Digital Photography Discussion A place to discuss digital photography, swap tips, tricks and pics! |
|
|
13th May 2007, 17:48
|
#21
|
Administrator
Join Date: Dec 2002
Location: Warrington
Posts: 20,551
Car(s): Blue Saxo VTS Turbo/White Megane F1 R26
|
Quote:
Originally Posted by DaveG
I've already said it's ok for the money. All the others are a whole chunk more cash.
Simo - if you want focal length and only shoot in really good light then it's fine, wait until you shoot a rally in a rainy dark forest! the 100-400 needs good light or you find yourself at the limit of your ISO range. why don't you want to mess with converters??
Ad - Canon 100-400 vs 50-500 is a good one, but the Canon is better.
|
Fair comment Dave.. F4 is not the best.
I was considering a 200mm with x2 teleconverter but at the time I looked autofocus was not possible with the conevrter.
I recall Canon bring out a 200mm F2.8 which could be used properly with a x2 converter, but the combined price was more than the 400. Better F and more flexible I guess though...
I know your a fan of Sigma (or rather a hater of the Canon stigma) but Ive honestly never looked at Sigma equivalents.
|
|
|
13th May 2007, 17:55
|
#22
|
Frequent Poster
Join Date: Dec 2002
Location: Hertfordshire
Posts: 569
Car(s): Pug 306 GTi-6
|
Ad - look at Sigma's website, that explains all about Apochromatic glass etc.
Si - prime lenses are good but fast ones are expensive and as you say not flexible.
__________________
My Images | Canon EOS 20D x2| Sigma 70-200f2.8 EX HSM|Sigma 120-300f2.8EX HSM
|
|
|
13th May 2007, 17:55
|
#23
|
Frequent Poster
Join Date: Dec 2002
Location: Hertfordshire
Posts: 569
Car(s): Pug 306 GTi-6
|
oh and it's a larger f stop rather than a 'better' one
__________________
My Images | Canon EOS 20D x2| Sigma 70-200f2.8 EX HSM|Sigma 120-300f2.8EX HSM
|
|
|
13th May 2007, 17:57
|
#24
|
Saxperience Hardcore!
Join Date: Oct 2005
Location: Aycliffe
Posts: 32,205
Car(s): Saxo VTS
|
Quote:
Originally Posted by DaveG
Si - prime lenses are good but fast ones are expensive and as you say not flexible.
|
i know its not tele but i did buy a 50mm F1.8 bloody hell all i want is primes now... contrast is fantastic... bit too long for portraity(ish) people work but cracking nevertheless.
cheers dave having a gander now...
edit: ahhh makes sense now... refractive indexes of differing wavelengths of light. That would affect a DSLR in the same way as a 35mm surely?
Last edited by Barry123; 13th May 2007 at 18:00.
|
|
|
13th May 2007, 17:59
|
#25
|
Administrator
Join Date: Dec 2002
Location: Warrington
Posts: 20,551
Car(s): Blue Saxo VTS Turbo/White Megane F1 R26
|
Quote:
Originally Posted by DaveG
oh and it's a larger f stop rather than a 'better' one
|
picky, picky
|
|
|
13th May 2007, 18:03
|
#26
|
Frequent Poster
Join Date: Dec 2002
Location: Hertfordshire
Posts: 569
Car(s): Pug 306 GTi-6
|
not being picky at all, trying to help you understand it.
ads - I guess so. I bought a 50mm 1.8 and used it once haha
__________________
My Images | Canon EOS 20D x2| Sigma 70-200f2.8 EX HSM|Sigma 120-300f2.8EX HSM
|
|
|
13th May 2007, 18:06
|
#27
|
Saxperience Hardcore!
Join Date: Oct 2005
Location: Aycliffe
Posts: 32,205
Car(s): Saxo VTS
|
yeah i know what you mean... its a tad limited. I tend to use my camera for taking pictures of me and my pissed house mates so its getting used a fair bit. Its kind of made me realise how soft the 17-35 is
|
|
|
13th May 2007, 18:21
|
#28
|
Frequent Poster
Join Date: Dec 2002
Location: Hertfordshire
Posts: 569
Car(s): Pug 306 GTi-6
|
just don't subject the 50mm to any heavy use, it'll break.
again a good lens for the £ but not very sharp wide open
__________________
My Images | Canon EOS 20D x2| Sigma 70-200f2.8 EX HSM|Sigma 120-300f2.8EX HSM
|
|
|
13th May 2007, 18:25
|
#29
|
Saxperience Hardcore!
