Saxo Brakes / Suspension / Transmission / Tyres If you have queries or information to share regarding Saxo braking, suspension, tyres or transmission systems, please discuss this within this forum. |
View Poll Results: Which gearbox?
|
VTS box on 60K
|
  
|
10 |
24.39% |
VTS box from breakers
|
  
|
3 |
7.32% |
XSi rebuilt box
|
  
|
28 |
68.29% |
 |
22nd April 2009, 18:33
|
#1
|
Established Member
Join Date: Feb 2009
Location: Hertford/Derby
Posts: 1,272
Car(s): MG BGT, AX Gti
|
Which gearbox would you get?
My gearbox is broken on my VTS so I need to replace it, after seeing what was available iv basically got 3 options:
VTS box, done 60K, no crutch's or whines - £75
VTS box from a breakers/scrappies, 180+ days warrenty - £170+
XSi box, rebuilt with new syncro's, bearings etc, cleaned etc but no warrenty - £150
Which would you go for, yesterday I was swaying more towards the cheapo £75 box because if it broke id only be £75 down...today im thinking more of the XSi box as it has been mostly rebuilt so shouldnt have any problems and is going to be faster accelerating. Iv havent really liked the idea of the breakers as I imagine if it broke id have to take it all off myself, send it etc which seems like a lot of hassle.
|
|
|
22nd April 2009, 18:37
|
#2
|
Super Moderator
Join Date: Feb 2004
Location: Tonbridge United Kingdom (England)
Posts: 38,236
Car(s): Vtr, 172, throttle bodied track slut
|
depends on what you want from the car.
Most will say xsi without even asking if you are worried about loosing mpg
__________________
God made beer, women and Throttle bodies
|
|
|
22nd April 2009, 18:38
|
#3
|
Forum Section Moderator
Join Date: Aug 2008
Location: Liverpool
Posts: 15,517
Car(s): Saxo VTR
|
I would go with the XSI mate, wouldnt mind one myself actually...
|
|
|
22nd April 2009, 18:39
|
#4
|
Established Member
Join Date: Feb 2009
Location: Hertford/Derby
Posts: 1,272
Car(s): MG BGT, AX Gti
|
Quote:
Originally Posted by Ryan
depends on what you want from the car.
Most will say xsi without even asking if you are worried about loosing mpg
|
Ideally id like a fast car, but still very usable on the road as the most it will probably do is spirited driving on B-roads. I didn't think the XSi box would make a huge difference to MPG, hence why its better then an S1 rallye box in certain aspects.
|
|
|
22nd April 2009, 18:43
|
#5
|
Super Moderator
Join Date: Feb 2004
Location: Tonbridge United Kingdom (England)
Posts: 38,236
Car(s): Vtr, 172, throttle bodied track slut
|
Quote:
Originally Posted by Hpi_matrix
Ideally id like a fast car, but still very usable on the road as the most it will probably do is spirited driving on B-roads. I didn't think the XSi box would make a huge difference to MPG, hence why its better then an S1 rallye box in certain aspects.
|
The final drive is massively different to the vts final drive so MPG will be notably effected.
My opinion is though a gearbox for £100-200 can improve performance alot more than a £100-200 airfilter.
__________________
God made beer, women and Throttle bodies
|
|
|
22nd April 2009, 18:47
|
#6
|
Established Member
Join Date: Feb 2009
Location: Hertford/Derby
Posts: 1,272
Car(s): MG BGT, AX Gti
|
Quote:
Originally Posted by Ryan
The final drive is massively different to the vts final drive so MPG will be notably effected.
My opinion is though a gearbox for £100-200 can improve performance alot more than a £100-200 airfilter.
|
Read all the air filter stuff mate, sticking with the standard airbox
Do you know roughly what MPG I should expect, on a long run say?
Last edited by Hpi_matrix; 22nd April 2009 at 18:49.
|
|
|
22nd April 2009, 19:04
|
#7
|
Established Member
Join Date: Sep 2008
Location: Torbay
Posts: 1,565
Car(s): 2000 phase 2 Saxo VTS Turbo 2000 Nissan 200sx S14a
|
unless you use your car on track all the time, i wouldn't get an xsi box. the vts box is a good box across the board really, decent acceleration and a decent top end.
|
|
|
22nd April 2009, 19:04
|
#8
|
Saxperience Post Whore
Join Date: Mar 2007
Location: Yorkshire
Posts: 5,415
Car(s): Saxo
|
iirc at 70mph your at 4.2k~ rpm with the xsi, so if you intend to cam it then you'll be able to watch your petrol steadily dribble away like theres a hole in the tank.
__________________
Note to self; everyone else knows what there doing.
|
|
|
22nd April 2009, 19:28
|
#9
|
Established Member
Join Date: Feb 2009
Location: Hertford/Derby
Posts: 1,272
Car(s): MG BGT, AX Gti
|
!
Tbh though I would say I mostly do town driving so will it majorly affect MPG then? I guess on motorways I could stick to 60, used to it having the MG...way to noisy at 70 and the wipers threaten to blow away!
Engine mods I have planned on the VTS are only a decent mani and exhaust system and maybe piggyback ecu and remap in the very distant future.
Last edited by Hpi_matrix; 22nd April 2009 at 19:30.
|
|
|
25th April 2009, 12:35
|
#10
|
Saxperience Forum Bum
Join Date: Jun 2007
Location: Newcastle Upon Tyne
Posts: 3,017
Car(s): Honda DC5, Gruppe M and j's racing
|
