Whats the problem with 6x9â€™s - Saxperience

Dino209 · 23rd July 2005, 18:55

i see alot of people slagging them off but i don't know what so bad about em ?

Scott^p · 23rd July 2005, 19:05

better off you tell me whats good about them? not a lot but lets hear it, why do people think 6x9s are good?

Yates · 23rd July 2005, 19:06

i dont mind them, dont have em no more tho i jus run of the standard back speakers

performance wise people say they are shit, but if u just want it ok then i think they are fine, if ur gona go all out on ice n that, then get better back speakers

Dino209 · 23rd July 2005, 19:40

like what ones though?

Bakersaxo · 23rd July 2005, 21:27

components, far better to mount someting like 16.5cm speakers on the rear shelf

Propagand · 23rd July 2005, 21:43

Perhaps people slags 6x9 cause it's very hard to mount them in the dash.

First of all, backspeakers are crap!

Do you sit on a concert back towards the band? No, I don't think you do

Backspeakers just confuses soundimage.

And what comes in the 6x9. I've never heard a pair of 6x9 wich sounds good. Those "3-way" or even "5-way" speakers just don't work how they supposed to work. Lot's of shitty sounding bass, tweeter shouting on your ears and midrange sounds like shit.

Second, If I had 6x9 speakers, I would remove the tweeter and midrange from them and use them as freeair subs IF they could repeat low frequencys. I've never seen pair wich can so.. And the bass which comes out from the 6x9 sounds almost always like crap with the other sounds it produces.

If someone makes GOOD pair of 6x9 midbass or sub, I think I would test them in my car. 6x9 is quite big speaker so it's quite hard to mount in saxos door but what the hell, I've mounted 6,5". Why wouldn't I trie 6"x9"

And what comes to the 6x9 in sub use, 6x9s conediameter (or what's the word. Surface area or something) along with the xmax won't be big enough to produce low frequencys with big enough soundpressure.

This is just my opinion.
Sorry for the bad english..

Scott^p · 23rd July 2005, 22:33

pretty good summation mate, great english to

Yates · 23rd July 2005, 22:41

its everyones opinions, 6x9s are better than the standard back speakers, so if people wana get them they can! personally i dont think they are bad at all i had them in mine and it sounded just fine, fair enuf half or ur cars wil have better quality sound, but mine stil sounds good on standard back speakers and sounded fine on 6x9s

Scott^p · 23rd July 2005, 22:48

of course people can get them if they want to, who said they couldnt.

BUT why waste your money on something inferior

andy51086 · 23rd July 2005, 23:16

its just a speaker

Scott^p · 23rd July 2005, 23:22

Bravo.

Some of us like better speakers than others.

RyanBeattie · 23rd July 2005, 23:52

agree with most of scott and propagand's comments as per usual... propagand summed it up pretty well i think,

completely agree with scott.... why pay 60 quid for a set of "decent" (i use that term with a pinch of salt) 6x9's when you can get a real decent set of components for the front for 70 quid which will give you much clearer, louder and distortion free sound?

Propagand · 24th July 2005, 16:54

Quote:

Originally Posted by yate5y

its everyones opinions, 6x9s are better than the standard back speakers, so if people wana get them they can! personally i dont think they are bad at all i had them in mine and it sounded just fine, fair enuf half or ur cars wil have better quality sound, but mine stil sounds good on standard back speakers and sounded fine on 6x9s

I forgotted something..

If you wan't to waste your money and mess your sound image, it's fine by me

I don't care

But there's more important things you can waste that money, example save that money and buy good headunit, like alpine with time correction and you can enjoy the fruits of stereo image

darrensvtr · 25th July 2005, 04:04

fuck it just get a lush custom exhaust,wind ya window down and listen to that.lol