Mobile Devices: Lite Theme Citroën: Citroën Trader | Saxo Trader | C2 Trader Peugeot: Peugeot Trader | 106 Trader Enthusiast: Saxperience


Go Back   Saxperience - Citroen Saxo Forum > Citroen Saxo Related Forums > Saxo Problems & Queries
Register Member Photo AlbumsBlogs FAQ Calendar Experience

Saxo Problems & Queries If you're having problems with your Saxo and you're after a bit of advice, check this forum out...

Reply
 
Thread Tools Display Modes
Old 29th October 2018, 11:40   #1
dturbo
Infrequent Poster
 
Join Date: Jul 2018
Posts: 163
dturbo is on a distinguished road
Default Axle refurb / lowering question

Hi all,

My VTS has already been lowered, looks about -40mm I would say. I have some play in the arm bearings, so I plan to remove the arms and see how the pins look. If they are decent I will renew the bearings rather than go for a refurb beam.

I have read various guides and they suggest making a sort of jig once the shocks are removed, basically measure the distance between the shock mounting positions then make a jig so that when refitting the arm, you put it in that position then insert the torsion bar, thus preserving the ride height you had.

I just wondered about something. surely in the resting position with the shock removed, the arm is placing some downward load on the torsion bar which will be resisting this (i.e. at the point when you measure the distance between the mounts). If so, then when you refit the torsion bar it will be unloaded - won't this then result in a slightly different ride height to what you had? Or is it insignificant?
dturbo is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 29th October 2018, 14:35   #2
Furioman
Frequent Poster
 
Join Date: Jan 2004
Location: Denny United Kingdom (Scotland)
Posts: 665
Car(s): Ford focus 2.0 Saxo VTS
Furioman is on a distinguished road
Default

yes slightly different but probably not noticeable
__________________
.....
Furioman is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 29th October 2018, 19:38   #3
MartinObviously
Saxperience Forum Bum
Track / Motorsport PrepScotland Region Member
 
MartinObviously's Avatar
 
Join Date: Dec 2012
Location: Perth
Posts: 3,663
Car(s): Peugeot 106 1.1 Turbo Peugeot 106 1.5D Turbo Peuge
MartinObviously is infamous around these parts
Default

Quote:
Originally Posted by dturbo View Post
Hi all,

My VTS has already been lowered, looks about -40mm I would say. I have some play in the arm bearings, so I plan to remove the arms and see how the pins look. If they are decent I will renew the bearings rather than go for a refurb beam.

I have read various guides and they suggest making a sort of jig once the shocks are removed, basically measure the distance between the shock mounting positions then make a jig so that when refitting the arm, you put it in that position then insert the torsion bar, thus preserving the ride height you had.

I just wondered about something. surely in the resting position with the shock removed, the arm is placing some downward load on the torsion bar which will be resisting this (i.e. at the point when you measure the distance between the mounts). If so, then when you refit the torsion bar it will be unloaded - won't this then result in a slightly different ride height to what you had? Or is it insignificant?
That's why you do it properly.

The distance for standard ride height is 305mm between the holes.

it's a ratio of 2.5. so if you want to go 40mm, it's 40/2.5 which is 16mm. you want 289mm between the bolt holes.
__________________
The rain kept a trollin'
MartinObviously is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 29th October 2018, 19:47   #4
dturbo
Infrequent Poster
 
Join Date: Jul 2018
Posts: 163
dturbo is on a distinguished road
Default

Quote:
Originally Posted by MartinObviously View Post
That's why you do it properly.

The distance for standard ride height is 305mm between the holes.

it's a ratio of 2.5. so if you want to go 40mm, it's 40/2.5 which is 16mm. you want 289mm between the bolt holes.
Hi Martin, thanks for the info. That's probably a better way to approach it.

I'm not sure that doing it by precalculated numbers, rather than measure before removing the torsion bar and replicate that measurement before re-fitting it, changes the fact that the resulting drop will be a little bit different though, just that you won't notice the difference as you haven't tried to replicate what you had.

Cheers
Craig
dturbo is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 29th October 2018, 19:53   #5
MartinObviously
Saxperience Forum Bum
Track / Motorsport PrepScotland Region Member
 
MartinObviously's Avatar
 
Join Date: Dec 2012
Location: Perth
Posts: 3,663
Car(s): Peugeot 106 1.1 Turbo Peugeot 106 1.5D Turbo Peuge
MartinObviously is infamous around these parts
Default

Quote:
Originally Posted by dturbo View Post
Hi Martin, thanks for the info. That's probably a better way to approach it.

I'm not sure that doing it by precalculated numbers, rather than measure before removing the torsion bar and replicate that measurement before re-fitting it, changes the fact that the resulting drop will be a little bit different though, just that you won't notice the difference as you haven't tried to replicate what you had.

Cheers
Craig
But you know how low it's going to be by calculations regardless fo what you had before.

To be fair, unless you're using brand new bars it's not really going to matter if you're a few mm out or the weight of the arm
__________________
The rain kept a trollin'
MartinObviously is offline   Reply With Quote
Reply

Bookmarks


Posting Rules
You may not post new threads
You may not post replies
You may not post attachments
You may not edit your posts

BB code is On
Smilies are On
[IMG] code is On
HTML code is Off

Forum Jump


All times are GMT. The time now is 08:41.