Mobile Devices: Lite Theme Citroën: Citroën Trader | Saxo Trader | C2 Trader Peugeot: Peugeot Trader | 106 Trader Enthusiast: Saxperience


Go Back   Saxperience - Citroen Saxo Forum > General Forums > General Chat...
Register Member Photo AlbumsBlogs FAQ Calendar Experience

General Chat... This forum is for general chit-chat, banter, exchange of information, etc. Pretty much everything goes... within reason!

Reply
 
Thread Tools Display Modes
Old 20th January 2009, 23:46   #1
BrownBoy3z
L-plater
 
Join Date: Feb 2008
Location: Cov
Posts: 54
BrownBoy3z can only hope to improve
Default Saxo Vs Golf

I am going to get a car soon, but i am not sure whether to get a mk4 1.4 Golf or a 1.4 west coast Saxo.
I would like to know which car is faster, i believe that the Saxo is lighter so it would start off quicker but will the golf catch up eventually?

It is not only the speed that bothers me, but also that the Saxo's interior is not very nice compared to the golfs.

Could any one on here help me choose between the Saxo or the Golf. Thanks
BrownBoy3z is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 20th January 2009, 23:48   #2
saxokid100
Saxperience Addict
North Wales Region MemberNorth West Region Member
 
saxokid100's Avatar
 
Join Date: Jun 2006
Location: Wirral
Posts: 13,584
Car(s): Wickerd red VTS MK2, Two tone VTS MK2,vvc Metro..
iTrader Score: 1 (100%)
saxokid100 is a jewel in the roughsaxokid100 is a jewel in the roughsaxokid100 is a jewel in the rough
Talking

Quote:
Originally Posted by BrownBoy3z View Post
I am going to get a car soon, but i am not sure whether to get a mk4 1.4 Golf or a 1.4 west coast Saxo.
I would like to know which car is faster, i believe that the Saxo is lighter so it would start off quicker but will the golf catch up eventually?

It is not only the speed that bothers me, but also that the Saxo's interior is not very nice compared to the golfs.

Could any one on here help me choose between the Saxo or the Golf. Thanks
Well ide say saxo!! but then the only saxo ide have would be mk2 vts....... 16v power.................
saxokid100 is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 20th January 2009, 23:49   #3
rossj
Established Member
South East Region Member
 
rossj's Avatar
 
Join Date: Dec 2007
Location: Chelmsford, Essex
Posts: 1,043
Car(s): Saxo VTR 2001
iTrader Score: 1 (100%)
rossj has a spectacular aura aboutrossj has a spectacular aura aboutrossj has a spectacular aura about
Default

Money you will pay for a 1.4 golf surly you could get a furio or VTR?

But yea acceleration saxo would be quicker after about 60 golf would probs catch up.
__________________

My Progress
My E-Garage
rossj is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 20th January 2009, 23:54   #4
CHIP
Saxperience Post Whore
 
CHIP's Avatar
 
Join Date: Apr 2007
Location: Mansfield
Posts: 6,663
Blog Entries: 3
Car(s): Astra Coupe Edition 100
iTrader Score: 12 (100%)
CHIP is an unknown quantity at this point
Default

Depends what your after. The Sax would be quicker and more fun to drive. But the Golf would be a cosier place to be. Also, i believe you'd be paying more for the Golf as the Mk4's hold money well.

They're two different types of cars tbf, so you cant really compare them.
__________________
CHIP is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 21st January 2009, 00:04   #5
Tony
Saxperience Forum Bum
South East Region Member
 
Tony's Avatar
 
Join Date: Mar 2003
Location: Kent
Posts: 3,994
Tony has much to be proud ofTony has much to be proud ofTony has much to be proud ofTony has much to be proud ofTony has much to be proud ofTony has much to be proud ofTony has much to be proud ofTony has much to be proud of
Default

I cannot imagine the Golf being faster than the Saxo but I'd have the Golf over the Saxo anytime at my age. But this sounds like its for your first car and you'd probably have more fun in the Saxo and it'd be cheaper to run. I can imagine a 1.4 Golf feeling really underpowered.

You made me laugh with 'i believe that the Saxo is lighter so it would start off quicker but will the golf catch up eventually?' , its like you're getting ready for your 'trafik lite rinses bruv'. It would be like comparing a Slug and Snail and asking if the Snail would catch the Slug eventually, neither car will break any speed records.

In summary, Id go for the Golf.
__________________
Quote:
Originally Posted by L20VTS
If that's a genuine member i'll take it up the arse!
Tony is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 21st January 2009, 00:16   #6
PSPDan
Saxperience Post Whore
South West Region Member
 
Join Date: Sep 2008
Posts: 5,204
iTrader Score: 7 (100%)
PSPDan is on a distinguished road
Default

Depends what you're after. Personally I'd say anything less than a 1.6 Golf will feel very underpowered and seriously underwhelming to drive. The saxo will be nippy and they are very fun cars to drive. Tbh this is an impossible comparison to make because they are cars that you would want for completely different reasons. Safety, comfort, practicality? Golf. Fun, err... fun, fun? Saxo.
PSPDan is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 21st January 2009, 01:06   #7
Robn1987
L-plater
 
Join Date: Oct 2008
Location: Ipswich Suffolk
Posts: 36
Car(s): 1999 Citroen Saxo VTS 1999 VW Golf GTI 2002 Hond
Robn1987 is on a distinguished road
Default

