View Full Version : yet another 'what 4-2-1 manifold do I get?' thread - help please!
hudson701
14th July 2008, 22:21
OK, I've been reading all the recent threads on 4-2-1 manifolds which has left me confused tbh as they all seem to give conflicting information. From what I gather these are the major producers of 4-2-1 mannis:
Raceland - cheap, with poor build quality. likely to blow a hole/not last very long. However, very popular.
Supersprint - expensive, excellent build quality.
Milltek - not much info.
Janspeed - expensive, sometimes poor build quality/welds. Other than that, not much info.
GMC - haven't found much on this manni.
I have a mk2 vts with a powerflow backbox system - what 4-2-1 manifold should I get? Are Raceland as bad as the majority seem to make out?
Also, to fit the manifold, will i have to remove anything from the existing setup, and will the car pass it's mot? Will I need a new centre section?
Help here, not sure what I need. I'm fairly competent with spanners so will most likely fit it myself.
Cheers TIA
makaveli144
14th July 2008, 22:25
Also, to fit the manifold, will i have to remove anything from the existing setup, and will the car pass it's mot? Will I need a new centre section?
VTS cats are always under the car so will pass mot no problem.
I have a raceland on my VTR and it has being fine, doesnt blow and made the car more raspy and a lot more responsive. In the way of gains they are all very very similar so that shouldnt really affect your decision.
hudson701
14th July 2008, 22:51
VTS cats are always under the car so will pass mot no problem.
I have a raceland on my VTR and it has being fine, doesnt blow and made the car more raspy and a lot more responsive. In the way of gains they are all very very similar so that shouldnt really affect your decision.
So basically its a straight fitment of the 4-2-1 mannifold? no removing any of the undersection, or moving any other bits? Sounds too good to be true...
williamsvts
14th July 2008, 22:53
GMC no questions asked imo.
Matty-VTR
14th July 2008, 23:20
GMC no questions asked imo.
Based on what? More power over the others?
williamsvts
14th July 2008, 23:49
better build quility and better designed imo, just an overall better manifold.
paddy88
14th July 2008, 23:53
what kind of power gains do u expext to get with a manifold? 10 bhp?
paddy88
15th July 2008, 16:13
anyone?
makaveli144
15th July 2008, 16:16
So basically its a straight fitment of the 4-2-1 mannifold? no removing any of the undersection, or moving any other bits? Sounds too good to be true...
Basically yes, not sure but you may have to move the oil filter though.
I think 10bhp optimistic, probably about 7.
hudson701
15th July 2008, 23:05
GMC no questions asked imo.
And where can i get one from?
Echo the question above, is there really much of a performance gain or is it just noise?
makaveli144
15th July 2008, 23:09
hudson you would need to contact GMC, GMC manifold is 4-1 not 421 and it is all explained here http://www.gmcmotorsport.co.uk/index.php?main_page=page&id=30
Furio_Rob
15th July 2008, 23:18
GMC only do 4-1 iirc
i have the same dilema atm
raceland for about £150-200
or supersprint for abour £300
think ill just go with raceland tbh, the difference cant be much and if you have it fitted profesionally should be ok :y:
hudson701
15th July 2008, 23:30
hudson you would need to contact GMC, GMC manifold is 4-1 not 421 and it is all explained here http://www.gmcmotorsport.co.uk/index.php?main_page=page&id=30
Well 4-1's are for high end gains correct? And 4-2-1 are for all through the range gains, perhaps better gains low down. For this reason I think they might be better suited to the vts power delivery.
Yates
15th July 2008, 23:39
4-1 better suited to vts imo
higher up revs for 4-1, vts kicks in higher up the rev range also
suited
i have 4-1 gmc
KamRacing
16th July 2008, 10:09
Well 4-1's are for high end gains correct? And 4-2-1 are for all through the range gains, perhaps better gains low down. For this reason I think they might be better suited to the vts power delivery.
You can't use such a simplified rule.. the raceland gets gains at low revs, medium and top end..
yorkie
16th July 2008, 10:17
i have ashley 4-2-1 mild steel manifold it seems to do the trick
Yates
16th July 2008, 10:56
yorkie you have vtr
leeroybrown
16th July 2008, 11:00
This is how I have always seen it
4-2-1 works good on a VTR
4-1 I still I think is best suited to a VTS
Between me and 2 other mates we have had pretty much had every manifold and all stand by the GMC as being the best.
b0t13
16th July 2008, 15:23
i got the raceland 4-2-1 and im happy with it, good power cheap and quality isnt that bad tbh.
hudson701
16th July 2008, 20:57
mmmm....tempted by a 4-1 now going by what people have said. Is there much of price difference between a 4-1 and a 4-2-1? What about fitment, any issues there?
andy-vtr
17th July 2008, 17:50
get a piper 4 - 1 there spot on ;) both me and my mate have them.
andy-vtr
17th July 2008, 17:52
all in all get what you thinks best, mines cammed and revs well top end with a 4-1 ;)
hudson701
17th July 2008, 19:58
do piper do 4-1's for a mk2 vts?
JamesR
6th August 2008, 14:34
yeah piper do 4-1's for a mk2 vts, u have to giv em a call though.
KamRacing
6th August 2008, 14:43
yeah piper do 4-1's for a mk2 vts, u have to giv em a call though.
we sell most of the manifolds in the list above.
Don't quite agree with the summary in the first post though.
For piper etc
http://www.kamracing.co.uk/citroen-saxo-1/exhaust-20/manifold-38/
Certainly regarding the build quality of the raceland they aren't as easy to fit and the finishing is sometime a little rough but none that we've sold have fallen apart. They come with a guarantee for a few years too.
hudson701
6th August 2008, 22:42
Don't quite agree with the summary in the first post though.
OK, then please correct me. What is your view of the manifolds?
I'm looking for a new manifold to give the best possible 0 - 60/80mph performance, rather than top end gains. Reason being is that in everyday driving you're not going to be doing 100+mph, so modifications which only show a real benefit at these types of higher speeds are wasted IMO (on the road, anyway).
As I said earlier, advice is welcome.
vBulletin® v3.8.2, Copyright ©2000-2025, Jelsoft Enterprises Ltd.