View Full Version : what clutch is better valeo vs LUK
boarer2004
15th February 2012, 11:57
as above whats the difference between these two brands , price , value for money , how they feel , and any personal preference you may have ??
xsi16v
15th February 2012, 12:10
I always fit valeo and thats whats fitted as standard. Not sure on price difference but you can pick valeo ones up for £70-£90 so its not breaking the bank for a quaility part!
Monkgti
15th February 2012, 12:48
i put a luk one in my 106 before and it didnt have the same boie as the valeo atall, when doggin it through the gears it didnt have as solid a bite on each change if ya get me and when i was doin the box about 2 months later the release bearing had wore half way into the pressure plate so i changed it to a valeo and it was way better, always a solid bite through the gears, also put valeo in my gti6 and never had a problem either!
boarer2004
15th February 2012, 13:02
Thanks guys Valeo it is
Gabbastard
15th February 2012, 13:02
Used both and never had a problem, but given the small price difference, I always choose Valeo now.
NickB4
16th February 2012, 21:59
Valeo is better, I know some guys in the Netherlands use a 180mm valeo on a 16v in their rally cars.
I drive normal road and managed to destroy a 180mm Luk (metal into pieces, springs everywhere) after 200km..
They say it should not happen with the valeo, but i wanted to be shure so changed to a 200mm clutch (lost some engine speed :( ).
charrr
16th February 2012, 22:13
valeo...
SAXO8VYO
16th February 2012, 23:47
i heard a few bad things about the luk ones just go for the oem part which is valeo
Stuart85VTR
16th February 2012, 23:50
Definitely valeo :y:
boarer2004
18th February 2012, 23:52
Thanks guys an the Valeo is cheaper so better all around
vBulletin® v3.8.2, Copyright ©2000-2025, Jelsoft Enterprises Ltd.