Ive recently had a rebuilt xsi box fitted to my cammed 's' and mpg has went up !! potentially cos of round the doors im in a higher gear at a lower spee. Either way to a tank im now getting over 300 miles to the usual 260-280 on the 's' box.
__________________
This the clio that did the kessel run in less than 12 parsecs
quick to the point, to the point no fakin', cookin mc's like a lb of bacon!!!
|
|
|
25th April 2009, 12:53
|
#11
|
Established Member
Join Date: Aug 2006
Location: Bristol
Posts: 2,015
Car(s): MK2 VTS
|
i voted vts
xsi will be anoying at like 5k rpm doing 80 on the motorway
i cant see how the above post can be correct, more rpm, more petrol used by and large
__________________
Quote:
Originally Posted by JimoVTR
when they finish pissing and shitting, then they can sit on my face
|
Quote:
Originally Posted by Jaytee
This just escalated to a whole new level of perversion. I like it.
|
|
|
|
25th April 2009, 13:06
|
#12
|
Saxperience Post Whore
Join Date: Sep 2006
Location: Tyldesley, Manchester
Posts: 5,276
Car(s): 1.Saxo VTR 2.Saxo180
|
Quote:
Originally Posted by ricksimmonds
i voted vts
xsi will be anoying at like 5k rpm doing 80 on the motorway
i cant see how the above post can be correct, more rpm, more petrol used by and large
|
Not neccesarily. A lot of the big german cars will do less mpg at 90 than they will at 70 in the same gear so i heard.
__________________
Iv Been tangoed.
Quote:
Originally Posted by JimoVTR
the smell of rape was lingering a bit to long then?
|
|
|
|
25th April 2009, 14:07
|
#13
|
Established Member
Join Date: Jun 2008
Location: nuneaton
Posts: 1,796
Car(s): LY R26
|
i havnt found an xsi box affect my mpg that much, i worked it out on that site and i got 37.6mpg and i used about 40litres just over i think it was, but its not far of what i got with vtr box on, and that was from driving round town and round the lanes giving it a bit of beans here and there, so a mix of driving.
but you will be higher up the revs doing less speed, i think on my vtr doing 50mph it sits at 5800rpm just under i think, and doing 60 its around 3200-3300rpm, if i remember rightly
but im sure adsayer said that on a vtr mk1 peak power is at 3k rpm so driving there will give you best mpg, so you could do 60 at just over 3k and still get good mpg, cause thats the speed i drive round lanes and motorway etc, but i think your speeds at rpm will vary to mine as yours is vts and revs slightly higher, but i dont htink it will be that much diff to vtr is it?
but getting the xsi box will make a big difference on acceleration, i think its the best upgrade ive done to my vtr, so i vote that
Last edited by vtr_chris90; 25th April 2009 at 14:10.
|
|
|
28th April 2009, 19:01
|
#14
|
Established Member
Join Date: Feb 2009
Location: Hertford/Derby
Posts: 1,272
Car(s): MG BGT, AX Gti
|
Going for the XSi box
1. Its faster (always important ha)
2. Its rebuilt, so in theory should last unlike an unknown box
3. Being an XSi box will make it easy to sell on if I want to go back to a VTS box .
Worth getting uprated gear linkages with the box? Or a set of new OEM ones?
|
|
|
28th April 2009, 23:00
|
#15
|
Established Member
Join Date: Jun 2008
Location: nuneaton
Posts: 1,796
Car(s): LY R26
|
good to hear your going with xsi box, you will be impressed by it and it should make a good difference
i think its def worth looking at uprated gear linkages, plus it will be best time to change them really, cause you have to remove the linkages to change boxes anyway so sort of makes sense, i wish i had changed mine to uprated ones, but really couldnt afford it at the time, i was pushing it with fitting the xsi box lol
|
|
|
24th June 2009, 16:31
|
#16
|
Established Member
Join Date: Jul 2008
Location: Taunton, Somerset
Posts: 1,182
Car(s): Millenium Falcon
|
The Engine is most efficient while it's at it's peak torque figure (see Adsayers post on saving fuel for more info)
This means on most of the boxes you should be between 3000 and 3500 rpm for best mpg.
Still though, It will be annoying as anything to be at such high revs, trust me I know from experience of driving a 1.1 which has ridiculously high rpm on the motorway etc.
You can't really go wrong with the VTS box for all round performance and everyday driving.
|
|
|
24th June 2009, 20:28
|
#17
|
Frequent Poster
Join Date: Dec 2006
Location: London, England
Posts: 734
Car(s): Saxo VTS, Audi A6 Avant Quattro.
|
Depends on if the xsi has been rebuilt properly
|
|
|
2nd July 2009, 10:50
|
#18
|
Established Member
Join Date: Feb 2009
Location: Hertford/Derby
Posts: 1,272
Car(s): MG BGT, AX Gti
|
Quote:
Originally Posted by bytor
Depends on if the xsi has been rebuilt properly
|
Obviously, unfortunately it wasn't. Seems hard enough to get any kind of sports cluster box near me! All iv managed to get is a VTS g/box with a dodgy 2nd syncro which will do for now.
I might just settle for anybox for a week or 2 while I try and make one good box from my 2 dodgy ones!
|
|
|
Posting Rules
|
You may not post new threads
You may not post replies
You may not post attachments
You may not edit your posts
HTML code is Off
|
|
|
All times are GMT. The time now is 18:03.
|