View Full Version : All Look!!!
jonnyshaw89
27th November 2006, 22:34
hey all,
im a physics student and am studying airflow and downforce etc.
and was just wondering if anyone had tried putting a completly flat panel under there car so the bottom is completely smooth.
like a pices of carbon fibre or something that covers the entire underneath of the car from front bumper to back bumper and from side to side?
would be interested to know if anyone has? because the laws of physics tell us that the car would stick too the ground like fuck and would speed the air passing by the car to enable higher speeds to be reached.
Jonny
S34MER
27th November 2006, 22:39
:dweeb: another science geek! lol :geek:
Only messing mate, sounds very interesting, can't say i've ever heard of anyone ever doing it though, i would imagine there is a reason why no-one has done it though!
im not saying your wrong, but would you please explain to me why the car would stick like fu*k to the road? im interested to hear this!
jonnyshaw89
27th November 2006, 22:40
it is done on ferrari's and lambos!!!
it makes the air flow faster under the car which pulls it down to the ground.
williamsvts
27th November 2006, 22:41
most poeple dont have much ground clearance though so a flat sheet under the car could smaah on normal roads.
S34MER
27th November 2006, 22:41
it is done on ferrari's and lambos!!!
it makes the air flow faster under the car which pulls it down to the ground.
i know that but EXPLAIN HOW it does that?! in technical terms!
VTaaRon
27th November 2006, 22:42
id have thought it would cause the car to lift if air is forced under the car as you drive surely air pressure under the car is higher i think it would only be noticable if the car was insanly low and had a good air flow over the top of the car like an F1
SNewham
27th November 2006, 22:43
It's a good theory, however if not done properly and the air is allowed to be forced up inside the otherside of the "downforce sheet?" then it would more than likely rip it off and be destroyed :P
SNewham
27th November 2006, 22:44
i know that but EXPLAIN HOW it does that?! in technical terms!
bloody hell, where's Adsayer when you need him...
banned as usual "NOOB"
VTaaRon
27th November 2006, 22:45
i know that but EXPLAIN HOW it does that?! in technical terms!
i dont think it has that much to do with the underside mate think its the flow over the top forces the car down the flat underside creates a lift rather than a down force to counteract the force of the overflow and stop the car being grounded?! just my theory
hesslevtr
27th November 2006, 22:45
its only a bloody saxo
jonnyshaw89
27th November 2006, 22:45
no it will make the car flow faster under the car then over the car creating a kind of vaccum.
it works trust!!
saxodan
27th November 2006, 22:46
its only a bloody saxo
:clapping: best post ive seena all day
VTaaRon
27th November 2006, 22:46
ok you do it so we can have a laugh!
jonnyshaw89
27th November 2006, 22:47
http://images.google.co.uk/images?q=tbn:9UjERDpL3HPUFM:http://www.thewarfields.com/OldSite/images/Bottom.JPG
S34MER
27th November 2006, 22:51
http://images.google.co.uk/images?q=tbn:9UjERDpL3HPUFM:http://www.thewarfields.com/OldSite/images/Bottom.JPG
thats about the size of a peanut, how the hell can we see that!?
saxodan
27th November 2006, 22:52
thats about the size of a peanut, how the hell can we see that!?
sounds familiar..
SNewham
27th November 2006, 22:52
http://images.google.co.uk/images?q=tbn:9UjERDpL3HPUFM:http://www.thewarfields.com/OldSite/images/Bottom.JPG
isn't that one of those diecast matchbox cars? surely they have to be made like that. Don't think they really think about airflow when designing them.
SNewham
27th November 2006, 22:53
sounds familiar..
haha :oops:
jonnyshaw89
27th November 2006, 22:53
so ummm
anyone know where i can get a very large piece of carbon fibre??
lol
Mystic
27th November 2006, 22:53
Um, thats like a wind-up car.
My mate has a Mitsubishi GTO TT, the underside of their engine bay is smooth plastic, its also got an 'aero spoiler' which lowers the the smooth part, reducing the ground clearence.
SNewham
27th November 2006, 22:53
so ummm
anyone know where i can get a very large piece of carbon fibre??
lol
www.carbonfibre.com
S34MER
27th November 2006, 22:54
sounds familiar..
lol :fcuk:
saxodan
27th November 2006, 22:54
so ummm
anyone know where i can get a very large piece of carbon fibre??
lol
b&q
bit of mdf
SNewham
27th November 2006, 22:54
b&q
bit of mdf
I heard 12mm is best for this.
saxodan
27th November 2006, 22:55
I heard 12mm is best for this.
