Rate this Entry

MrRem | NCAP got it right with the 106/Saxo

Submit "MrRem | NCAP got it right with the 106/Saxo" to StumbleUpon

Submit "MrRem | NCAP got it right with the 106/Saxo" to Digg

Submit "MrRem | NCAP got it right with the 106/Saxo" to Twitter

Posted 11th September 2008 at 16:51 by djrem
Updated 12th September 2008 at 15:02 by djrem

2 Stars.

Hit anything head on. fail.
You get Airbag face. fail
A smashed arm. fail
dislocated elbow. fail
And 3 days being cleaned by nurses. win.

[IMG]http://photos-e.ak.facebook.com/photos-ak-sf2p/v64/81/114/503085200/n503085200_66644_9930.jpg[/IMG]

Short and sweet.

£3,000 is best spent on a cheap new car than an expensive old one.

See too many chavs buying old M3s and wrecking them.

Stick to a Corsa young chap. Or a clio.
You live longer in them.

Posted in Uncategorized

Views 6473 Comments 5

« MrRem | Burning ginger kids smell like coconuts Main MrRem | Those that can't, Photoshop badly. »

Total Comments 5

Comments

	Ouch! Can't believe these cars are even sold looking at the safety rating
	Posted 11th September 2008 at 21:46 by MikeCracknell

	I hit a Renaul Clio head on. The combined speed was 80 mph. All be it both cars were written off, the Clio was still driveable.
	Posted 12th September 2008 at 14:48 by djrem

	I'm actually amazed that the car in the pic wasn't worse then that in a head on collision. An impact speed of 80mph and the driver survives in a saxo is pretty impressive But yes they got it right.
	Posted 21st September 2008 at 19:13 by shooorn94

	it was a combined speed of 40mph from both parties. Wasnt the most fun evening ive had tbh x
	Posted 26th September 2008 at 08:39 by djrem

	never even thought about the safety rating on my saxo before i bought it now im scared hha
	Posted 2nd August 2011 at 23:08 by Tomm911