Saxo Engine/Performance If you're interested in tuning Saxo engines, or if you need to know something which is engine related... this is the place for you. |
 |
|
13th April 2009, 18:24
|
#1
|
Saxperience Forum Bum
Join Date: Mar 2009
Location: Dublin
Posts: 4,359
Car(s): Honda S2000
|
whats the diff between 8v ad 16v?which is better
jus wanna know what it is and what is better
ive a vtr mk2 i think its a 00
|
|
|
13th April 2009, 18:25
|
#2
|
Forum Section Moderator
Join Date: Aug 2008
Location: Liverpool
Posts: 15,517
Car(s): Saxo VTR
|
Your VTR will be a 8V with 90bhp.
16V is better.
|
|
|
13th April 2009, 18:26
|
#3
|
Saxperience Forum Bum
Join Date: Jun 2008
Posts: 3,932
|
welll...... 8 valves mate
|
|
|
13th April 2009, 18:27
|
#4
|
Saxperience Forum Bum
Join Date: Jun 2006
Location: Swansea
Posts: 4,946
Car(s): Bianca White Peugeot 106 S2 Rallye,
Saxo VTS
|
Quote:
Originally Posted by gouldy87
welll...... 8 valves mate
|
Lolz!
8 - 16 = .....
|
|
|
13th April 2009, 18:28
|
#5
|
Saxperience Post Whore
Join Date: Dec 2007
Location: Chesterfield
Posts: 5,469
Car(s): Ecoboost
|
Lol as Goudly said, the difference is 8 more valves. And of course the 16v will be faster if thats what you mean by being 'better'
|
|
|
13th April 2009, 18:30
|
#6
|
Super Moderator
Join Date: Feb 2004
Location: Tonbridge United Kingdom (England)
Posts: 38,236
Car(s): Vtr, 172, throttle bodied track slut
|
4 valves per cylinder or 2 valves.
what do you think is better????
__________________
God made beer, women and Throttle bodies
|
|
|
13th April 2009, 18:32
|
#7
|
Saxperience Post Whore
Join Date: Jul 2007
Location: Newcastle
Posts: 6,719
|
Quote:
Originally Posted by Ryan
4 valves per cylinder or 2 valves.
what do you think is better????
|
The VTR got more torque.
Does it fuck
|
|
|
13th April 2009, 18:35
|
#8
|
Saxperience Forum Bum
Join Date: Mar 2009
Location: Dublin
Posts: 4,359
Car(s): Honda S2000
|
thank you guys.
i feel stupid now
haha
|
|
|
13th April 2009, 18:36
|
#9
|
Forum Section Moderator
Join Date: Aug 2008
Location: Liverpool
Posts: 15,517
Car(s): Saxo VTR
|
Quote:
Originally Posted by Mieran
The VTR got more torque.
Does it fuck
|
I have heard this, does it? i dont think it will have.
Nice white writing
|
|
|
13th April 2009, 18:39
|
#10
|
Super Moderator
Join Date: Feb 2004
Location: Tonbridge United Kingdom (England)
Posts: 38,236
Car(s): Vtr, 172, throttle bodied track slut
|
Quote:
Originally Posted by SaXo_vtr123
I have heard this, does it? i dont think it will have.
|
It doesnt. usually retarded 8v owners say it does because they want a reason to justify why they dont have a 16v engine.
__________________
God made beer, women and Throttle bodies
|
|
|
13th April 2009, 18:40
|
#11
|
Forum Section Moderator
Join Date: Aug 2008
Location: Liverpool
Posts: 15,517
Car(s): Saxo VTR
|
Quote:
Originally Posted by Ryan
It doesnt. usually retarded 8v owners say it does because they want a reason to justify why they dont have a 16v engine.
|
Didnt think it would have lol
Where is the theory behind it?
|
|
|
13th April 2009, 18:43
|
#12
|
Regular Poster
Join Date: Dec 2008
Posts: 305
|
Quote:
Originally Posted by Mieran
The VTR got more torque.
Does it fuck
|
The 90 and 98bhp 1.6 8v saxos have 100 lb-ft torque, the 1.6 16v has 107 lb-ft. So not really
|
|
|
13th April 2009, 18:44
|
#13
|
Forum Section Moderator
Join Date: Aug 2008
Location: Liverpool
Posts: 15,517
Car(s): Saxo VTR
|
Quote:
Originally Posted by r_i_c_h_1
The 90 and 98bhp 1.6 8v saxos have 100 lb-ft torque, the 1.6 16v has 107 lb-ft. So not really 
|
Where you onto the white writing?  
|
|
|
13th April 2009, 18:50
|
#14
|
Regular Poster
Join Date: Dec 2008
Posts: 305
|
Quote:
Originally Posted by SaXo_vtr123
|
Typing with your eyes closed? Or am I reading with mine closed? Can't understand you?
|
|
|
13th April 2009, 18:55
|
#15
|
Forum Section Moderator
Join Date: Aug 2008
Location: Liverpool
Posts: 15,517
Car(s): Saxo VTR
|
Mieran wrote in white writing underneath his post, did you see it?
|
|
|
13th April 2009, 18:55
|
#16
|
Saxperience Forum Bum
Join Date: Oct 2004
Location: Spennymoor, United Kingdom (England)
Posts: 3,742
Car(s): Saxo MK2 VTS
|
16v is better, close, lock delete and all that jazz
__________________
"Tupps + Fossie, Mitchell Brothers... But Bigger......"
|
|
|
13th April 2009, 18:58
|
#17
|
Regular Poster
Join Date: Dec 2008
Posts: 305
|
Quote:
Originally Posted by SaXo_vtr123
Mieran wrote in white writing underneath his post, did you see it? 
|
To be honest I don't usually highlight the page looking for hidden msgs... but thanks for the tuumbs up
|
|
|
13th April 2009, 19:00
|
#18
|
Forum Section Moderator
Join Date: Aug 2008
Location: Liverpool
Posts: 15,517
Car(s): Saxo VTR
|
Quote:
Originally Posted by r_i_c_h_1
To be honest I don't usually highlight the page looking for hidden msgs... but thanks for the tuumbs up 
|
I dont highlight the page, its just when thers a space betwee someones post and there signature, you can tell.
Like this
|
|
|
13th April 2009, 19:04
|
#19
|
Regular Poster
Join Date: Dec 2008
Posts: 305
|
Quote:
Originally Posted by SaXo_vtr123
I dont highlight the page, its just when thers a space betwee someones post and there signature, you can tell.
Like this
|
I wasn't implying you did bud, lighten up
|
|
|
13th April 2009, 19:05
|
#20
|
Forum Section Moderator
Join Date: Aug 2008
Location: Liverpool
Posts: 15,517
Car(s): Saxo VTR
|
LOL am light
|
|
|
Posting Rules
|
You may not post new threads
You may not post replies
You may not post attachments
You may not edit your posts
HTML code is Off
|
|
|
All times are GMT. The time now is 13:43.
|