View Full Version : Battlefield 3 vs Call Of Duty MW3 Poll
GolfJay
21st November 2011, 20:18
Poll done by IGN over the past week or so.
Graphics
MW3: 22911
Battlefield 3: 96,767
Multiplayer
MW3: 31,183
Battlefield 3: 67,102
Campaign:
MW3: 35,246
Battlefield 3: 39,780
Total 292,988
MW3 got raped... :homme:
Gabbastard
21st November 2011, 21:20
Just finished the campaign of BF3, actually really enjoyed it. Playing it on hard this time round for the cheevy though.
Olly
21st November 2011, 21:29
must be ALOT of fags doing these polls.
CEdwards
21st November 2011, 22:41
must be ALOT of fags doing these polls.
+1
either this.. or they are just shit at CoD so they play Battlefield
Gabbastard
21st November 2011, 23:13
Ive found BF a lot more challenging to play. Used to regularly have a 2:1 k/d on games of cod. Seldom happens on BF though.
lukowski14
22nd November 2011, 01:47
i've got both and honestly think MW3 is better, both online and in campaign and that's despite telling people for months BF3 was going to destroy COD this year, i think i was wrong, but apparently not..
MickyWelsh172
22nd November 2011, 09:27
+1
either this.. or they are just shit at CoD so they play Battlefield
Serioulsy, how can you be shit at CoD? Find that impossible mate!
CEdwards
22nd November 2011, 13:07
Serioulsy, how can you be shit at CoD? Find that impossible mate!
How? lmao.
I join games and people are like 3-26.. pure shitters
Catfish
22nd November 2011, 13:33
battlefield 3 is better than mw3, played mw3 campain then online and thought it was utter shit, makes mw2 look like it came out after it! battlefield more playable becuase you have to put a right shift in on there. mw2 i prefered over battlefield bc2
Gandi699
22nd November 2011, 13:37
Battlefield will be about £20 in 4 months time, COD will still be £40 in 2 years time
Prickle
22nd November 2011, 13:38
Gay thread. Gay poll.
Gay.
GolfJay
22nd November 2011, 13:42
Gay thread. Gay poll.
Gay.
Gay member. Gay opinion. Gay comment lol
Prickle
22nd November 2011, 13:46
Gay member. Gay opinion. Gay comment lol
Re-read my post.
knight-22
22nd November 2011, 13:51
Battlefield will be about £20 in 4 months time, COD will still be £40 in 2 years time
That's because all the 12 year olds will keep buying cod, no matter how terrible the game actually is.
Allthough im not saying cod terrible... if you love getting randomly spawned in a cramped enviroment, then getting shot by some no-scoping dickhead stood in a corner with his perks. Its the game for you. :y:
To be honest they are completely different games. Cod's an unrealistic quickfire arcade game, whilst battlefield is verging much more on the realism side of things with a larger scale and more varied (i.e. vehicles/planes) warzone.
Bring the hate fanbouyzzzzzzzz :hug:
geraintthomas
22nd November 2011, 13:58
I played MW3 the other day - was actually a little disgusted on how much hype was built up on a game that looked and felt EXACTLY the same as its previous title. HUD, Perks, weapons, etc. It was the same!
They've put a huge amount into BF3, and with its Frostbite engine & amazing sounds, I think I'm going to have to go with BF3. MW3 is way over rated.
Juggyluggs
22nd November 2011, 14:17
i've come to realise that all cod is you spawn in a random place run around shoot get shot respawn and continue the cycle of boredom, where as BF3 has more a challenge to play online, and im not going to get some gimp screaming YOU STOLE MY KILL IM GOING TO HUNT YOU DOWN AND KILL YOU bit extreme on cod if you ask me whereas Bf3 i found that people are actually happy to have been helped
Bound
22nd November 2011, 14:19
I played MW3 the other day - was actually a little disgusted on how much hype was built up on a game that looked and felt EXACTLY the same as its previous title. HUD, Perks, weapons, etc. It was the same!
They've put a huge amount into BF3, and with its Frostbite engine & amazing sounds, I think I'm going to have to go with BF3. MW3 is way over rated.
How would you change MW3?
GolfJay
22nd November 2011, 14:24
How would you change MW3?
I'd have actually put something new in the game.
holdawayt
22nd November 2011, 14:24
Geeky thread is geeky
geraintthomas
22nd November 2011, 14:26
How would you change MW3?
I'd have actually put something new in the game.
Exactly.
Bound
22nd November 2011, 14:35
I'd have actually put something new in the game.
Exactly.
...Like...?
That's my problem with people not liking MW3 and saying "it's the same", you’re perfectly entitled to ofc lol.. and It sure is! But what would you change? Saying it's the same without knowing what you'd change is pretty pointless.. And it goes to show how hard it is to change a winning formula like COD where everything is trying to be balanced.. It is an FPS after all, arguably a purer FPS as there aren't the vehicles that they have in BF3 for example so they can't add that element.
I'm not a COD fanboy at all btw, I just don't understand this view.
