Reputation System & Thread Tagging - Page 8 - Saxperience

saxodan · 7th October 2008, 00:48

Quote:

Originally Posted by db_sax

same as i said and for that reason aswell.

Thats not the point though, they shouldn't have to get used to certain members abuse and bad rep becuase they are new

saxodan · 7th October 2008, 00:49

Quote:

Originally Posted by Jacko

mods do vary...some are cool and let things flow, and then some do think they are god and will try their hardest to get a pat on the head from simo...

and reporting mods to mods aint really my thing...

but i think you should let mods know they need to let the banter be, give them guidelines and make sure they stick to them...

eg. chris, is a decent mod...usually joins in banter and always gives a generall warning before slapping a lock on...

where as ryan, doesnt join in the banter and doesnt warn when threads go of track...he locks the threads with a smug comment...

naaaa mean?

if I could rep you know young man

Jacko · 7th October 2008, 00:50

Quote:

Originally Posted by saxodan

I know what you mean about the mods on power trips, one in particular, not a problem with the rest, never had

I see what you mean about the sense of humour, but I see it as an aquired taste, too many newbies come on here without a clue who people are, how they act etc etc
not everyone comes on here with the same sarcastic, digging and "one up" culture that sax-p seems to have. This is no reason to bad rep them

If you know what I mean

yea..but unless your a complete spaz, you will soon click onto the banter...you can either join in or cry and become a victim...

Japman · 7th October 2008, 00:51

agreed

chris is cool like that dont see him on that often anymore

pred RULES and always gives us a warning-because of this ill tend to get the thread back on topic as he goes about it the right way

mods that just lock and leave smug comments

well theres one word for them

Mochachino · 7th October 2008, 00:52

Quote:

Originally Posted by saxodan

Thats not the point though, they shouldn't have to get used to certain members abuse and bad rep becuase they are new

i dont mean like that mate. I mean for example, when i very first joined saxp, i got neg repped for asking what style driving poeple had if they were economical or a speeding loonatic.

Noobs who get neg repped for that such as talking about racing and driving like prats, will get the forum a bad name, and a bad image for saxo owners.

But if the noobs cant get repped will 500 posts then any thread they do make, they can get wanred by other poeple, so they dont do it again.

I got neg repped a fair bit when i first joined, then tunred it around with helping out making guides etc, with the odd neg rep such as "poeple cant help if theyre spotty" when i made a comment that mcy d's workers are spotty.

i dont know where im going with this, probs dosent even make sense lol, im tired Sorry.

Japman · 7th October 2008, 00:52

Quote:

Originally Posted by Jacko

yea..but unless your a complete spaz, you will soon click onto the banter...you can either join in or cry and become a victim...

im suspect for that

people who cry get penty of shit off everyone

Jacko · 7th October 2008, 00:52

Quote:

Originally Posted by Japman

agreed

chris is cool like that dont see him on that often anymore

pred RULES and always gives us a warning-because of this ill tend to get the thread back on topic as he goes about it the right way

mods that just lock and leave smug comments

well theres one word for them

ginger?

Simo^p · 7th October 2008, 00:53

Quote:

Originally Posted by Jacko

mods do vary...some are cool and let things flow, and then some do think they are god and will try their hardest to get a pat on the head from simo...

and reporting mods to mods aint really my thing...

but i think you should let mods know they need to let the banter be, give them guidelines and make sure they stick to them...

eg. chris, is a decent mod...usually joins in banter and always gives a generall warning before slapping a lock on...

where as ryan, doesnt join in the banter and doesnt warn when threads go of track...he locks the threads with a smug comment...

naaaa mean?

I know what you mean... it was actually Ryan who was recently telling the rest of the mod's to let things slide and go with the flow in gen chat mind!

Maybe I need to have another chat with the mods in general. I think its pretty obvious when something over steps the mark... depends on how many shades of grey people interpret I suppose

djrem · 7th October 2008, 00:53

Quote:

Originally Posted by Japman

mods that just lock and leave smug comments

well theres one word for them

Tupps is a mod now?

Yah for Tupps.

Congratulations.

djrem · 7th October 2008, 00:54

Turn off postcount in the General Chat section imo.

Spam issues solved.

Japman · 7th October 2008, 00:54

if tupps was a mod he would make my rep huge and post count so you fukcers coudnt catch me

go tupps x

Jacko · 7th October 2008, 00:56

Quote:

Originally Posted by Simo

I know what you mean... it was actually Ryan who was recently telling the rest of the mod's to let things slide and go with the flow in gen chat mind!

Maybe I need to have another chat with the mods in general. I think its pretty obvious when something over steps the mark... depends on how many shades of grey people interpret I suppose

thats the thing, i dont know how youd make it clear when exactly a thread needs a mod to take action...but inconsistancy from mods isnt imo good for the forum...

Graeme^p · 7th October 2008, 00:58

Quote:

Originally Posted by Japman

if tupps was a mod he would make my rep huge and post count so you fukcers coudnt catch me

go tupps x

saxp would also become full of spam and out of control

djrem · 7th October 2008, 00:59

Quote:

Originally Posted by Jacko

thats the thing, i dont know how youd make it clear when exactly a thread needs a mod to take action...but inconsistancy from mods isnt imo good for the forum...

Agreed.

Japman · 7th October 2008, 00:59

Quote:

Originally Posted by Jacko

ginger?

c...

you work out the rest

Japman · 7th October 2008, 01:00

Quote:

Originally Posted by Graeme

saxp would also become full of spam and out of control

but it would also become very funny with plenty of humour and laughter

Simo^p · 7th October 2008, 01:01

Quote:

Originally Posted by Jacko

thats the thing, i dont know how youd make it clear when exactly a thread needs a mod to take action...but inconsistancy from mods isnt imo good for the forum...

I agree, but its often not as simple as that. Whilst a group of you may be having a laugh about something, someone else may be complaining about your chit-chat. A mod has to weigh up both sides... and take action. Both sides wont be happy dependant on the mod's decision.

Mochachino · 7th October 2008, 01:03

Quote:

Originally Posted by Jacko

thats the thing, i dont know how youd make it clear when exactly a thread needs a mod to take action...but inconsistancy from mods isnt imo good for the forum...

such as

http://www.saxperience.com/forum/sho...d.php?t=178512

joke thread making poeple laugh, entertaining and got locked

then a user thats getting slated, and goes on for pages n doesnt get locked:http://www.saxperience.com/forum/sho...d.php?t=178512

Japman · 7th October 2008, 01:03

if someone doesnt like the chit chat then they can easily get out of the thread that the chit chat is in

we dont ask them to sit there watching it

they are not tied to any thread

adam19 · 7th October 2008, 01:03

this threads going no where