Depends if the fogs are on
jonnyshaw89
27th November 2006, 22:57
wht u mean bout the fogs?
S34MER
27th November 2006, 22:57
wht u mean bout the fogs?
forget it mate, there taking the pish!! :P
SNewham
27th November 2006, 22:58
it works trust!!
Nice scientific conclusion, you should do well :thumbup:
saxodan
27th November 2006, 22:59
*if a car is travelling at the speed of light and it turns his lights on what will happen*
hmmm
SNewham
27th November 2006, 23:01
an object cannot travel at the speed of light because it has a mass.
S34MER
27th November 2006, 23:03
*if a car is travelling at the speed of light and it turns his lights on what will happen*
hmmm
what cars do you know that can travel at the speed of light which is 186,000 miles/second if im not wrong! lol if i am im sure mr physics boy will correct me! :P
jonnyshaw89
27th November 2006, 23:04
woo another guy who knows wht there on about
saxodan
27th November 2006, 23:05
what cars do you know that can travel at the speed of light
the 1.1 is pretty nippy once its warmed up
chloesax
27th November 2006, 23:05
ooooohhhhhhhh... did someone say physics, science and airflow in the say sentence??? i've just creamed.
jonnyshaw89
27th November 2006, 23:05
it certianly is
chloesax
27th November 2006, 23:06
who wants the low down on this smooth floors and stuff???
saxodan
27th November 2006, 23:06
an object cannot travel at the speed of light because it has a mass.
Untrue :homme:
Everything has a mass even light photon particles
SNewham
27th November 2006, 23:07
the 1.1 is pretty nippy once its warmed up
nippy and fast are two different things ;) This car is so bloody slow, I put my foot down and I have to pray that it will accelerate quick enough for me to not be humiliated by the BMW right up my arse as I try to overtake a 40mph larda on the left.
jaybiss
27th November 2006, 23:07
me chloe
add me to msn ;)
love you long time
chloesax
27th November 2006, 23:07
depends if we're talking about wave particle duality mofmo ;)
jonnyshaw89
27th November 2006, 23:07
:fcuk: who wants the low down on this smooth floors and stuff???
give it to us :fcuk:
chloesax
27th November 2006, 23:08
me chloe
add me to msn ;)
love you long time
love to kick your ass long time mate.
SNewham
27th November 2006, 23:08
Untrue :homme:
Everything has a mass even light photon particles
no that's where you are wrong photon particles do not have a mass they just have momentum ;)
SNewham
27th November 2006, 23:09
GCSE physics - A
A-Level physics- D. great stuff. lmao...
saxodan
27th November 2006, 23:10
depends if we're talking about wave particle duality mofmo ;)
Were not talking about waves and particles so why would that matter?
And is light can be deflected in a wind tunnel by variations in air pressure, which wouldresult in variations in refractive index, thus meaning it has a mass ;)
S34MER
27th November 2006, 23:10
this thread is full of nerds :geek: lol im off i feel outta place haha :P
jonnyshaw89
27th November 2006, 23:10
GCSE physics - A*
A-Level physics - A
saxodan
27th November 2006, 23:10
no that's where you are wrong photon particles do not have a mass they just have momentum ;)
read my last post mofo
this is getting quantum
SNewham
27th November 2006, 23:13
GCSE physics - A*
A-Level physics - A
Willy size - Ungraded
chloesax
27th November 2006, 23:13
:fcuk:
give it to us :fcuk:
righty... we can describe air flow into two parts:
Laminar flow - straight flow
And turbulent flow - messy flow
Turbulent flow is bad for aerodynamics as its high drag compared with laminar. high drag obviously blows so we dont wanna go there. now imagine flow over a plate (imagine the underside of a saxo) quite lumpy and can be considered not very smooth. this promotes the originally laminar flow to go into turbulent flow and thus high drag again. Now replace that underside with a super smooth plate... this DELAYS (note delays... it doesnt remove) the turbulent flow and thus the overal drag is reduced.
canna get a bo?
SNewham
27th November 2006, 23:13
k that wasn't very nice sorry loll :P
saxodan
27th November 2006, 23:15
and back to light-
electromagnetic wave (=EMW) does not carry mass, but carries energy
So, this seems to prove that light has mass.The general
conception is - however - that EMW have no mass.
The famous Einsteinīs equation E=m.c^2 shows us
that mass is a very concentrated form of energy, as you
know. And EMW is energy.