There is already so much customisation for a FPS - primary gun you chose a gun perk, scope, attachment, camo, secondary gun, then you have 3 different perks, 2 different strike packages with assault and support options, tactical/lethal options, deathstreak etc. I don't mind that.. I will always rate IW games over Treyarch.. Imo MW1 was the best COD for online, but they really can't add much more without it getting silly imo. There's already like a billion gear combinations - starting to feel like an RPG! :p.
Prickle
22nd November 2011, 14:36
tbh most of you were aware it would be pretty similar, but you still bought it.
crymoar.
I play both but found MW3 more fun but BF3 has points like ninja killing, team work etc.
geraintthomas
22nd November 2011, 14:43
I was expecting something that looked a lot better, felt a lot fresher with more exiting features, but had the same ones. Yeah I see why they did it - if it was one of the best online games, then why change it? I just personally felt a little disappointed.
And John_G, I didn't buy it for that reason.
MickyWelsh172
22nd November 2011, 14:44
How? lmao.
I join games and people are like 3-26.. pure shitters
Just my opinion, the game is soo n00b friendly imo. I find it hard to do so bad, unless im stuck on 1 or 2 bar connections
holdawayt
22nd November 2011, 14:49
People who play Battlefield seem to have this ego boost that they're somehow better than mw3 players and it's fucking sad beyond belief. We both sit in a house staring at a monitor shooting people online. It's nothing to brag about.
"yeah but there's more tactics involved with BF3" Go you!! You sit there planning your game out with your e-friends and get more imaginary kills and take it so seriously it bothers you when a similar game is on the market.
Not a MW3 fanboy either. Wouldn't say I'm a fan boy of anything computer game related but this clique that bf3 makes you superior to others is like bragging about having b8's and strut braces.
MickyWelsh172
22nd November 2011, 14:50
..... Then there's the e-hardguys who come on a forum bitching about 'sad' gamers?
holdawayt
22nd November 2011, 14:53
..... Then there's the e-hardguys who come on a forum bitching about 'sad' gamers?
Come at me Br0
Lol how the hell am I playing the hardguy? I play xbox just as much as the OP. But I don't feel the need to post a thread up stating how my game is so much better than the competition.
MickyWelsh172
22nd November 2011, 14:53
My poor attempt at sarcasm... Neither game is better, each to their own tbh.
holdawayt
22nd November 2011, 14:54
I don't pick up on sarcasm easily, I apologise for the rant.
geraintthomas
22nd November 2011, 15:01
Thing is I don't care about the fight between the two - I was looking forward to both games as I thought they'd both be great for different reasons.
I'll probably still pick up MW3 as it does seem 'fun', it's just I was hugely disappointed with it :/
MickyWelsh172
22nd November 2011, 15:03
yeah tbh its fun, because its so easy to just run around spraying, or other end of the scale, just sat in cover with snipers, and what the fucks that trophey system all about? Talk about weapon balance etc, Noob tube was only counter to campers hiding in windows etc, and now you cant tube them, lol.
Bound
22nd November 2011, 15:45
People who play Battlefield seem to have this ego boost that they're somehow better than mw3 players and it's fucking sad beyond belief. We both sit in a house staring at a monitor shooting people online. It's nothing to brag about.
"yeah but there's more tactics involved with BF3" Go you!! You sit there planning your game out with your e-friends and get more imaginary kills and take it so seriously it bothers you when a similar game is on the market.
This is so true.
knight-22
22nd November 2011, 16:00
People who play Battlefield seem to have this ego boost that they're somehow better than mw3 players and it's fucking sad beyond belief. We both sit in a house staring at a monitor shooting people online. It's nothing to brag about.
"yeah but there's more tactics involved with BF3" Go you!! You sit there planning your game out with your e-friends and get more imaginary kills and take it so seriously it bothers you when a similar game is on the market.
Not a MW3 fanboy either. Wouldn't say I'm a fan boy of anything computer game related but this clique that bf3 makes you superior to others is like bragging about having b8's and strut braces.
Typical MW3 player...
I joke. I joke.
Prickle
22nd November 2011, 16:01
..... Then there's the e-hardguys who come on a forum bitching about 'sad' gamers?
Typical MW3 player...
I joke. I joke.
:homme: you dont rly..
holdawayt
22nd November 2011, 16:04
Oh you guys :homme:
saxova
22nd November 2011, 16:28
Quote;
'Battlefield 3's awe-inspiring tank battle demonstration at E3 was run on a PC, and it wasn't to make a statement about mouse-and-keyboard superiority. The game, according to developer DICE, will run at 60 frames per second on the PC—but 30 fps on the Xbox 360 and PS3.
Call of Duty's latest entries run at 60 fps, both PC and console, to deliver that smoove gameplay. Of course, Battlefield 3 is touting a higher level of visual detail, including fully destructible environments, larger maps, etc.
While 30 fps sounds pretty crap, this isn't unprecedented; Crysis 2 ran at 30 fps on consoles. And Battlefield 3's PS3 demonstration, in Luke's eyes, was still pretty good-looking.
