Mobile Devices: Lite Theme Citroën: Citroën Trader | Saxo Trader | C2 Trader Peugeot: Peugeot Trader | 106 Trader Enthusiast: Saxperience


Go Back   Saxperience - Citroen Saxo Forum > Citroen Saxo Related Forums > Saxo Engine/Performance
Register Member Photo AlbumsBlogs FAQ Calendar Experience

Saxo Engine/Performance If you're interested in tuning Saxo engines, or if you need to know something which is engine related... this is the place for you.

Reply
 
Thread Tools Display Modes
Old 29th March 2015, 21:22   #1
prittvtr
Newbie
 
Join Date: Mar 2015
Location: Luton
Posts: 29
Car(s): too many
prittvtr is on a distinguished road
Talking urgent! would this engine fit

thinking of something different with ma saxo as everyone seems to do the same old stuff with jus doing slight engine mods etc...

come across a peeeeejot 205 gti 1.6 complete engine

now one would this fit and two what do u recon
prittvtr is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 29th March 2015, 21:44   #2
Jack_Norris
Regular Poster
 
Jack_Norris's Avatar
 
Join Date: Feb 2012
Location: Canvey Island
Posts: 381
Car(s): 2 16'v Saxo vtr's
iTrader Score: 3 (100%)
Jack_Norris is on a distinguished road
Default

Its not a straight fit. You can make it fit if you have the budget.
Jack_Norris is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 29th March 2015, 21:48   #3
prittvtr
Newbie
 
Join Date: Mar 2015
Location: Luton
Posts: 29
Car(s): too many
prittvtr is on a distinguished road
Default

in your opinion what roughly would u say is the budget
prittvtr is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 29th March 2015, 22:51   #4
Jack_Norris
Regular Poster
 
Jack_Norris's Avatar
 
Join Date: Feb 2012
Location: Canvey Island
Posts: 381
Car(s): 2 16'v Saxo vtr's
iTrader Score: 3 (100%)
Jack_Norris is on a distinguished road
Default

No idea to be honest. But surely after all the effort with fabricating mounts, loom work etc. (not very savvy with this stuff) you could get a JP4S engine that would be a much better base to go with over a older 205 engine.
Jack_Norris is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 29th March 2015, 23:01   #5
willsy
West Midlands
Track / Motorsport PrepWest Midlands Region Member
 
willsy's Avatar
 
Join Date: Nov 2005
Location: Nuneaton (West Mids)
Posts: 13,835
Blog Entries: 4
Car(s): '64 Volvo V40 R’Design, '89 Ph1 309 GTi, ‘97 Mk1 S
iTrader Score: 125 (100%)
willsy is absolutely fabulous!willsy is absolutely fabulous!willsy is absolutely fabulous!willsy is absolutely fabulous!willsy is absolutely fabulous!willsy is absolutely fabulous!willsy is absolutely fabulous!willsy is absolutely fabulous!willsy is absolutely fabulous!willsy is absolutely fabulous!willsy is absolutely fabulous!
Default

Pointless exercise. The XU engines are an old design, they are not a tidy setup either with a mountain on hoses within the cooling system and the oil vapour. Power is no better than the 1.6 Saxo engines then there's the extra pain in the arse of the dizzy setup & fine tuning the timing whereas the TU engines offer more consistency
willsy is offline   Reply With Quote
The Following User Says Thank You to willsy For This Useful Post:
Old 30th March 2015, 09:26   #6
KamRacing
Saxperience Addict
Track / Motorsport Prep
 
KamRacing's Avatar
 
Join Date: Nov 2006
Location: A farm shed in Aylesbury
Posts: 14,916
Car(s): Corolla AE86 Peugeot 205 B18C (in bits)
iTrader Score: 16 (100%)
KamRacing is absolutely fabulous!KamRacing is absolutely fabulous!KamRacing is absolutely fabulous!KamRacing is absolutely fabulous!KamRacing is absolutely fabulous!KamRacing is absolutely fabulous!KamRacing is absolutely fabulous!KamRacing is absolutely fabulous!KamRacing is absolutely fabulous!KamRacing is absolutely fabulous!KamRacing is absolutely fabulous!
Default

Like Willsy says. Lots of work for no gain. TU 16v engine is on par performance wise with no hassle fitment. If you want to fit an engine similar then the Peugeot EW engines are very tunable but you wont have fun fitting it..
KamRacing is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 30th March 2015, 09:36   #7
Nimix
Regular Poster
 
Join Date: Jan 2015
Location: Naestved, Denmark
Posts: 281
Car(s): ex-Blue 106 Rallye 1.6 '97 Black 106 Gti '99
Nimix is on a distinguished road
Default

Google 106 2.0 Gti-6
Nimix is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 30th March 2015, 20:01   #8
prittvtr
Newbie
 
Join Date: Mar 2015
Location: Luton
Posts: 29
Car(s): too many
prittvtr is on a distinguished road
Default

compeltly forgot about this thread...

right now i dont understand half the stuff h lot have written here but i can clearly see that its pointless me getting it

but in terms of everything else....

i aint got a clue what half u lot on about with your 'TU 16V Engine' 'XU' how about you tell me what model it is or something... i aint used to these coded stuff or forum stuff

after help not help in confusin the sh""t outta me

thanks
prittvtr is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 30th March 2015, 20:31   #9
chinkostu
Saxperience Post Whore
North West Region Member
 
chinkostu's Avatar
 
Join Date: Aug 2008
Location: The wrong carpark
Posts: 5,152
Car(s): Xantia 1.9TD
iTrader Score: 2 (100%)
chinkostu is a jewel in the roughchinkostu is a jewel in the roughchinkostu is a jewel in the roughchinkostu is a jewel in the rough
Default

Quote:
Originally Posted by prittvtr View Post
compeltly forgot about this thread...

right now i dont understand half the stuff h lot have written here but i can clearly see that its pointless me getting it

but in terms of everything else....

i aint got a clue what half u lot on about with your 'TU 16V Engine' 'XU' how about you tell me what model it is or something... i aint used to these coded stuff or forum stuff

after help not help in confusin the sh""t outta me

thanks

TU and XU are the engine designations. Generally all the older cars run XU lumps as the TU was fairly new at the start of the 90's.