OWNED
as for the areodynamic shizzle i got sent out that lesson for being a nob
chloesax
27th November 2006, 23:16
also we can geek further by talking about 'boundry layer flows', 'compressible flows, 'incompressible flows' yada yada
But im watch Ch5 so it can wait.
chloesax
27th November 2006, 23:17
and back to light-
electromagnetic wave (=EMW) does not carry mass, but carries energy
So, this seems to prove that light has mass.The general
conception is - however - that EMW have no mass.
The famous Einsteinīs equation E=m.c^2 shows us
that mass is a very concentrated form of energy, as you
know. And EMW is energy.
OWNED
as for the areodynamic shizzle i got sent out that lesson for being a nob
energy and electrons mean nothing to you then?
SNewham
27th November 2006, 23:17
and back to light-
electromagnetic wave (=EMW) does not carry mass, but carries energy
So, this seems to prove that light has mass.The general
conception is - however - that EMW have no mass.
The famous Einsteinīs equation E=m.c^2 shows us
that mass is a very concentrated form of energy, as you
know. And EMW is energy.
OWNED
as for the areodynamic shizzle i got sent out that lesson for being a nob
lol man you must be a really talented physician. lmao
saxodan
27th November 2006, 23:17
also we can geek further by talking about 'boundry layer flows', 'compressible flows, 'incompressible flows' yada yada
But im watch Ch5 so it can wait.
why did i chose a computer course :( I miss science
ah well that was a fun mass debate
im of to do some work
laters mofos and drive safe
jonnyshaw89
27th November 2006, 23:17
see i was right all along!!!
all u who doubted should be shamed!!!
lol
cheers chloe!!!
SNewham
27th November 2006, 23:18
How the hell can you think that light has a mass? the theory of relativity would be smashed if that was the case... Light has no mass.
chloesax
27th November 2006, 23:19
no probs sexyboy x x x
SNewham
27th November 2006, 23:19
see i was right all along!!!
all u who doubted should be shamed!!!
lol
cheers chloe!!!
never doubted but definetely wouldnt do it to saxo lol.
chloesax
27th November 2006, 23:19
How the hell can you think that light has a mass? the theory of relativity would be smashed if that was the case... Light has no mass.
wave particle duality (again)
Mystic
27th November 2006, 23:20
yah yah yah, i done A-level physics too so shnizzle. On topgear they put duct tape over all the places where there were imperfections in shell of a car. i.e. everywhere panels, windows, doors meet etc. It had a pretty substantial effect on the aerodynamics of the car.
So i say, lets put the books away and go get to work with the gaffer tape! :D:
SNewham
27th November 2006, 23:20
no probs sexyboy x x x
you just met him like 5 mins ago. nice one add me to msn hun :oops:
jonnyshaw89
27th November 2006, 23:22
they cant resist :P
see buy a saxo 1.1 and girls think u got a big cock
SNewham
27th November 2006, 23:25
wave particle duality (again)
yes I wasn't doubting the fact that they can sometimes appear as a wave and aparticle, however that does't prove the point that they have a mass. Maybe you are referrring to the relativistic mass and not actually the rest mass.
really scraping the can empty here.
SNewham
27th November 2006, 23:25
they cant resist :P
see buy a saxo 1.1 and girls think u got a big cock
of course, they like a bit of 4 inch inwardly rolled sportex as well
jonnyshaw89
27th November 2006, 23:27
lol classic
RAFkev
28th November 2006, 18:04
back to the sucking to the floor idea -
gotta talk aircraft principles here - planes fly cos the air across the upper surface of a wing moves faster than the air across the lower surface. this gives a lower pressure on the upper surface (faster moving air) creating lift. once the pressure difference is sufficient (above a certain air-speed) the plane takes off. my point is, if the air is sped up under the car (from less drag due to a plate covering everythin) the faster moving air should create a lower air pressure hence pulling the car to the ground. whether a saxo could reach a speed where the pressure would be enough to actually make this happen is anyones guess!! my guess is no!!
sy_VTR
28th November 2006, 18:17
i dont know much about physics, but i would of thought by putting a panel under the car, it will just balance the air flow under the car, as a normal car will have all the exhaust and bits of things that will disturb the air flow under the car,(because the air will catch all the pipework and stuff) dont think it is will hold it down, thinks its just to create even air flow under the car. i could be wrong but thats my theory!
saxoash
28th November 2006, 19:09
nice bit of reading :Y:
Just to tell you guys if you didnt know Chloesax is a ladyboy btw lol!
uppitysi
29th November 2006, 10:21
wave particle duality (again)
a girl with brains, good girl
Skorpion
29th November 2006, 11:46
:gives:
vBulletin® v3.8.2, Copyright ©2000-2025, Jelsoft Enterprises Ltd.