| Saxo In Car Entertainment (ICE) & Security This forum should be used to chat about all things relating to in-car entertainment... |
 |
24th March 2014, 09:54
|
#2
|
|
Administrator
Join Date: Dec 2002
Location: Glasgow United Kingdom (Scotland)
Posts: 26,097
Car(s): Chelski Traktor
|
The JL would be my choice
|
|
|
|
24th March 2014, 12:37
|
#3
|
|
Saxperience Addict
Join Date: Dec 2009
Posts: 11,709
Car(s): A4 SE/A6 Le Mans
|
would vote JL too.
|
|
|
|
|
24th March 2014, 19:44
|
#4
|
|
L-plater
Join Date: Jul 2011
Location: Bude, Cornwall
Posts: 49
Car(s): 00 VTR + Corrado VR6
|
I doubt there will be much difference, the JL looks better though!
|
|
|
|
|
24th March 2014, 20:12
|
#5
|
|
Saxperience Forum Bum
Join Date: Aug 2009
Location: Dorking,Surrey,M25 J9
Posts: 2,616
Car(s): Static -80mm Peugeot 405
|
Through brand choice. JL Audio.
This is funny, but... I have one of their 250/1 amps running 2 x Kicker solo baric L5's @ i think 600wrms each. I dont see the need for a bigger amp, it enough to hurt my ears as it stands, and thats enough.
|
|
|
|
|
26th March 2014, 20:40
|
#6
|
|
Saxperience Addict
Join Date: Jan 2008
Location: west london
Posts: 13,810
|
ok cheers guys
|
|
|
|
|
29th March 2014, 02:21
|
#7
|
|
Saxperience Post Whore
Join Date: Jul 2011
Location: Newcastle upon Tyne
Posts: 7,779
Car(s): Phase 2 VTS , E61 M5
|
JL over RF? whaaaa?
__________________
Turtle neck, with another on deck, 'case I spill something on it, like some light beer, check!
|
|
|
|
|
29th March 2014, 10:59
|
#8
|
|
Saxperience Addict
Join Date: Jan 2008
Location: west london
Posts: 13,810
|
The jl has 200rms and the rf has 150 I think
|
|
|
|
|
30th March 2014, 17:22
|
#9
|
|
Saxperience Forum Bum
Join Date: Aug 2009
Location: Dorking,Surrey,M25 J9
Posts: 2,616
Car(s): Static -80mm Peugeot 405
|
Though i just purchased some rockford components. Epic.
|
|
|
|
|
31st March 2014, 21:39
|
#10
|
|
Saxperience Addict
Join Date: Jan 2008
Location: west london
Posts: 13,810
|
yeah ive always thought Rockford Fosgate are up there with one of the best brands you can get when it come to audio?? but then they are less powerful than the JL.. i dont know 
|
|
|
|
|
31st March 2014, 21:41
|
#11
|
|
Administrator
Join Date: Dec 2002
Location: Glasgow United Kingdom (Scotland)
Posts: 26,097
Car(s): Chelski Traktor
|
No one said the Rockford was bad or poor.
IMO JL edges Rockford.
Power doesnt mean better or worse, look at the loudest.com shite if you want "numbers" that mean nowt.
JL were always known for quality, possibly not the loudest but known for keeping it tight when properly used.
|
|
|
|
|
1st April 2014, 15:35
|
#12
|
|
Established Member
Join Date: Mar 2011
Location: Birmingham
Posts: 2,148
Car(s): Rover BRM, Rover 800 Coupe, Mk6 golf.
|
I've only ever heard glowing reports on the Rockford stuff before - Never ever heard anyone slate them!
I was contemplating getting a set of their components with an amp, but i'm too lazy.
__________________
|
|
|
|
|
12th April 2014, 18:33
|
#13
|
|
Newbie
Join Date: Mar 2014
Location: Portsmouth
Posts: 29
Car(s): Ford Smax tdci , Saxo VtS 03
|
I Always used to run a RF amp with a JL sub
JL subs are extremely good quality and have never disappointed me.
|
|
|
|
Posting Rules
|
You may not post new threads
You may not post replies
You may not post attachments
You may not edit your posts
HTML code is Off
|
|
|
All times are GMT. The time now is 04:58.
|
Whats a better sub out of these?
button at the side of the post.
Linear Mode
