Help with next car choice?

[Vtr_Cam]

Originally Posted by rick_VTR

better than french shit.

Your on a saxo forum

[rick_VTR]

Originally Posted by Vtr_Cam

Your on a saxo forum

i know, and i also drive a saxo

[Nik_L]

If i had £3k for a new car, i certainly wouldn't be looking at an MG ZR.

[rick_VTR]

Originally Posted by Nik_L

If i had £3k for a new car, i certainly wouldn't be looking at an MG ZR.

thats always good to know

[Tontsy]

Originally Posted by rick_VTR

not this shit again

Originally Posted by rick_VTR

better than french shit.

you certainly arnt clued up about cars...

please shh.

[Tontsy]

Originally Posted by rick_VTR

thats always good to know

its great to know, that some people actually have a tad bit of fucking sense when it comes to buying a car.

id rather give 3k to a fucking crack whore, then buy an MG ZR!

do you tuck your tracksuit bottoms into your socks?

[Ashleyp]

you say the accord typeR is rather old looking.

better up your budget if you want something newer...

[Rob-6]

Mg Zr?

[Tontsy]

Originally Posted by Ashleyp

you say the accord typeR is rather old looking.

better up your budget if you want something newer...

they look awesome !
or maybe an alteza... they look pretty spanky spanky!

[Tontsy]

Originally Posted by Rob-6

Mg Zr?

[rick_VTR]

what is so bad about a mg zr then?

and no i dont even own a pair of track suit bottoms.

[Ashleyp]

Originally Posted by tonto_VTR

they look awesome !
or maybe an alteza... they look pretty spanky spanky!

I don't mind them personally, although i couldnt see myself owning one.

4doors can GTF anyway. 2 doors or walk. lol

quick, new looking, low miles, 4 doors - all for £3k. the OP is deluded.

edit:

http://pistonheads.com/sales/3139375.htm

http://pistonheads.com/sales/2992827.htm (nasty colour, but you get the idea) - these can be had for around 3k

[Tontsy]

Originally Posted by rick_VTR

what is so bad about a mg zr then?

and no i dont even own a pair of track suit bottoms.

whats soo good about them?
slow, ugly, expensive, unreliable, common, waste of space . . .

seats feel like shit
interior is so dull and annoying, aswell as looking and feeling super cheap
it lacks, the ability to put a smile on someones face.
gear changes are horrid!
nothing about them is smooth, fluid, soft, ... anyhting you look for in a car.

even the sound of closing the door, sounds cheap and tacky.

[Nik_L]

http://www.pistonheads.co.uk/sales/3087318.htm

[Nik_L]

MG ZR is a car that can be had for around £1k.

Thats why i wouldn't be looking at them if i had £3k to spend.

[Tontsy]

as much as id hate to say it, but you could get a nice bimmer for that kind of money.

and you'd be silly not too.

[Ashleyp]

Early E46's look wank, but if you can get past that, you have a whole host of decent motors to chose from.

http://pistonheads.com/sales/3115526.htm

http://pistonheads.com/sales/2905613.htm

http://pistonheads.com/sales/3140563.htm

http://pistonheads.com/sales/3004406.htm

E39:

http://pistonheads.com/sales/3040714.htm

http://pistonheads.com/sales/3138444.htm

http://pistonheads.com/sales/3135057.htm

[rick_VTR]

Originally Posted by tonto_VTR

whats soo good about them?
slow, ugly, expensive, unreliable, common, waste of space . . .

seats feel like shit
interior is so dull and annoying, aswell as looking and feeling super cheap
it lacks, the ability to put a smile on someones face.
gear changes are horrid!
nothing about them is smooth, fluid, soft, ... anyhting you look for in a car.

even the sound of closing the door, sounds cheap and tacky.

bearing in mind were on a saxo forum, the 105 is roughly on par with a vtr, and the 120 is roughly on par with the vts.

there roughly the same price as the saxos.

there no more unreliable than a saxo infact there more reliable if there looked after.

there a much more solid car than a saxo

far better built than a saxo

engines are better than the french engines (aslong as uprated head gasket is fitted)

much more fun to drive than a saxo as you can actualy go round corners without wondering if your guna full off the road.

so they are better than a saxo in general.

[Ashleyp]

Originally Posted by rick_VTR

bearing in mind were on a saxo forum, the 105 is roughly on par with a vtr, and the 120 is roughly on par with the vts.

there roughly the same price as the saxos.

there no more unreliable than a saxo infact there more reliable if there looked after.

there a much more solid car than a saxo

far better built than a saxo

engines are better than the french engines (aslong as uprated head gasket is fitted)

much more fun to drive than a saxo as you can actualy go round corners without wondering if your guna full off the road.

so they are better than a saxo in general.

Either your saxos an absolute shitter, or you can't drive.

[LWS_71]

Originally Posted by rick_VTR

bearing in mind were on a saxo forum, the 105 is roughly on par with a vtr, and the 120 is roughly on par with the vts.

there roughly the same price as the saxos.

there no more unreliable than a saxo infact there more reliable if there looked after.

there a much more solid car than a saxo

far better built than a saxo

engines are better than the french engines (aslong as uprated head gasket is fitted)

much more fun to drive than a saxo as you can actualy go round corners without wondering if your guna full off the road.

so they are better than a saxo in general.

Have you even driven any of the cars you have mentioned?

An MG ZR will out handle a saxo?

mug . . .

EDIT: Ashley beat me too it. This kids deluded.