| General Chat... This forum is for general chit-chat, banter, exchange of information, etc. Pretty much everything goes... within reason! |
 |
|
16th July 2008, 23:38
|
#1
|
|
Established Member
Join Date: May 2008
Location: north east
Posts: 1,415
Car(s): 2002 saxo vts
|
new car
hi ya going to test drive new car have had credit and fiance down all ok its a 55 plate c2 vts what all use think of them are they quick and are they a good car to have if i like it can have it by monday :-) so excited for test drive
__________________
2002 saxo vts
|
|
|
|
16th July 2008, 23:39
|
#2
|
|
Super Moderator
Join Date: Feb 2004
Location: Tonbridge United Kingdom (England)
Posts: 38,236
Car(s): Vtr, 172, throttle bodied track slut
|
c2. = barge.
__________________
God made beer, women and Throttle bodies 
|
|
|
|
|
16th July 2008, 23:40
|
#3
|
|
Saxperience Post Whore
Join Date: Jul 2007
Location: Verwood
Posts: 5,217
Car(s): 53 Renault Clio 1.2 16v
|
Good luck mate, a little hard to understand some of what you've put there lol
|
|
|
|
|
16th July 2008, 23:41
|
#4
|
|
Established Member
Join Date: May 2008
Location: north east
Posts: 1,415
Car(s): 2002 saxo vts
|
basacily im going to test drive c2 vts as may get it tommorow wat use all reckon on them
__________________
2002 saxo vts
|
|
|
|
|
16th July 2008, 23:41
|
#5
|
|
Saxperience Post Whore
Join Date: Jan 2006
Posts: 9,363
Car(s): Focus ST
& 206 GTI180
|
They look nice but i dont think they are quick, Theyre nice i just think theres better cars
Depends on what you want from it,
Id get a fezzy ST probably just as much to insure lol
|
|
|
|
|
16th July 2008, 23:42
|
#6
|
|
Saxperience Addict
Join Date: Sep 2004
Location: Warrington, Cheshire
Posts: 11,649
Car(s): FN2 Civic Type-R
|
from what i have heard the c2 vts arnt all that really and there quite slow
|
|
|
|
|
16th July 2008, 23:42
|
#7
|
|
Established Member
Join Date: May 2008
Location: north east
Posts: 1,415
Car(s): 2002 saxo vts
|
what bhp are they
__________________
2002 saxo vts
|
|
|
|
|
16th July 2008, 23:44
|
#8
|
|
Saxperience Hardcore!
Join Date: Nov 2007
Location: Guantanamo Bay
Posts: 28,700
Car(s): oyster card
|
they are very slow! a saxo walkes all over it, and my lil 1.4 can almost keep up with them! they go like a saxo VTR with a few mods like manifold lol!
__________________
|
|
|
|
|
16th July 2008, 23:44
|
#9
|
|
Saxperience Post Whore
Join Date: Jan 2006
Posts: 9,363
Car(s): Focus ST
& 206 GTI180
|
same as saxo, iirc but more weight so about as fast as a Sax VT*
Infact im pretty sure i beat one in my old R
|
|
|
|
|
16th July 2008, 23:44
|
#10
|
|
Established Member
Join Date: May 2008
Location: north east
Posts: 1,415
Car(s): 2002 saxo vts
|
seriously
__________________
2002 saxo vts
|
|
|
|
|
16th July 2008, 23:46
|
#11
|
|
Saxperience Post Whore
Join Date: Jan 2006
Posts: 9,363
Car(s): Focus ST
& 206 GTI180
|
Yep, swear they have saxo engines but in a beefy car, all that weight and small engine = slowwwwwwwww coach
|
|
|
|
|
16th July 2008, 23:46
|
#12
|
|
Super Moderator
Join Date: Feb 2004
Location: Tonbridge United Kingdom (England)
Posts: 38,236
Car(s): Vtr, 172, throttle bodied track slut
|
they use an updated engine that was in the saxo.
Slightly different but from the JP- range (TU)
__________________
God made beer, women and Throttle bodies
|
|
|
|
|
16th July 2008, 23:47
|
#13
|
|
Established Member
Join Date: May 2008
Location: north east
Posts: 1,415
Car(s): 2002 saxo vts
|
vts c2 standard is sitting at 125bhp
__________________
2002 saxo vts
|
|
|
|
|
16th July 2008, 23:48
|
#14
|
|
Super Moderator
Join Date: Feb 2004
Location: Tonbridge United Kingdom (England)
Posts: 38,236
Car(s): Vtr, 172, throttle bodied track slut
|
and a kerb weight about 400 kg more than a saxo 
__________________
God made beer, women and Throttle bodies
|
|
|
|
|
16th July 2008, 23:50
|
#15
|
|
Saxperience Post Whore
Join Date: Jan 2006
Posts: 9,363
Car(s): Focus ST
& 206 GTI180
|
Mate, if your not looking for speed its a good car  lol
|
|
|
|
|
16th July 2008, 23:50
|
#16
|
|
Established Member
Join Date: May 2008
Location: north east
Posts: 1,415
Car(s): 2002 saxo vts
|
so would u say a vts c2 is slower than a saxo vts
__________________
2002 saxo vts
|
|
|
|
|
16th July 2008, 23:51
|
#17
|
|
Saxperience Hardcore!
Join Date: Nov 2007
Location: Guantanamo Bay
Posts: 28,700
Car(s): oyster card
|
Quote:
Originally Posted by tease1986
so would u say a vts c2 is slower than a saxo vts
|
definatly, c2's are poodles
__________________
|
|
|
|
|
16th July 2008, 23:51
|
#18
|
|
Established Member
Join Date: May 2008
Location: north east
Posts: 1,415
Car(s): 2002 saxo vts
|
i havea furio at min so obviously its going to be much better tho
__________________
2002 saxo vts
|
|
|
|
|
16th July 2008, 23:52
|
#19
|
|
Saxperience Hardcore!
Join Date: Nov 2007
Location: Guantanamo Bay
Posts: 28,700
Car(s): oyster card
|
Quote:
Originally Posted by tease1986
i havea furio at min so obviously its going to be much better tho
|
not really mate, like i say my westcoast kept up with one pretty well, i thought i was a vtr c2 untill my mate in front told me it was a vts!
i say kept up, it obv was a tad quicker, but my westcoast didnt let it run away!
__________________
|
|
|
|
|
16th July 2008, 23:53
|
#20
|
|
Saxperience Post Whore
Join Date: Jan 2006
Posts: 9,363
Car(s): Focus ST
& 206 GTI180
|
Quote:
Originally Posted by tease1986
so would u say a vts c2 is slower than a saxo vts
|
Lmao, if i compare it to a vtr, and a vts would absolutely destroy a r lol what do you think 
a Modded C2 Vts , exhaust, manifold, induction kit would still be eaten by a std saxo vts..
|
|
|
|
Posting Rules
|
You may not post new threads
You may not post replies
You may not post attachments
You may not edit your posts
HTML code is Off
|
|
|
All times are GMT. The time now is 16:55.
|
Linear Mode
