PDA

View Full Version : 106 gti engine


reecebashford
1st August 2009, 12:05
my mate who owns a 106 gti, was told on the gti forum that the later gti engines had mre power than eariler models, i think he said that they have 130 instead of 120 bhp? i was just wondering fi this is true

thanks

LeeM
1st August 2009, 12:08
not true

Scott-jarvis
1st August 2009, 12:23
rubbishness, and GTI only came in phase 2 shape

Ashleyp
1st August 2009, 12:26
1998 gti onwards = leather seats
2000 gti onwards = 24mm rear arb

only differences made from when the gti began life in 1997

they have 134bhp per tonne iirc, but not 130 bhp ATF

saxokid100
1st August 2009, 13:01
rubbishness,:flamed:

Sparco_Tom
1st August 2009, 13:19
a load of rubbish. also before anyone says it the vts/gti is exactly the same engine so there for the mk2 vts doesnt have more than a mk1 vts

ollsaxogti
1st August 2009, 13:24
where do these rumors come from ? ? ! !

Sparco_Tom
1st August 2009, 13:26
un-educated individuals

saxokid100
1st August 2009, 13:49
un-educated individuals

Nice..........Lol...........:p

Olly
1st August 2009, 16:40
Ha! The later GTI's were 4 wheel drive too

Sparco_Tom
1st August 2009, 16:40
pppffftt hahaha nice one oli

blackie_2k5
1st August 2009, 16:53
the latter came with a foofoo valve= better! hahahahahah

Sparco_Tom
1st August 2009, 16:54
what about the heamaglobin-pull-back valves?

blackie_2k5
1st August 2009, 17:02
never thought about that mate, plus 1 2 tom!!

titchster
1st August 2009, 17:05
1998 gti onwards = leather seats
2000 gti onwards = 24mm rear arb

only differences made from when the gti began life in 1997

they have 134bhp per tonne iirc, but not 130 bhp ATF

Early GTis were 24mm ARB. Later were 22mm.
Think all had leathers as option, and later leathers had airbags.

blackie_2k5
1st August 2009, 17:10
Early GTis were 24mm ARB. Later were 22mm.
Think all had leathers as option, and later leathers had airbags.

always wondered this? why leathers and half leathers etc? for the gti? obviousley an option but was there a price diff? the gti is top of the range so it seem odd to ffer a lower budget? although it isnt uncommon these days

reecebashford
1st August 2009, 17:42
ah i thought not, the guy that said the later gtis had 130 bhp alsp reconed that one of theese '' later gti's '' would also make 150bhp with exhaust and induction

blackie_2k5
1st August 2009, 17:45
wish my vtr could bask 120 with sed mods

AlexB
2nd August 2009, 21:00
Early GTis were 24mm ARB. Later were 22mm.
Think all had leathers as option, and later leathers had airbags.

as far as ive seen all were 24mm

my 1997 r reg has 24
so does rushys (iirc an 02 behind r77 lol)

early leather (pre 99 iirc) has bigger bolsters than the later

CaldzieVTR
2nd August 2009, 21:30
i read a similer rumour on a "review" site that said later vts had 130bhp..... oddness

titchster
4th August 2009, 15:08
as far as ive seen all were 24mm

my 1997 r reg has 24
so does rushys (iirc an 02 behind r77 lol)

early leather (pre 99 iirc) has bigger bolsters than the later

After reading that (including saxp's very own yates), you can understand my confusion...
http://www.106owners.co.uk/forums/showthread.php?t=52731&highlight=arb+difference

sexy_gt
4th August 2009, 16:33
wasnt there a s16 gti? 130bhp :)

gouldy87
4th August 2009, 19:31
nobhead