| Digital Photography Discussion A place to discuss digital photography, swap tips, tricks and pics! |
 |
|
25th June 2007, 09:03
|
#21
|
|
Saxperience Hardcore!
Join Date: Dec 2003
Location: Middlesbrough United Kingdom (England)
Posts: 23,676
Car(s): Seat Leon FR
|
Great pics Si!
__________________
Old Skool Sax-p
|
|
|
|
25th June 2007, 10:40
|
#22
|
|
Super Moderator
Join Date: Feb 2004
Location: Tonbridge United Kingdom (England)
Posts: 38,236
Car(s): Vtr, 172, throttle bodied track slut
|
Quote:
Originally Posted by adsayer
I guess for me most of the shots on my 10D i do are 'pissed mates shots' so I dont really want photos that appear to have come off mobile... smooth skin tones and all that.
|
so no constructive pics then ad 
point and shoots are for pissed mates, try doing some harder stuff and you will see why you cant be so retentive over 100 iso all the time
__________________
God made beer, women and Throttle bodies 
|
|
|
|
|
25th June 2007, 11:11
|
#23
|
|
Saxperience Hardcore!
Join Date: Oct 2005
Location: Aycliffe
Posts: 32,205
Car(s): Saxo VTS
|
Quote:
Originally Posted by Itsafastworld85
so no constructive pics then ad
point and shoots are for pissed mates, try doing some harder stuff and you will see why you cant be so retentive over 100 iso all the time |
First try all @ISO 100 
|
|
|
|
|
25th June 2007, 11:18
|
#24
|
|
Saxperience Addict
Join Date: Jan 2007
Location: Benfleet, Essex
Posts: 10,834
Car(s): Megane 225 Cup
|
Very, very good pictures, the Porsches looked very good. The 8th picture down is my favourite, when they are coming down the hill. Looked a very good day.
|
|
|
|
|
25th June 2007, 11:45
|
#25
|
|
Frequent Poster
Join Date: Dec 2002
Location: Hertfordshire
Posts: 569
Car(s): Pug 306 GTi-6
|
Quote:
Originally Posted by Simo
ISO - I think its just Ads who has the issue 
Weather sealed... Ive got the 70-200 f/2.8 - Im pretty sure I read that it was 'waterproof' |
Haha! I for some reason thought you had a 100-400! 
Ant has, not you.
LOL
And yes, Ads has ISO issues.
__________________
My Images | Canon EOS 20D x2| Sigma 70-200f2.8 EX HSM|Sigma 120-300f2.8EX HSM
|
|
|
|
|
25th June 2007, 12:16
|
#26
|
|
Regular Poster
Join Date: Jan 2007
Location: Northwich
Posts: 350
Car(s): VTR
|
nice pics, i really wanted to go as well. my mate lives just out side the gates and gets free passes lol.
|
|
|
|
|
25th June 2007, 12:46
|
#27
|
|
Saxperience Hardcore!
Join Date: Jul 2006
Location: Somewhere nicer than you
Posts: 32,356
Car(s): S2 Exige 240S, CLS63 AMG, Freelander
|
Quote:
Originally Posted by adsayer
I guess for me most of the shots on my 10D i do are 'pissed mates shots' so I dont really want photos that appear to have come off mobile... smooth skin tones and all that.
|
aye, i totally agree with you
but i till dont understand why people complain about the noise form the camera. lol aye, my samsung isnt the quietest camera around.. but i couldnt care less. lol it still takes great pics!
__________________
Quote:
Originally Posted by jw1325
Together Forever, on a saxo forum, without saxos <3
|
Quote:
Originally Posted by JamesR
Ok Viper, you are 100% correct concerning everything, sorry to have interrupted your discussion, please continue.
|
Quote:
Originally Posted by Rod1
Beastiallity... They're always blowing seals. Ba-dum-tssh!
|
|
|
|
|
|
25th June 2007, 14:25
|
#28
|
|
Frequent Poster
Join Date: Dec 2002
Location: Hertfordshire
Posts: 569
Car(s): Pug 306 GTi-6
|
Quote:
Originally Posted by Viper
but i till dont understand why people complain about the noise form the camera. lol aye, my samsung isnt the quietest camera around.. but i couldnt care less. lol it still takes great pics!
|
You do know that we're talking about "noisy" images - ie images that look grainy - not the actual sound that the camera makes when in use.