The 16v they're on about is the TU5j4 fitted to the VTS and 106 GTI. Not sure if they used them in the 306 and Xsaras, or any others for that matter.

The reason the XU derived lumps are harder to fit is because they're typically bigger and heavier and mount differently. Yes it has been done, but it isn't a cheap easy job

Last edited by chinkostu; 30th March 2015 at 20:36.
chinkostu is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 30th March 2015, 21:21   #10
welshpug
Saxperience Forum Bum
Track / Motorsport Prep
 
welshpug's Avatar
 
Join Date: Jul 2010
Location: South Wales
Posts: 3,076
Car(s): ZX 16v, 205 GTI, 309 Goodwood, 405 MI16.
iTrader Score: 1 (100%)
welshpug is on a distinguished road
Default

the XU is harder to fit as it sits at 30 degrees, not the essentially bolt upright of the TU, the exhaust is on the rear, inlet on the front.

the XU5 8v engine is actually a good chunk lighter than the TU5, probably an easy 20 kilos if not more, the iron block 2.0's are a different matter, though not significantly heavier than the TU5.

they do have the stronger BE gearboxes on them as standard which is a bonus.

the main issue is that the saxo/106 engine bay was never deigned for anything other than a TU engine, so space was cut down massively, the design brief for the 205 was to make a cheap hatchback for the masses using the XUD engine, just happened that the alloy petrol version sat at the same angle, and the space was more than enough for the TU that was used in later base model cars.
welshpug is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 31st March 2015, 08:33   #11
holdawayt
Saxperience Post Whore
Track / Motorsport PrepWest Midlands Region Member
 
holdawayt's Avatar
 
Join Date: Jan 2010
Location: Stourbridge
Posts: 7,338
Car(s): Nissan 200sx S14a
iTrader Score: 7 (100%)
holdawayt is on a distinguished road
Default

Quote:
Originally Posted by prittvtr View Post
compeltly forgot about this thread...

right now i dont understand half the stuff h lot have written here but i can clearly see that its pointless me getting it

but in terms of everything else....

i aint got a clue what half u lot on about with your 'TU 16V Engine' 'XU' how about you tell me what model it is or something... i aint used to these coded stuff or forum stuff

after help not help in confusin the sh""t outta me

thanks
Or you could try typing "TU 16v engine" into Google and finding out for yourself. Want us to buy and fit the engine for you too? God forbid you might even try using the search function at the top of the page.

It's not their fault that you're easily confused.
__________________
Nissan 200SX S14a
holdawayt is offline   Reply With Quote
The Following User Says Thank You to holdawayt For This Useful Post:
Old 31st March 2015, 12:12   #12
KamRacing
Saxperience Addict
Track / Motorsport Prep
 
KamRacing's Avatar
 
Join Date: Nov 2006
Location: A farm shed in Aylesbury
Posts: 14,916
Car(s): Corolla AE86 Peugeot 205 B18C (in bits)
iTrader Score: 16 (100%)
KamRacing is absolutely fabulous!KamRacing is absolutely fabulous!KamRacing is absolutely fabulous!KamRacing is absolutely fabulous!KamRacing is absolutely fabulous!KamRacing is absolutely fabulous!KamRacing is absolutely fabulous!KamRacing is absolutely fabulous!KamRacing is absolutely fabulous!KamRacing is absolutely fabulous!KamRacing is absolutely fabulous!
Default

Quote:
Originally Posted by chinkostu View Post
TU and XU are the engine designations. Generally all the older cars run XU lumps as the TU was fairly new at the start of the 90's.

The 16v they're on about is the TU5j4 fitted to the VTS and 106 GTI. Not sure if they used them in the 306 and Xsaras, or any others for that matter.

The reason the XU derived lumps are harder to fit is because they're typically bigger and heavier and mount differently. Yes it has been done, but it isn't a cheap easy job
TU 8v's have been kicking around in 205's from about 1983 , the 16v version was new though
KamRacing is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 31st March 2015, 13:36   #13
chinkostu
Saxperience Post Whore
North West Region Member
 
chinkostu's Avatar
 
Join Date: Aug 2008
Location: The wrong carpark
Posts: 5,152
Car(s): Xantia 1.9TD
iTrader Score: 2 (100%)
chinkostu is a jewel in the roughchinkostu is a jewel in the roughchinkostu is a jewel in the roughchinkostu is a jewel in the rough
Default

Quote:
Originally Posted by KamRacing View Post
TU 8v's have been kicking around in 205's from about 1983 , the 16v version was new though
Whoops, my bad.

Thought all the 205's were XU based!
chinkostu is offline   Reply With Quote
Reply

Bookmarks


Posting Rules
You may not post new threads
You may not post replies
You may not post attachments
You may not edit your posts

BB code is On
Smilies are On
[IMG] code is On
HTML code is Off

Forum Jump


All times are GMT. The time now is 09:06.