View Full Version : 200 bhp ???
hammertoe
24th November 2009, 22:26
just read thread bout 300 bhp seems a pain so i would like apinions on the best way to get 200 bhp ???
saxmad88
24th November 2009, 22:29
200 will be na or boosted,
Na you will be at its highest tune
Where as turbo your be lowest tune and have a huge scope for more power. All depends what your gunna want after 200 bhp?
hammertoe
24th November 2009, 22:42
na ? never known what this ment lol
raunchz
24th November 2009, 22:44
naturally aspirated
TU-Tuning
24th November 2009, 22:45
Naturally Aspirated. EG, no form of forced induction such as a supercharger or turbo.
Have a search mate its been covered many times before :)
AlexB
24th November 2009, 22:45
naturally aspirated
so no boost just atmospheric air pressire
AlexB
24th November 2009, 22:45
naturally aspirated
so no boost just atmospheric air pressire
Paul
24th November 2009, 22:46
200 will be very hard to achieve NA.
Cheaper to go boosted if you want 200BHP on your drive to talk about in the pub.
JamesR
24th November 2009, 22:46
Again, boost will be easier to achieve that figure and probably cheaper tbh
But NA is achievable, Ryan's is around that :)
Ryan
24th November 2009, 23:25
Again, boost will be easier to achieve that figure and probably cheaper tbh
But NA is achievable, Ryan's is around that :)
on mildish cams compaired to what I could run.
Pushing it to 210-220+ will involve a decent box though so i cant be fucked
DusheR
25th November 2009, 22:47
Cammed vts with 50 shot of nitrous should get you near.
luthor1
25th November 2009, 23:23
Turbo FTW.
Obviously I love the purist N/A, but I'm a closet whore - my demonstrator is a Saxo, but my mistress is an MR2 Turbo. Boost boost BOOST.
Whatever way I slice it, I don't care if you have to wait a second out of a corner, when it arrives it is with such force it doesn't even owe you an apology for being late.
Andy
raunchz
25th November 2009, 23:32
Turbo FTW.
Obviously I love the purist N/A, but I'm a closet whore - my demonstrator is a Saxo, but my mistress is an MR2 Turbo. Boost boost BOOST.
Whatever way I slice it, I don't care if you have to wait a second out of a corner, when it arrives it is with such force it doesn't even owe you an apology for being late.
Andy
Put superbly!! True petrol head!
Lol@ closet whore
Ashleyp
25th November 2009, 23:51
luthor you dirty man ;)
KamRacing
26th November 2009, 10:58
if you are chasing big power then its a no brainer. Turbos make the job a lot cheaper.
If you are after finesse, then n/a is the way to go.
Both are pointless if your chassis cannot cope with the scenario you intend to use it for though...
Kev
hammertoe
26th November 2009, 17:13
so what could be expected if i had vts, cammed and throtle bodys ???
raunchz
26th November 2009, 17:48
around 160bhp - will depend on the cams
ATFoxy106
26th November 2009, 18:06
WELL ,, a basically tuned camed,TB'd engine will be putting out 150 easily, and 170 luckily,
it is possibly to get 220 out off a N/a 1.6GTI when we build the 1.4 16v saxo rally car we will be looking at N/A 160 bhp minimum
coleman258
26th November 2009, 18:09
Am i right in thinking a turbo is much more likely to eat parts like gear boxes? or does it all depend on how you build it?
coleman258
26th November 2009, 18:13
you probably couldn't even make toast
Tbh your a cunt.
KeithLemon
26th November 2009, 18:23
WELL ,, a basically tuned camed,TB'd engine will be putting out 150 easily, and 170 luckily,
it is possibly to get 220 out off a N/a 1.6GTI when we build the 1.4 16v saxo rally car we will be looking at N/A 160 bhp minimum
a 1.4 16v saxo engine?
didnt know there was such a thing
how do you plan to get 220? ive not seen any above 200 and thats the 1.6 16v done
raunchz
26th November 2009, 18:24
a 1.4 16v saxo engine?
didnt know there was such a thing
how do you plan to get 220? ive not seen any above 200 and thats the 1.6 16v done
It'e either a hybrid engine or one of the new ones with vvt iirc
raunchz
26th November 2009, 18:28
^ ^ looooooooooooooooooooooooooool
saxmad88
26th November 2009, 19:24
Am i right in thinking a turbo is much more likely to eat parts like gear boxes? or does it all depend on how you build it?
If you build it with the right spec parts it will be just as reliable as a standard car.
Ma type gearboxs become a problem when you go above 240 @ wheels, 3rd and 5th gear tend to shred themselves nicely. But this can be sorted by putting a be type gearbox in.
Ryan
27th November 2009, 18:53
a 1.4 16v saxo engine?
didnt know there was such a thing
how do you plan to get 220? ive not seen any above 200 and thats the 1.6 16v done
16v head on a modified bottom end.
Sandy brown has done it, as have several other cars in motorsport classes.
Lewis/bics engine made 207 on longmans dyno, 220 can be done most people tend to not go for really wild cams etc.. as they dont have a 6-8k sadev.
vBulletin® v3.8.2, Copyright ©2000-2025, Jelsoft Enterprises Ltd.