__________________
My Images | Canon EOS 20D x2| Sigma 70-200f2.8 EX HSM|Sigma 120-300f2.8EX HSM
|
|
|
|
|
25th June 2007, 15:26
|
#29
|
|
Saxperience Hardcore!
Join Date: Jul 2006
Location: Somewhere nicer than you
Posts: 32,356
Car(s): S2 Exige 240S, CLS63 AMG, Freelander
|
__________________
Quote:
Originally Posted by jw1325
Together Forever, on a saxo forum, without saxos <3
|
Quote:
Originally Posted by JamesR
Ok Viper, you are 100% correct concerning everything, sorry to have interrupted your discussion, please continue.
|
Quote:
Originally Posted by Rod1
Beastiallity... They're always blowing seals. Ba-dum-tssh!
|
|
|
|
|
|
25th June 2007, 15:30
|
#30
|
|
Saxperience Hardcore!
Join Date: Feb 2005
Posts: 29,674
|
*snigger* are you taking the piss??? lmao
|
|
|
|
|
25th June 2007, 15:36
|
#31
|
|
Frequent Poster
Join Date: Dec 2002
Location: Hertfordshire
Posts: 569
Car(s): Pug 306 GTi-6
|
I'd never do that
__________________
My Images | Canon EOS 20D x2| Sigma 70-200f2.8 EX HSM|Sigma 120-300f2.8EX HSM
|
|
|
|
|
25th June 2007, 15:36
|
#32
|
|
Saxperience Hardcore!
Join Date: Jul 2006
Location: Somewhere nicer than you
Posts: 32,356
Car(s): S2 Exige 240S, CLS63 AMG, Freelander
|
who, me??
no
__________________
Quote:
Originally Posted by jw1325
Together Forever, on a saxo forum, without saxos <3
|
Quote:
Originally Posted by JamesR
Ok Viper, you are 100% correct concerning everything, sorry to have interrupted your discussion, please continue.
|
Quote:
Originally Posted by Rod1
Beastiallity... They're always blowing seals. Ba-dum-tssh!
|
|
|
|
|
|
25th June 2007, 17:17
|
#33
|
|
Super Moderator
Join Date: Feb 2004
Location: Tonbridge United Kingdom (England)
Posts: 38,236
Car(s): Vtr, 172, throttle bodied track slut
|
Quote:
Originally Posted by DaveG
You do know that we're talking about "noisy" images - ie images that look grainy - not the actual sound that the camera makes when in use.
|
i thought aswell he was thinking noise was the shuter sound LOL!
ROLFTASTIC!
Ads sorry mate but the pics from yorg drage way do nothing for me.
__________________
God made beer, women and Throttle bodies
|
|
|
|
|
25th June 2007, 18:54
|
#34
|
|
Saxperience Hardcore!
Join Date: Oct 2005
Location: Aycliffe
Posts: 32,205
Car(s): Saxo VTS
|
Quote:
Originally Posted by Itsafastworld85
Ads sorry mate but the pics from yorg drage way do nothing for me.
|
give me a chance muddy funkster. I was using a canon 28-80, didnt have a clue what i was doing (no change), (except to stay away from those dirty high ISO's  ) and it was my first time. I sure with a few hours practice i can bosh out some better shots.
anyway they were shown in your reply to your comment about 'being retentive about high Iso's innit'... did I need high ISO? nope.
|
|
|
|
|
25th June 2007, 19:03
|
#35
|
|
Super Moderator
Join Date: Feb 2004
Location: Tonbridge United Kingdom (England)
Posts: 38,236
Car(s): Vtr, 172, throttle bodied track slut
|
Quote:
Originally Posted by adsayer
anyway they were shown in your reply to your comment about 'being retentive about high Iso's innit'... did I need high ISO? nope.
|
are all your shots the same? yes. Is the light really poor? no?
when you do different stuff and in different light you NEED to use different iso settings, otherwise you will have a slow shutter speed and blurred to fuck images lol
__________________
God made beer, women and Throttle bodies
|
|
|
|
|
25th June 2007, 20:48
|
#36
|
|
Frequent Poster
Join Date: Dec 2002
Location: Hertfordshire
Posts: 569
Car(s): Pug 306 GTi-6
|
ISO 800
A 10D will never come close to a 20D/30D at that sort of ISO so I can understand your concern but there's not point in not using the camera if you aren't going to go outside ISO200.
