Digital Photography Discussion A place to discuss digital photography, swap tips, tricks and pics! |
 |
|
8th November 2005, 14:19
|
#21
|
Saxperience Forum Bum
Join Date: Dec 2002
Location: Zoelen Netherlands
Posts: 2,949
Car(s): Saxo,C4
|
Quote:
Originally Posted by Simo
Regarding stamping the camera settings onto the photo, thats a great idea! Do you manually type the settings in, or is there a tool to drag this information from the picture settings and use it?
|
Click here for the plugin!
__________________
Fred --> My photosite!
Areke's husband
Caged Saxo | Leon turbooo --> replaced by C4 VTR+ | Canon EOS 20D + too many lenses
|
|
|
8th November 2005, 19:19
|
#22
|
Administrator
Join Date: Dec 2002
Location: Warrington
Posts: 20,554
Car(s): Blue Saxo VTS Turbo/White Megane F1 R26
|
Been looking through the brochures again
Im REALLY liking the Canon 60mm and 100mm macro lens, with USM. But they are expensive!
The Sigma macro gets great reviews, except for it being noisy when focussing and issues with it hunting and taking too long sometimes to step back to focus point.
But, maybe the Sigma is the sensible option to see if macro is what im into.
I hate these sensible moments  It's much more fun just going and buying stuff
|
|
|
8th November 2005, 19:57
|
#23
|
Saxperience Forum Bum
Join Date: Dec 2002
Location: Zoelen Netherlands
Posts: 2,949
Car(s): Saxo,C4
|
I've been thinking about this aswell...
Canon 100mm lens: best lens but (too) expensive.
Canon 60mm: wouldn't get that as it's not 1:1, only 60mm and it's an ef-s lens (which means it'll not fit the future full frame DSLR's).
Sigma: sensible option. Great pics and not too expensive. Downside: only 50mm, so you have to get quite close to the subject, which could scare insects
Tamron: Great lens, 90mm, 1:1, etc. Everything you want but more expensive than the Sigma.
So the Tamron is better than the Sigma, but also more expensive. If you're prepared to spend that, then I would get the Tamron. If not (and I can immagine that), then get the Sigma. Both Canons are too expensive for what they offer IMO.
__________________
Fred --> My photosite!
Areke's husband
Caged Saxo | Leon turbooo --> replaced by C4 VTR+ | Canon EOS 20D + too many lenses
|
|
|
8th November 2005, 20:49
|
#24
|
Administrator
Join Date: Dec 2002
Location: Warrington
Posts: 20,554
Car(s): Blue Saxo VTS Turbo/White Megane F1 R26
|
Quote:
Originally Posted by Frevo
BTW I you mainly do insects, 50 or 60mm might be a bit close. In that case the Tamron AF SP 90/2.8 or the Canon EF 100/2.8 MAKRO USM are a better choice. Both 1:1 btw.
|
The Tamron is listed in this Jessops brochure as £369.99  The SP AF 90mm F/2.8 Di Macro 1:1.
|
|
|
8th November 2005, 21:24
|
#25
|
Saxperience Forum Bum
Join Date: Dec 2002
Location: Zoelen Netherlands
Posts: 2,949
Car(s): Saxo,C4
|
You need to find a different shop!
The Tamron is € 388,- over here.. what is that, ~ 270 pounds?
The sigma is € 259,- over here btw.
__________________
Fred --> My photosite!
Areke's husband
Caged Saxo | Leon turbooo --> replaced by C4 VTR+ | Canon EOS 20D + too many lenses
|
|
|
8th November 2005, 21:29
|
#26
|
Saxperience Forum Bum
Join Date: Dec 2002
Location: Zoelen Netherlands
Posts: 2,949
Car(s): Saxo,C4
|
This is quite an interesting read BTW.
Also look what it says way down: "I got my Tamron for £259 from a UK retailer almost a year ago. Since then, prices have come down another £10 - £20)"
__________________
Fred --> My photosite!
Areke's husband
Caged Saxo | Leon turbooo --> replaced by C4 VTR+ | Canon EOS 20D + too many lenses
|
|
|
8th November 2005, 23:17
|
#27
|
Frequent Poster
Join Date: Dec 2002
Location: warrington United Kingdom (England)
Posts: 909
Car(s): white 197 renault sport clio cup
|
boys and their toys! glad to see your both having so much fun!! hehe
__________________
Suie xx
|
|
|
9th November 2005, 01:24
|
#28
|
Central South
Join Date: Feb 2005
Location: Haywards Heath
Posts: 9,844
Car(s): Fiesta STripes
|
Something I always do when taking landscape pictures is underexpose them by 1 stop - especially on a sunny day as the dark blue sky stands out better (I severely hope you got a polarising filter dude!)
Mike
__________________
Peugeot 106 | Fiat Punto | Saxo VTS | Zetec S | Clio 197 | Clio 182 | Saxo VTR 1| Fiesta ST | Saxo VTR 2| Saxo VTR 3| Mk 6 Fiesta ST | Mk 7 Fiesta ST3 1 | Mk 7 Fiesta ST3 2 | Mk 8 Fiesta ST PE with a Mk 6 Fiesta ST500 and a Mk 6 Fiesta ST150 "Nemo, Bessie and Stripes" Insta: @nemo_mk8_st
|
|
|
9th November 2005, 02:04
|
#29
|
Administrator
Join Date: Dec 2002
Location: Warrington
Posts: 20,554
Car(s): Blue Saxo VTS Turbo/White Megane F1 R26
|
Quote:
Originally Posted by Frevo
Quote:
Originally Posted by Simo
Regarding stamping the camera settings onto the photo, thats a great idea! Do you manually type the settings in, or is there a tool to drag this information from the picture settings and use it?
|
Click here for the plugin!
|
I could be having a blonde moment... but how the hell do you set this up or install it?
