Saxo Engine/Performance If you're interested in tuning Saxo engines, or if you need to know something which is engine related... this is the place for you. |
 |
29th March 2015, 21:22
|
#1
|
Newbie
Join Date: Mar 2015
Location: Luton
Posts: 29
Car(s): too many
|
urgent! would this engine fit
thinking of something different with ma saxo as everyone seems to do the same old stuff with jus doing slight engine mods etc...
come across a peeeeejot 205 gti 1.6 complete engine
now one would this fit and two what do u recon
|
|
|
29th March 2015, 21:44
|
#2
|
Regular Poster
Join Date: Feb 2012
Location: Canvey Island
Posts: 381
Car(s): 2 16'v Saxo vtr's
|
Its not a straight fit. You can make it fit if you have the budget.
|
|
|
29th March 2015, 21:48
|
#3
|
Newbie
Join Date: Mar 2015
Location: Luton
Posts: 29
Car(s): too many
|
in your opinion what roughly would u say is the budget
|
|
|
29th March 2015, 22:51
|
#4
|
Regular Poster
Join Date: Feb 2012
Location: Canvey Island
Posts: 381
Car(s): 2 16'v Saxo vtr's
|
No idea to be honest. But surely after all the effort with fabricating mounts, loom work etc. (not very savvy with this stuff) you could get a JP4S engine that would be a much better base to go with over a older 205 engine.
|
|
|
29th March 2015, 23:01
|
#5
|
West Midlands
Join Date: Nov 2005
Location: Nuneaton (West Mids)
Posts: 13,835
Car(s): '64 Volvo V40 R’Design, '89 Ph1 309 GTi, ‘97 Mk1 S
|
Pointless exercise. The XU engines are an old design, they are not a tidy setup either with a mountain on hoses within the cooling system and the oil vapour. Power is no better than the 1.6 Saxo engines then there's the extra pain in the arse of the dizzy setup & fine tuning the timing whereas the TU engines offer more consistency
|
|
|
The Following User Says Thank You to willsy For This Useful Post:
|
|
30th March 2015, 09:26
|
#6
|
Saxperience Addict
Join Date: Nov 2006
Location: A farm shed in Aylesbury
Posts: 14,916
Car(s): Corolla AE86
Peugeot 205 B18C (in bits)
|
Like Willsy says. Lots of work for no gain. TU 16v engine is on par performance wise with no hassle fitment. If you want to fit an engine similar then the Peugeot EW engines are very tunable but you wont have fun fitting it..
|
|
|
30th March 2015, 09:36
|
#7
|
Regular Poster
Join Date: Jan 2015
Location: Naestved, Denmark
Posts: 281
Car(s): ex-Blue 106 Rallye 1.6 '97
Black 106 Gti '99
|
Google 106 2.0 Gti-6
|
|
|
30th March 2015, 20:01
|
#8
|
Newbie
Join Date: Mar 2015
Location: Luton
Posts: 29
Car(s): too many
|
compeltly forgot about this thread...
right now i dont understand half the stuff h lot have written here but i can clearly see that its pointless me getting it
but in terms of everything else....
i aint got a clue what half u lot on about with your 'TU 16V Engine' 'XU' how about you tell me what model it is or something... i aint used to these coded stuff or forum stuff
after help not help in confusin the sh""t outta me
thanks
|
|
|
30th March 2015, 20:31
|
#9
|
Saxperience Post Whore
Join Date: Aug 2008
Location: The wrong carpark
Posts: 5,152
Car(s): Xantia 1.9TD
|
Quote:
Originally Posted by prittvtr
compeltly forgot about this thread...
right now i dont understand half the stuff h lot have written here but i can clearly see that its pointless me getting it
but in terms of everything else....
i aint got a clue what half u lot on about with your 'TU 16V Engine' 'XU' how about you tell me what model it is or something... i aint used to these coded stuff or forum stuff
after help not help in confusin the sh""t outta me
thanks
|
TU and XU are the engine designations. Generally all the older cars run XU lumps as the TU was fairly new at the start of the 90's.
The 16v they're on about is the TU5j4 fitted to the VTS and 106 GTI. Not sure if they used them in the 306 and Xsaras, or any others for that matter.
The reason the XU derived lumps are harder to fit is because they're typically bigger and heavier and mount differently. Yes it has been done, but it isn't a cheap easy job
Last edited by chinkostu; 30th March 2015 at 20:36.
|
|
|
30th March 2015, 21:21
|
#10
|
Saxperience Forum Bum
Join Date: Jul 2010
Location: South Wales
Posts: 3,076
Car(s): ZX 16v, 205 GTI, 309 Goodwood, 405 MI16.
|
the XU is harder to fit as it sits at 30 degrees, not the essentially bolt upright of the TU, the exhaust is on the rear, inlet on the front.
the XU5 8v engine is actually a good chunk lighter than the TU5, probably an easy 20 kilos if not more, the iron block 2.0's are a different matter, though not significantly heavier than the TU5.
they do have the stronger BE gearboxes on them as standard which is a bonus.
the main issue is that the saxo/106 engine bay was never deigned for anything other than a TU engine, so space was cut down massively, the design brief for the 205 was to make a cheap hatchback for the masses using the XUD engine, just happened that the alloy petrol version sat at the same angle, and the space was more than enough for the TU that was used in later base model cars.
|
|
|
31st March 2015, 08:33
|
#11
|
Saxperience Post Whore
Join Date: Jan 2010
Location: Stourbridge
Posts: 7,338
Car(s): Nissan 200sx S14a
|
Quote:
Originally Posted by prittvtr
compeltly forgot about this thread...
right now i dont understand half the stuff h lot have written here but i can clearly see that its pointless me getting it
but in terms of everything else....
i aint got a clue what half u lot on about with your 'TU 16V Engine' 'XU' how about you tell me what model it is or something... i aint used to these coded stuff or forum stuff
after help not help in confusin the sh""t outta me
thanks
|
Or you could try typing "TU 16v engine" into Google and finding out for yourself. Want us to buy and fit the engine for you too? God forbid you might even try using the search function at the top of the page.
It's not their fault that you're easily confused.
|
|
|
The Following User Says Thank You to holdawayt For This Useful Post:
|
|
31st March 2015, 12:12
|
#12
|
Saxperience Addict
Join Date: Nov 2006
Location: A farm shed in Aylesbury
Posts: 14,916
Car(s): Corolla AE86
Peugeot 205 B18C (in bits)
|
Quote:
Originally Posted by chinkostu
TU and XU are the engine designations. Generally all the older cars run XU lumps as the TU was fairly new at the start of the 90's.
The 16v they're on about is the TU5j4 fitted to the VTS and 106 GTI. Not sure if they used them in the 306 and Xsaras, or any others for that matter.
The reason the XU derived lumps are harder to fit is because they're typically bigger and heavier and mount differently. Yes it has been done, but it isn't a cheap easy job
|
TU 8v's have been kicking around in 205's from about 1983  , the 16v version was new though
|
|
|
31st March 2015, 13:36
|
#13
|
Saxperience Post Whore
Join Date: Aug 2008
Location: The wrong carpark
Posts: 5,152
Car(s): Xantia 1.9TD
|
Quote:
Originally Posted by KamRacing
TU 8v's have been kicking around in 205's from about 1983  , the 16v version was new though
|
Whoops, my bad.
Thought all the 205's were XU based!
|
|
|
Posting Rules
|
You may not post new threads
You may not post replies
You may not post attachments
You may not edit your posts
HTML code is Off
|
|
|
All times are GMT. The time now is 09:06.
|