View Full Version : 160-170bhp vtr?
iw_laurence
20th April 2009, 11:15
right im toying with geting more power out of my vtr, i want around 160-170 bhp, what do i need to do to get it up there (except drop the 16v in there)
cheers guys, and dont worry this isnt a dreamer thread so please no stupid comments
dinga
20th April 2009, 11:23
couple a grand for starters !
Jorge-
20th April 2009, 11:24
a turbo
iw_laurence
20th April 2009, 11:28
couple a grand for starters !
thats fine
a turbo
is there no way of achieving it n/a?
VTSTomE
20th April 2009, 11:29
A pretty low spec turbo build would see you there. Then you could save and go crazy!
AlexB
20th April 2009, 11:29
seen a charged one with 141 at wheels so 170ish at fly
bout the best way to go imo
iw_laurence
20th April 2009, 11:30
ive been toying with turbo but my exhaust system wouldnt be suited for it i dont think...
Jorge-
20th April 2009, 11:30
If you can afford a turbo, I am sure you can afford to upgrade the exhaust. You will never achieve that power N/A
A VTS will struggle to see that N/A
Mike_08
20th April 2009, 11:31
change it lol
iw_laurence
20th April 2009, 11:32
seen a charged one with 141 at wheels so 170ish at fly
bout the best way to go imo
whats involved with supercharging it? is headwork nessecery? and does it require special fuelling?
iw_laurence
20th April 2009, 11:33
If you can afford a turbo, I am sure you can afford to upgrade the exhaust. You will never achieve that power N/A
A VTS will struggle to see that N/A
change it lol
its not that i cant afford to change it, its that im happy with the sound and dont think i will be able to replicate that with say a 2.5" system
AlexB
20th April 2009, 11:38
If you can afford a turbo, I am sure you can afford to upgrade the exhaust. You will never achieve that power N/A
A VTS will struggle to see that N/A
hence theres several vts running over 200 on here n/a :S
to get a vtr there n/a it would be very peaky and have a very small poerband high in the revs
so would be hard to keep in the power
whats involved with supercharging it? is headwork nessecery? and does it require special fuelling?
headwork benefits it
youd need low comp pistons and an ecu to run it (its basically the same as a turbo setup for the motor itself and fueling)
VTSTomE
20th April 2009, 11:41
vtr's also have a lower compression than the 16v don't they to start with?
iw_laurence
20th April 2009, 11:42
oh ok, well ill get resaearching into it, any specific chargers used? or good websites/project threads to look at?
AlexB
20th April 2009, 11:49
vtr's also have a lower compression than the 16v don't they to start with?
iirc they run the samew pistons so id have thought the same compression but im not an expert on compression ratios
oh ok, well ill get resaearching into it, any specific chargers used? or good websites/project threads to look at?
gmc iirc sell supercharger kits that allmost just bolt on and map
VTEC-Saxo
20th April 2009, 11:58
are we talking about at the wheels or at the fly ? i hope not wheels lol! you will need a hell of a lot of money and a lot of work :D, best bets getting a forged 1.8 stroker kit for the vtr with a turbo maybe a t28 ? and nos muhaha
Ryan
20th April 2009, 12:26
iirc they run the samew pistons so id have thought the same compression but im not an expert on compression ratios
different pistons, hence why you cant use 16v head with 8v pistons as they will clash
RE the main question, boost is the only way on the 8v unless you have very deep pockets for a NA race engine
VtsTom
20th April 2009, 12:49
Theres a lad on the rallye reg with a s2 8v with a sandy brown/mark shillaber engine thats suppose to be 162 at the fly.
He has:
DTA ecu
QEP big valve ported 8v head
newmans phase 4 cam
catcam springs
16v bottom end with valve cut outs in the pistons 11.6:1 CR
Supersprint exhaust manifold and pug sport/scorpion system
SB inlet manifold and R1 bike bodies with larger injectors
IIRC it made 136 atw with sandy
Not bad for a touch over £3000 with mapping etc. BUT what could you get out of a 16v with £3k spent on it? Alot more user friendly power with scope for more is what
AlexB
20th April 2009, 12:51
different pistons, hence why you cant use 16v head with 8v pistons as they will clash
RE the main question, boost is the only way on the 8v unless you have very deep pockets for a NA race engine
see thats why i say im no expert on compressions lol
saxojamesb
20th April 2009, 13:01
dnt z cars do a honda engine conversion for the saxo
stephen34
20th April 2009, 14:20
vts engine and about 4-5 grand go tbs and cams and good remap its waht i am going to do next year and then work what else u need out :)
JamesR
20th April 2009, 14:39
vts engine and about 4-5 grand go tbs and cams and good remap its waht i am going to do next year and then work what else u need out :)
Read his first post :S
He doesnt want a VTS engine.
williamsvts
20th April 2009, 16:13
i dont get why people want to do things the hard way. just go 16v.
KamRacing
20th April 2009, 16:22
well some people prefer the lightweight of the 8v engine so you get a better balanced car.
Personally if the bore size is the same (i dont have any details to hand. I would ditch the vtr engine block, look at the rallye or 205 xs alloy block for lightness then fit all the parts VTStom mentioned.
16v is not the only answer.
I'm working out a lightweight engine for my car and it will cost a lot more than buying a vts engine, but sometimes theres more than just cost as a consideration.
iw_laurence
20th April 2009, 23:48
i was looking at the s1 rallye block with a wild cam and a bit of fettling with pistons/headwork. i know its easy to do the 16v conversion but i like to be a bit different... i think im going to get the running gear right then get a bit more out of the engine
vBulletin® v3.8.2, Copyright ©2000-2025, Jelsoft Enterprises Ltd.