Saxo Problems & Queries If you're having problems with your Saxo and you're after a bit of advice, check this forum out... |
 |
20th November 2009, 18:43
|
#1
|
Newbie
Join Date: Mar 2009
Posts: 5
|
Another MOT Failure (Emissions)
I’m starting to hate my VTS ...
MOT today failed today due to CO emissions being 9.2 (0.30 max) CAT was changed only a few months ago, front lamber changed today as it was suspected faulty, however failed for a 2nd time.
Could the Lamber after the CAT also cause the high CO reading? The garage tell me not it would just be the front one.
Any ideas or advise would be good as i don’t want to spend hundreds on them fault finding.
Ads
|
|
|
20th November 2009, 18:58
|
#2
|
Newbie
Join Date: Mar 2009
Posts: 5
|
Forgot to add, she has a few small mods.
Raceland forced air induction
Full CAT back jan speed exhaust
Did have a jan speed mani , however this was a 2" bore and was blowing as cat inlet was only 1.75". CAT was changed for a 2" bore but was still blowing so i replaced this with the standard a few months after. CAT was also replaced at this time.
Thanks all,
Ads
|
|
|
20th November 2009, 19:01
|
#3
|
Newbie
Join Date: Nov 2009
Location: chelmsford
Posts: 3
Car(s): toyota paseo galliano
|
just go to a garage an ask if any mot tester is up for doin a dodgy mot an pay him a little extra on the side.. save spendin loads on tryin sort the problem out
|
|
|
20th November 2009, 19:01
|
#4
|
Saxperience Post Whore
Join Date: May 2009
Location: ringwood
Posts: 6,305
Car(s): suzuki swift 1.2 sz3
|
some of the gases might be getting through due to the change in sizes? or have i read it wrong
|
|
|
20th November 2009, 19:02
|
#5
|
Saxperience Forum Bum
Join Date: May 2007
Location: peterborough
Posts: 2,861
Car(s): 2003 black vtr current
escort van lol
2006 ford
|
i find at work 9/10 times it the rear lambda sensor at fault the last 3 saxo ones iver done have been rear sometime front on other but allways rear sensor on saxo
|
|
|
21st November 2009, 10:36
|
#6
|
Newbie
Join Date: Mar 2009
Posts: 5
|
Thanks for all your replys.
I have been doing some research and think it could be the following:
1) Bad rear lamber sensor
2) leaking manifold gaskit
would 2 result in a CO reading that high?
And is a CO reading that high common?
Ads
|
|
|
21st November 2009, 11:50
|
#7
|
Infrequent Poster
Join Date: Jul 2009
Location: Plymouth
Posts: 196
Car(s): Saxo VTR
|
If the mot tester is any good he should get it through really if you've changed everything you can. Mine went in yesterday for MOT, we spend 40 mins on the emissions to get it through. Failed first time as it didnt seem that the cat was working at all, but after a few changes with the revs, running the long test etc it came down to below max. Quite often it can fail on a cold engine, different revs etc. I'm still going to change my cat anyway cause it isn't performing as it should.
|
|
|
21st November 2009, 12:08
|
#8
|
Saxperience Post Whore
Join Date: Aug 2009
Location: ilkeston derbyshire
Posts: 9,823
Car(s): C2 VTR stripped, 406hdi, clio 172
|
why should an mot tester pass it just because everything has been changed? if its out of limits, its out of limits. could always try forte cat treatment, its worked many times for us in the past.
|
|
|
21st November 2009, 12:37
|
#9
|
Newbie
Join Date: Mar 2009
Posts: 5
|
Well, I think I'm going to have to start from the top.
Full service, stock air filter , stock exhaust , rear lamber , manifold gaskit then CAT again..
It passed last year so it must have been my pissing around with the exhaust. That's why I'm hoping it's nothing mayjor. People have said above 4.0 is bad however mines between 7 & 9.
The garage I use don't do MOT testing, so that just adds to the problem. Might take it somewhere else.
Ads
|
|
|
22nd November 2009, 09:34
|
#10
|
Established Member
Join Date: Nov 2007
Location: Hereford
Posts: 1,090
Car(s): S2 Rallye ITB.
Seat Leon FR.
Clio 182FF.
XSi 16v
|
A complete standard exhaust system and catalyic convertor will help alot mate, get them red hot before the MOT.
From your emmision being 9.2, thats very high considering you have no cams etc..
|
|
|
22nd November 2009, 09:43
|
#11
|
Saxperience Forum Bum
Join Date: Oct 2007
Location: East Grinstead - West Sussex
Posts: 3,094
Car(s): BMW E46 M3
|
replace the 2nd sensor, add some redex and take it for a good blast before the next mot
__________________
Quote:
Originally Posted by jamiemackie
ahhhhh......... central south, the only region where you need to put the rmo's balls in your mouth before you can join!
|
|
|
|
22nd November 2009, 10:12
|
#12
|
Saxperience Forum Bum
Join Date: May 2007
Location: peterborough
Posts: 2,861
Car(s): 2003 black vtr current
escort van lol
2006 ford
|
would worry changing exhaust etc as aboth change rear labda give it a good run before going making sure its hot and im sure it be fine
|
|
|
22nd November 2009, 10:39
|
#13
|
Saxperience Post Whore
Join Date: Apr 2007
Posts: 6,640
Car(s): Integra DC5R & VTS
|
The second lambda (after CAT) doesn't alter the fueling in any way - merely checks the CAT is working to an efficient level.
I would dismantle the throttle body and clean it along with its sensors. Also give the MAP sensor a clean - that's bolted to the left side of the inlet manifold. Give it a full service (with a clean air filter!) then give it a hoofing before the retest. Would be very surprised if you still have trouble then.
|
|
|
24th November 2009, 19:36
|
#14
|
Newbie
Join Date: Mar 2009
Posts: 5
|
Hi lee,
Well after quote alot of messing around we have found the CAT is not getting up to temp, Manifold is running at around 190 while the CAT is just 60 -100. The cat on the car is one of £100 jobbies. Garage want a OEM CAT to test so we can prove to the guys that provided the "as good as" CAT its there fault.. Anyone know where i can get a OEM CAT to test in East Sussex ??
I know that above might not make sense but im in a rush
|
|
|
Posting Rules
|
You may not post new threads
You may not post replies
You may not post attachments
You may not edit your posts
HTML code is Off
|
|
|
All times are GMT. The time now is 14:29.
|