__________________
My Images | Canon EOS 20D x2| Sigma 70-200f2.8 EX HSM|Sigma 120-300f2.8EX HSM
|
|
|
|
|
25th June 2007, 22:10
|
#37
|
|
Saxperience Hardcore!
Join Date: Oct 2005
Location: Aycliffe
Posts: 32,205
Car(s): Saxo VTS
|
Quote:
Originally Posted by Itsafastworld85
are all your shots the same? yes.
|
no... different cars and at points... like i said first time. i was practicing... more concerned with getting it right rather than trying to impress you
sorry im laughing my head off in real life here
Quote:
Originally Posted by DaveG
ISO 800
A 10D will never come close to a 20D/30D at that sort of ISO so I can understand your concern
|
just goes to show the progress between the 20 and the 10.... how much post processing was done on that dave? I could always grab one of those photoshop add-ins that reduces the noise maybe.
just to show I'm not totally anti-high-iso...
1600ISO
Quote:
Originally Posted by DaveG
but there's not point in not using the camera if you aren't going to go outside ISO200.
|
'no point in NOT using the camera'?
or
'no point in using the camera'?
disagree completely...the camera produces lush photos at low ISO far better than my compact.
|
|
|
|
|
26th June 2007, 09:54
|
#38
|
|
Frequent Poster
Join Date: Dec 2002
Location: Hertfordshire
Posts: 569
Car(s): Pug 306 GTi-6
|
The only PP that was done on that was resizing and small adjustments to levels, plus a low level pass of Unsharp Mask. I don't use Noise Ninja either.
Small typo, I meant "no point in using the camera if you aren't going to go outside ISO200" as you have seemed so hell bent on not doing so previously.
Yours will produce good results at ISO400 and acceptable results at ISO800, if you nail the exposure noise levels are reduced.
I have a feeling you're arguing with Ryan just for the sake of it.
__________________
My Images | Canon EOS 20D x2| Sigma 70-200f2.8 EX HSM|Sigma 120-300f2.8EX HSM
|
|
|
|
|
26th June 2007, 10:25
|
#39
|
|
Saxperience Hardcore!
Join Date: Oct 2005
Location: Aycliffe
Posts: 32,205
Car(s): Saxo VTS
|
Quote:
Originally Posted by DaveG
The only PP that was done on that was resizing and small adjustments to levels, plus a low level pass of Unsharp Mask. I don't use Noise Ninja either.
|
Dave I'd be interest too see a direct comparison between level adjusted and low level pass of unsharp mask... if thats ok? wondering whether its something i should adopt for my pics. What i post up it what comes straight off zee camera.
Quote:
Originally Posted by DaveG
Yours will produce good results at ISO400 and acceptable results at ISO800, if you nail the exposure noise levels are reduced.
|
I disagree with what I've seen from mine in the past, but I'll stick the camera on a tripod and take the same photo and we can compare. when you say nail the exposure... presumably a longer exposure?
Quote:
Originally Posted by DaveG
I have a feeling you're arguing with Ryan just for the sake of it.
|
Hardly arguing for the sake of it... but I am enjoying the discussion/debate
See below
Quote:
Originally Posted by Itsafastworld85
so no constructive pics then ad try doing some harder stuff and you will see why you cant be so retentive over 100 iso all the time |
Fair enough.... so I post...
Quote:
Originally Posted by adsayer
|
then..
Quote:
Originally Posted by Itsafastworld85
Ads sorry mate but the pics from yorg drage way do nothing for me.
|
whats that got to do with ISO speed?!?!?!?! fair enough they may be shite images but where I thought we were discussing ISO speed.
Quote:
Originally Posted by adsayer
anyway they were shown in your reply to your comment about 'being retentive about high Iso's innit'... did I need high ISO? nope.
|
Quote:
Originally Posted by Itsafastworld85
are all your shots the same?
|
again nowt to do with the ISO...
|
|
|
|
|
26th June 2007, 10:34
|
#40
|
|
Saxperience Hardcore!
Join Date: Feb 2003
Location: Parkwood, Kent United Kingdom (England)
Posts: 23,641
Car(s): Megane Coupe/Convertible Diesel
|
Great pics Simo... 
Chris 
|
|
|
|
Posting Rules
|
You may not post new threads
You may not post replies
You may not post attachments
You may not edit your posts
HTML code is Off
|
|
|
All times are GMT. The time now is 22:04.
|
Linear Mode