To repeat, Battlefield 3 is 60 fps on the PC, which it had better goddamn well be. I don't want to imagine the rioting if it were anything less. Such things matter intensely to the glorious PC gaming master race. Do they matter for the console peasants?'
That is all :A:.
GolfJay
23rd November 2011, 00:59
I don't think I'm better than MW3 players at all.
What I think is that I play a better game. I really do not understand why anyone could think MW3 is better than BF3. I can't help but think that MW3 players have bought nothing but a frigging expensive add-on.
I mean, what have you got that's new? Guns? Perks? Maps? Game modes? All of which are being released for BF3 in an add-on.
I think one statement in almost every review says the same thing." The COD engine is looking old and showing its age"
McGuire86
23rd November 2011, 01:35
At end of the day who gives a fuck what game is 'better' in their opinion.
If you enjoy playing that's all what matters.
I had BF2 on the pc and the graphics would rape the Xbox. The game was very good but for me, it drags out too long, too much time consuming and bullshit.
I prefer to stick on the Xbox and have a few quick games on COD multi-player which I find much more enjoyable. I simply don't have the time or can't be fucked to sit at a game for hours on end just to complete 1 game.
MickyWelsh172
23rd November 2011, 11:36
Agree with McGuire, neither game is 'better', its all about personal opinion.
holdawayt
23rd November 2011, 11:43
Scottish shincloth
Brettles1986
23rd November 2011, 11:51
Lets be brutally honest here, If your shit at MW3 then you don't like it, If your shit at BF3 then you don't like it.................... you need to up your game y0
MickyWelsh172
23rd November 2011, 11:54
So true mate
holdawayt
23rd November 2011, 12:13
A paraplegic aids infested manatee with an addiction to windows would've killed more bad guys than I managed on Bf. I had fun flying the jets though.
knight-22
23rd November 2011, 12:19
Lets be brutally honest here, If your shit at MW3 then you don't like it, If your shit at BF3 then you don't like it.................... you need to up your game y0
Not necessarily lad, ill allways be top 3 with a decent k/d on cod, i just cant stand the game. Just personal opinion.
That is all :A:.
hahaha Yeah lets get the lads round and all takes turns swapping seats on my pc... Everyone knows the only decent game for playing on pc, is minesweeper.
Also how much monies does it cost to actually get a decent spec computer, able to run battlefield maximum settings, with no problems? More than a console costs. :homme:
Bound
23rd November 2011, 13:54
Not necessarily lad, ill allways be top 3 with a decent k/d on cod, i just cant stand the game. Just personal opinion.
hahaha Yeah lets get the lads round and all takes turns swapping seats on my pc... Everyone knows the only decent game for playing on pc, is minesweeper.
Also how much monies does it cost to actually get a decent spec computer, able to run battlefield maximum settings, with no problems? More than a console costs. :homme:
Bout £300. Not really a fair comparison because a console runs games like shit compared to a PC. FPS are better on PC, if I could use keyboard and mouse on Xbox it would be rape. Also gotta remember a console can only be a console, a PC can do everything.. So 'value' ain't exactly fair.
ChAdS
26th November 2011, 15:44
team work.
What is this you speak of?
Prickle
26th November 2011, 15:53
What is this you speak of?
if you read my post it was regarding BF3.
;)
ChAdS
26th November 2011, 16:24
BF3 is awful, Camping fuckers in bushes laying down etc. MW3 is awesome nade launcher,RPG,semtex. You are set and on a winner! BOOM!
W103_A5H
27th November 2011, 12:39
This thread is what i like, to see all the cod fanboys get shat all over! Just proves BF3 is the better game. Tanks, jeeps, helicopters, jets, big maps, destruction, looks and sounds realistic, squad function so you can work in a team with your mates and is just an all round better game as you have to work in teams not just go round n00bing eachother like you get in cod.
Also what is amusing is i can sit and play BF with no problems and my stepdad will be playing cod and constantly gets kicked out the games because the servers are so shit!
Bound
27th November 2011, 14:33
This thread is what i like, to see all the cod fanboys get shat all over! Just proves BF3 is the better game. Tanks, jeeps, helicopters, jets, big maps, destruction, looks and sounds realistic, squad function so you can work in a team with your mates and is just an all round better game as you have to work in teams not just go round n00bing eachother like you get in cod.
Also what is amusing is i can sit and play BF with no problems and my stepdad will be playing cod and constantly gets kicked out the games because the servers are so shit!
Dude, no one but the battlefield players care what the 'better game' is, only the BF players seem to be more desperate to reassure themselves and everyone else it's the better game?
I've never had any problems on COD.. With lag, 'hacking', camping, anything.
GolfJay
27th November 2011, 14:45
BF3 is awful, Camping fuckers in bushes laying down etc. MW3 is awesome nade launcher,RPG,semtex. You are set and on a winner! BOOM!
Everything that is wrong. Its called a Noob Tube for a reason!
vBulletin® v3.8.2, Copyright ©2000-2025, Jelsoft Enterprises Ltd.