CITROEN SAXO SPECIAL EDITIONS 1.4i West Coast 3dr

Technical Data ummary
Body Style Hatchback
Engine Size 1360 cc
Fuel Type Petrol
Number of Doors 3
Number of Seats 5
Gearbox Type MANUAL
co2 Emissions 164 g/km
Insurance Group 5


Technical Data erformance & Economy
Fuel Consumption (Urban) 29.7 mpg
Fuel Consumption (ExtraUrban) 52.3 mpg
Fuel Consumption (Combined) 40.9 mpg
0-62mph 11.2 seconds
Top Speed 109 mph
Cylinders 4
Number of Valves 8 V
Engine Power 75 bhp
Engine Torque 82 lbs/ft


VOLKSWAGEN GOLF HATCHBACK 1.4 S 5dr

Technical Data ummary
Body Style Hatchback
Engine Size 1390 cc
Fuel Type Petrol
Number of Doors 5
Number of Seats 5
Gearbox Type MANUAL
co2 Emissions 163 g/km
Insurance Group 4

Technical Data erformance & Economy
Fuel Consumption (Urban) 31 mpg
Fuel Consumption (ExtraUrban) 51.4 mpg
Fuel Consumption (Combined) 41.5 mpg
0-62mph 14 seconds
Top Speed 106 mph
Cylinders 4
Number of Valves 16 V
Engine Power 75 bhp
Engine Torque 93 lbs/ft

Hope this helps i have a Golf MK4 GTi and as mentioned above its alot comfier but the saxo vts i also own is more fun to drive, hence Saxo = Track Day Car / Golf = Daily Driving
Robn1987 is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 21st January 2009, 01:32   #8
Day_hughes
Infrequent Poster
 
Day_hughes's Avatar
 
Join Date: Oct 2008
Location: Southport
Posts: 145
Day_hughes is on a distinguished road
Default

a mate round mine has a Golf 1.4S, sits sweet on his 17/18 alloys and looks the part. i myself would just decide on opinion really.. golf the more practical choice an the saxo with the attitude.
Day_hughes is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 21st January 2009, 10:41   #9
bpm
Established Member
Central South Region MemberEast Anglia Region Member
 
bpm's Avatar
 
Join Date: Dec 2008
Location: Hemel Hempstead
Posts: 1,013
Car(s): Citroen Saxo 16v 1.6 VTS '99 (Pearlescent Blue/Red
bpm is on a distinguished road
Default

Totally different cars. With the golf youre paying for a higher level of refinment and safety but the car is going to cost a lot more. The saxo is cheaper, faster, lighter and more fun.

Depends what you want it for, saxo is fun and easily modified, even repairs are cheaper. If you just want a daily driver for work the golfs heavier and more comfortable.
__________________
IF is a two letter word for futility
bpm is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 21st January 2009, 10:46   #10
Dan
Saxperience Hardcore!
North East Region Member
 
Dan's Avatar
 
Join Date: Dec 2003
Location: Middlesbrough United Kingdom (England)
Posts: 23,676
Car(s): Seat Leon FR
iTrader Score: 1 (100%)
Dan is absolutely fabulous!Dan is absolutely fabulous!Dan is absolutely fabulous!Dan is absolutely fabulous!Dan is absolutely fabulous!Dan is absolutely fabulous!Dan is absolutely fabulous!Dan is absolutely fabulous!Dan is absolutely fabulous!Dan is absolutely fabulous!Dan is absolutely fabulous!
Default

I would go for the golf if its your first car as it is far safer than the saxo but will probably be a little more expensive to run with it being heavy.

I had a 1.4 golf for a week a few years back, very comfy cars and lovely to drive but not very nippy.
__________________
Old Skool Sax-p
Dan is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 21st January 2009, 10:58   #11
Ste-88
Saxperience Forum Bum
North East Region Member
 
Ste-88's Avatar
 
Join Date: Jul 2008
Location: Darlington
Posts: 3,534
Car(s): GTiT
iTrader Score: 2 (100%)
Ste-88 is as cool as a cucumber!Ste-88 is as cool as a cucumber!Ste-88 is as cool as a cucumber!Ste-88 is as cool as a cucumber!Ste-88 is as cool as a cucumber!Ste-88 is as cool as a cucumber!Ste-88 is as cool as a cucumber!Ste-88 is as cool as a cucumber!Ste-88 is as cool as a cucumber!Ste-88 is as cool as a cucumber!Ste-88 is as cool as a cucumber!
Default

Golf all day long.

Hold their price, easy to make look nice, isn't french crap.
__________________
☻/
/▌ Liar Liar Pants on Fire, You're not Gangsta, You're not Street
/ \
Ste-88 is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 21st January 2009, 11:32   #12
betty02
Saxperience Post Whore
North West Region Member
 
betty02's Avatar
 
Join Date: May 2007
Location: Blackpool
Posts: 7,123
Blog Entries: 2
Car(s): MK5 Golf GTi FSi
iTrader Score: 10 (100%)
betty02 is absolutely fabulous!betty02 is absolutely fabulous!betty02 is absolutely fabulous!betty02 is absolutely fabulous!betty02 is absolutely fabulous!betty02 is absolutely fabulous!betty02 is absolutely fabulous!betty02 is absolutely fabulous!betty02 is absolutely fabulous!betty02 is absolutely fabulous!betty02 is absolutely fabulous!
Default

have the golf any day
betty02 is offline   Reply With Quote
Reply

Bookmarks


Posting Rules
You may not post new threads
You may not post replies
You may not post attachments
You may not edit your posts

BB code is On
Smilies are On
[IMG] code is On
HTML code is Off

Forum Jump


All times are GMT. The time now is 04:36.