Join Date: Oct 2005
Location: Aycliffe
Posts: 32,205
Car(s): Saxo VTS
|
yeah read the 39048348 warnings by users about the build quality and the focus mechanism... honestly I was expecting it to be louder than a concert judging by some of the comments. havent used the lens on F1.8 yet... seems bloody good at F4 but ive never tried the prosumer lenses as a comparison.
|
|
|
13th May 2007, 18:37
|
#30
|
Frequent Poster
Join Date: Dec 2002
Location: Hertfordshire
Posts: 569
Car(s): Pug 306 GTi-6
|
the only problem I found with the AF on mine was it was very inaccurate and hunted a fair bit
__________________
My Images | Canon EOS 20D x2| Sigma 70-200f2.8 EX HSM|Sigma 120-300f2.8EX HSM
|
|
|
13th May 2007, 18:44
|
#31
|
Saxperience Hardcore!
Join Date: Oct 2005
Location: Aycliffe
Posts: 32,205
Car(s): Saxo VTS
|
havent really seen a problem with that tbh...
which one do you have MKI or MKII? F1.8 ya?
|
|
|
13th May 2007, 18:59
|
#32
|
Frequent Poster
Join Date: Dec 2002
Location: Hertfordshire
Posts: 569
Car(s): Pug 306 GTi-6
|
Quote:
Originally Posted by DaveG
I bought a 50mm 1.8 and used it once haha
|
Was a MkII, sold it for more than I paid for it
__________________
My Images | Canon EOS 20D x2| Sigma 70-200f2.8 EX HSM|Sigma 120-300f2.8EX HSM
|
|
|
16th May 2007, 19:21
|
#33
|
Saxperience Hardcore!
Join Date: Oct 2005
Location: Aycliffe
Posts: 32,205
Car(s): Saxo VTS
|
update... well it was sent monday... arrived yesterday, but i picked it up today.
boom. no addtional charges
grand total £96.99
one very happy adsayer
|
|
|
18th May 2007, 14:09
|
#34
|
Frequent Poster
Join Date: Dec 2002
Location: Hertfordshire
Posts: 569
Car(s): Pug 306 GTi-6
|
Result, now get some pics with it
__________________
My Images | Canon EOS 20D x2| Sigma 70-200f2.8 EX HSM|Sigma 120-300f2.8EX HSM
|
|
|
18th May 2007, 18:13
|
#35
|
Saxperience Hardcore!
Join Date: Oct 2005
Location: Aycliffe
Posts: 32,205
Car(s): Saxo VTS
|
Quote:
Originally Posted by DaveG
Result, now get some pics with it
|
uber slackness on my part I havent even used it yet
|
|
|
21st May 2007, 18:16
|
#36
|
Frequent Poster
Join Date: Dec 2002
Location: Hertfordshire
Posts: 569
Car(s): Pug 306 GTi-6
|
Lame
__________________
My Images | Canon EOS 20D x2| Sigma 70-200f2.8 EX HSM|Sigma 120-300f2.8EX HSM
|
|
|
21st May 2007, 18:30
|
#37
|
Administrator
Join Date: Dec 2002
Location: Warrington
Posts: 20,551
Car(s): Blue Saxo VTS Turbo/White Megane F1 R26
|
Thanks for the kick Dave.
I decided against the older 100-400 and opted for a 70-200 IS 2.8 with a x2 converter. A better quality lens with more flexibility I guess.
If the 70-200 is f2.8 through the focal length, with the x2 converter on, that will make it f4 static wont it?
|
|
|
21st May 2007, 18:36
|
#38
|
Super Moderator
Join Date: Feb 2004
Location: Tonbridge United Kingdom (England)
Posts: 38,236
Car(s): Vtr, 172, throttle bodied track slut
|
Quote:
Originally Posted by Simo
Thanks for the kick Dave.
I decided against the older 100-400 and opted for a 70-200 IS 2.8 with a x2 converter. A better quality lens with more flexibility I guess.
If the 70-200 is f2.8 through the focal length, with the x2 converter on, that will make it f4 static wont it?
|
exactly the set up i intend on going for there.
__________________
God made beer, women and Throttle bodies
|
|
|
21st May 2007, 18:40
|
#39
|
Administrator
Join Date: Dec 2002
Location: Warrington
Posts: 20,551
Car(s): Blue Saxo VTS Turbo/White Megane F1 R26
|
Quote:
Originally Posted by Itsafastworld85
exactly the set up i intend on going for there.
|
Wanna go halves?.... you can use it mon-fri, I'll use it at the weekends
|
|
|
21st May 2007, 18:50
|
#40
|
Super Moderator
Join Date: Feb 2004
Location: Tonbridge United Kingdom (England)
Posts: 38,236
Car(s): Vtr, 172, throttle bodied track slut
|
Quote:
Originally Posted by Simo
Wanna go halves?.... you can use it mon-fri, I'll use it at the weekends
|
haha!!! not cheap is it! its come down in price by about £250 in the last few months though from what ive seen.
__________________
God made beer, women and Throttle bodies
|
|
|
Posting Rules
|
You may not post new threads
You may not post replies
You may not post attachments
You may not edit your posts
HTML code is Off
|
|
|
All times are GMT. The time now is 15:36.
|