themselves and then consider this the responsibility of Saxperience... which it quite frankly is not... then something had to be done to try to reduce the aftermath of people's own foolishness.

As a result of many scams over a relatively short period, the restrictions were put in place and limits increased from 50 posts upto 100 posts and 30 days registered.

We could debate the scale of your suggested improvement, but that very much depends upon your point of view, as to whether you consider it an improvement, or back-tracking.

Sorry... but thats just the way things are.

Simo
__________________
Infraction Introduction ¦ Removal of rep' system ¦ My 'Storm Trooper' ¦ My Blog! ¦ Follow Saxperience on Twitter

Simo's Turbo Re-build Progress

Quote:
Originally Posted by Graeme
The Focus is ace! Smooth ride and cheap as chips!
Simo is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 15th May 2009, 17:22   #25
lpoolck
Infrequent Poster
 
Join Date: Jan 2009
Posts: 165
lpoolck is on a distinguished road
Default

Quote:
Originally Posted by Simo View Post
Thanks for your suggestion. there have been many threads suggesting similar removal of the restricitions that I put in place.

Unfortuantely however, far too many members failed to protect themselves and stick to good solid trading practices and as a result, they allowed themselves to be conned out of money and/or items.

The no posting restriction was put in place to stop people trying to con members by offering fake or non-existant goods for sale.

The no viewing restriction was put in place to stop members from being conned after posting 'wanted' articles in the wanted forums, which fake 'sellers' responded to via PM to strike up a deal.

Its a shame we've had to put these restrictions in place, but if people can't protect themselves and then consider this the responsibility of Saxperience... which it quite frankly is not... then something had to be done to try to reduce the aftermath of people's own foolishness.

As a result of many scams over a relatively short period, the restrictions were put in place and limits increased from 50 posts upto 100 posts and 30 days registered.

We could debate the scale of your suggested improvement, but that very much depends upon your point of view, as to whether you consider it an improvement, or back-tracking.

Sorry... but thats just the way things are.

Simo
Thank you Simon, its a shame that a minority of idiots spoil the full experience of others. I can completly understand why you do it. Maybe aswell they should be a thread that helps those see the tricks that the con people do, as many of the cons are the same old ones and not many are new.

For example they will send you a cheque...obvious its going to bounce, but request goods ASAP as its a prescent etc. Maybe a thread to share this scams could also be useful.

Thank you for getting back to my suggestion, its much appreciated, and you put across the reasonings as to why you made this ruling up very concise
lpoolck is offline   Reply With Quote
Reply

Bookmarks

Thread Tools
Display Modes

Posting Rules
You may not post new threads
You may not post replies
You may not post attachments
You may not edit your posts

BB code is On
Smilies are On
[IMG] code is On
HTML code is Off

Forum Jump


All times are GMT. The time now is 13:34.