Saxo Engine/Performance If you're interested in tuning Saxo engines, or if you need to know something which is engine related... this is the place for you. |
 |
22nd July 2009, 14:10
|
#1
|
Infrequent Poster
Join Date: Jul 2009
Location: northumberland
Posts: 163
Car(s): saxo vts
impreza wrx
|
mk2 vtr and mk2 vts...
the power on the mk2 vtr was upped to 98bhp so why was the vts not upped ??
|
|
|
22nd July 2009, 14:11
|
#2
|
Saxperience Post Whore
Join Date: Apr 2005
Location: Teesside
Posts: 8,800
Car(s): focus tdci, clio v6
|
it was to do with emmissions the changes, vts just got an egr valve
|
|
|
22nd July 2009, 14:16
|
#3
|
Infrequent Poster
Join Date: Jul 2009
Location: northumberland
Posts: 163
Car(s): saxo vts
impreza wrx
|
cheers mate, i heard the mk1 vtr ahd a really restrictive exhaust on
|
|
|
22nd July 2009, 14:18
|
#4
|
Saxperience Post Whore
Join Date: Apr 2005
Location: Teesside
Posts: 8,800
Car(s): focus tdci, clio v6
|
im not sure tbh, i know the cat was moved from underneath to the manifold but i cant remember off the top of my head what changes they made to get this increase otherwise
someone will come up with the goods on here im sure
|
|
|
22nd July 2009, 14:22
|
#5
|
Saxperience Post Whore
Join Date: Jun 2007
Location: Darlington
Posts: 8,766
Car(s): Icelandic Grey Citroen Saxo VTS
|
I have read somewhere that the VTR engine has been restricted alot due to the performance being close the the VTS, thus meaning more poeple would buy the VTR to the VTS which Citreon didnt want to happen - hence the restrictions.
Not sure if the story totally true, but that what I read and cant remember for the life of me where I read it!
|
|
|
22nd July 2009, 14:27
|
#6
|
Saxperience Post Whore
Join Date: Apr 2005
Location: Teesside
Posts: 8,800
Car(s): focus tdci, clio v6
|
probably the same person who said vtr has more torque..................
|
|
|
22nd July 2009, 14:44
|
#7
|
Saxperience Post Whore
Join Date: Jun 2007
Location: Darlington
Posts: 8,766
Car(s): Icelandic Grey Citroen Saxo VTS
|
Quote:
Originally Posted by dsh85
probably the same person who said vtr has more torque..................
|
it does....
iJoke-
|
|
|
22nd July 2009, 14:55
|
#8
|
Saxperience Addict
Join Date: May 2009
Location: Somewhere in Bonnyland
Posts: 10,669
Car(s): Super clean mk5 Golf Gti and 306 hdi
|
Quote:
Originally Posted by Raz
it does....
iJoke-
|
since when?
lots of dafties try to say that a vtr will smoke a vts off the line but av had plenty of races wae vtr's and left everyone behind from the line
|
|
|
22nd July 2009, 14:55
|
#9
|
Saxperience Post Whore
Join Date: Jun 2007
Location: Darlington
Posts: 8,766
Car(s): Icelandic Grey Citroen Saxo VTS
|
Quote:
Originally Posted by D--R--E--W
since when?
lots of dafties try to say that a vtr will smoke a vts off the line but av had plenty of races wae vtr's and left everyone behind from the line
|
See white text
|
|
|
22nd July 2009, 15:00
|
#10
|
Saxperience Addict
Join Date: May 2009
Location: Somewhere in Bonnyland
Posts: 10,669
Car(s): Super clean mk5 Golf Gti and 306 hdi
|
av just checked torquestats.com and parkers.com and both say the 98bhp vtr has 100lbs torque and the vts 107 so........
|
|
|
22nd July 2009, 15:01
|
#11
|
Saxperience Addict
Join Date: May 2009
Location: Somewhere in Bonnyland
Posts: 10,669
Car(s): Super clean mk5 Golf Gti and 306 hdi
|
ok am a dick lol disregard that last message then lol
|
|
|
22nd July 2009, 15:05
|
#12
|
Saxperience Post Whore
Join Date: Jun 2007
Location: Darlington
Posts: 8,766
Car(s): Icelandic Grey Citroen Saxo VTS
|
Quote:
Originally Posted by D--R--E--W
ok am a dick lol disregard that last message then lol
|
LOL dont worry dude...I know the stats  was just joking on with Danny
|
|
|
22nd July 2009, 15:09
|
#13
|
Saxperience Post Whore
Join Date: Apr 2005
Location: Teesside
Posts: 8,800
Car(s): focus tdci, clio v6
|
vtr has more torque and can hit 60 in 2nd!
uh oh ive started a debate now lol,
dosent wikipedia or summit throw up the answer to the changes!
|
|
|
22nd July 2009, 15:10
|
#14
|
Saxperience Post Whore
Join Date: Jun 2007
Location: Darlington
Posts: 8,766
Car(s): Icelandic Grey Citroen Saxo VTS
|
Quote:
Originally Posted by dsh85
vtr has more torque and can hit 60 in 2nd!
uh oh ive started a debate now lol,
dosent wikipedia or summit throw up the answer to the changes!
|
mine hits 62mph before the limiter comes in...thats because I haz foglights on though...
|
|
|
22nd July 2009, 20:38
|
#15
|
Regular Poster
Join Date: Jun 2009
Location: Newcastle...
Posts: 431
Car(s): mk2 vtr
|
wasnt i telling you this the other night...
|
|
|
22nd July 2009, 23:31
|
#16
|
Infrequent Poster
Join Date: Jul 2009
Location: northumberland
Posts: 163
Car(s): saxo vts
impreza wrx
|
you were indeed richard... it got me thinking lol
|
|
|
22nd July 2009, 23:39
|
#17
|
Saxperience Forum Bum
Join Date: Dec 2008
Location: Gloucester
Posts: 3,000
Car(s): Citroen Saxo VTR
Renault 5
|
ive heard that the inlet manifolds were restricted somehow???
dont quote though lol
__________________
Quote:
Originally Posted by liam08
I can confirm that you are a girl. Ive seen the CLUNGE!!!
|
|
|
|
23rd July 2009, 00:45
|
#18
|
Established Member
Join Date: Apr 2006
Location: torquay (England)
Posts: 1,993
Car(s): supercharged vts. 1.1 saxo. accord type r
|
Quote:
Originally Posted by Raz
I have read somewhere that the VTR engine has been restricted alot due to the performance being close the the VTS, thus meaning more poeple would buy the VTR to the VTS which Citreon didnt want to happen - hence the restrictions.
Not sure if the story totally true, but that what I read and cant remember for the life of me where I read it!
|
gmc web sight says this about the vtr m8
__________________
vts, the futures bright the futures boost
Quote:
Originally Posted by sliderz
your car wipes mine out , any day . looking good
|
Quote:
Originally Posted by Sophia_Bush
lady charger ftw in this case
|
|
|
|
Posting Rules
|
You may not post new threads
You may not post replies
You may not post attachments
You may not edit your posts
HTML code is Off
|
|
|
All times are GMT. The time now is 02:59.
|