Is it a photoshop plugin? If so, where do I load it up in photoshop?
|
|
|
9th November 2005, 02:21
|
#30
|
Administrator
Join Date: Dec 2002
Location: Warrington
Posts: 20,554
Car(s): Blue Saxo VTS Turbo/White Megane F1 R26
|
Quote:
Originally Posted by mikecracknell81
Something I always do when taking landscape pictures is underexpose them by 1 stop - especially on a sunny day as the dark blue sky stands out better (I severely hope you got a polarising filter dude!)
Mike
|
Not got a polarising filter yet Mike... I just picked up a UV for protection and a +4 for budget closeup work
Was talking about polarising filters at lunchtime though
|
|
|
9th November 2005, 12:47
|
#31
|
Saxperience Forum Bum
Join Date: Dec 2002
Location: Zoelen Netherlands
Posts: 2,949
Car(s): Saxo,C4
|
Quote:
Originally Posted by Suie
boys and their toys! glad to see your both having so much fun!! hehe
|
Hehehe and such a peacefull hobby aswell
__________________
Fred --> My photosite!
Areke's husband
Caged Saxo | Leon turbooo --> replaced by C4 VTR+ | Canon EOS 20D + too many lenses
|
|
|
9th November 2005, 12:49
|
#32
|
Saxperience Forum Bum
Join Date: Dec 2002
Location: Zoelen Netherlands
Posts: 2,949
Car(s): Saxo,C4
|
Quote:
Originally Posted by mikecracknell81
Something I always do when taking landscape pictures is underexpose them by 1 stop - especially on a sunny day as the dark blue sky stands out better (I severely hope you got a polarising filter dude!)
Mike
|
Or just shoot in RAW
__________________
Fred --> My photosite!
Areke's husband
Caged Saxo | Leon turbooo --> replaced by C4 VTR+ | Canon EOS 20D + too many lenses
|
|
|
9th November 2005, 13:04
|
#33
|
Saxperience Forum Bum
Join Date: Dec 2002
Location: Zoelen Netherlands
Posts: 2,949
Car(s): Saxo,C4
|
Quote:
Originally Posted by Simo
Quote:
Originally Posted by Frevo
Quote:
Originally Posted by Simo
Regarding stamping the camera settings onto the photo, thats a great idea! Do you manually type the settings in, or is there a tool to drag this information from the picture settings and use it?
|
Click here for the plugin!
|
I could be having a blonde moment... but how the hell do you set this up or install it?
Is it a photoshop plugin? If so, where do I load it up in photoshop?
|
You thick bastard
It's a java script. You have to put it in the PS folder where the other scripts are (do a search for *.jsx files). Then execute: file->scripts. You can alter the ini file to display "©", etc.
Alternatively you can try this programm: click!
I prefer this actually, but the page is in Dutch, though I think you can choose English in the programm. Just give it a go!
__________________
Fred --> My photosite!
Areke's husband
Caged Saxo | Leon turbooo --> replaced by C4 VTR+ | Canon EOS 20D + too many lenses
|
|
|
9th November 2005, 13:36
|
#34
|
Administrator
Join Date: Dec 2002
Location: Warrington
Posts: 20,554
Car(s): Blue Saxo VTS Turbo/White Megane F1 R26
|
Found it now... I am still using PS7, which doesnt have the scripts function
I installed CS months ago too, but have not yet switched to using it... I see the scripts option now.
Thanks
|
|
|
9th November 2005, 14:09
|
#35
|
Saxperience Forum Bum
Join Date: Dec 2002
Location: Zoelen Netherlands
Posts: 2,949
Car(s): Saxo,C4
|
You need CS2 anyway
PS is very usefull in digital photography.
Digital camera's tend to take unsharp pics (that's because of the way they're constructed). Digital compact camera's modify pics in camera so you only have to upload them to your computer and you're done. With DSLR's you have to do that yourself. Ad unsharp mask, play with levels, colours, saturation, etc. It's all part of the fun!
btw it's not possible to make a bad pic good, or an unsharp pic sharp.. but it is to make a good pic better.
And it's not cheating ether.. Back in the days of analogue pics, people used darkrooms.. think of PS as a digital darkroom.
__________________
Fred --> My photosite!
Areke's husband
Caged Saxo | Leon turbooo --> replaced by C4 VTR+ | Canon EOS 20D + too many lenses
|
|
|
9th November 2005, 14:36
|
#36
|
Administrator
Join Date: Dec 2002
Location: Warrington
Posts: 20,554
Car(s): Blue Saxo VTS Turbo/White Megane F1 R26
|
I shall have to look if my photoshop is CS or CS2
I've been resisting changing due to all of the actions I have setup in PS7 for sax-p. No doubt they wont all convert across properly... I know they didnt when moving from PS4
|
|
|
9th November 2005, 14:40
|
#37
|
Saxperience Forum Bum
Join Date: Dec 2002
Location: Zoelen Netherlands
Posts: 2,949
Car(s): Saxo,C4
|
Just try it... make a copy of the actions and put then in the CS2 actions folder. Then try if they work.
CS is better as it also supports RAW files.
__________________
Fred --> My photosite!
Areke's husband
Caged Saxo | Leon turbooo --> replaced by C4 VTR+ | Canon EOS 20D + too many lenses
|
|
|
Posting Rules
|
You may not post new threads
You may not post replies
You may not post attachments
You may not edit your posts
HTML code is Off
|
|
|
All times are GMT. The time now is 07:14.
|