Quote:
Originally Posted by RossDagley
Well we'll agree to disagree. You're wrong. You've missed the entire point. As I've explained several times, you've obtained that policy by committing fraud, so you're not insured at all. Good luck using ignorance as your excuse in court. It wont wash.  |
No no no no. Sorry buddy but like I say, which you don't seem to understand, is been a named driver on a Certificate of Motor Insurance entitles you to drive legally. There is no definition of a 'main driver' so you can not be convicted of fraud or driving with no insurance. Insurance companies can try scare you into thinking that been a named driver will not give you adequate cover, and obviously it works with some people like yourself and devil boy, but not with others.
Quote:
Originally Posted by RossDagley
You're the ONLY person that seem to think it's legal and not fraudulent. You've tried to dispute legitimate links I've posted by statements like "they're an income generating service" referring to the police. After all - what do the police know. They're only responsible for interpreting the laws we have to abide by...
|
I know at least 10 of my mates that also understand that been a named driver on an insurance policy is fully legal (I know that your basis of your argument is the 'main driver', but as there is no definition, our parents are 'main drivers' because they are older and wiser).
As for the police, they are there to generate income and uphold the law (priority in that order). Uphold the law means you have to break it (in their opinion, after gathering evidence) before they can bring a charge to take you to court. As you are breaking no offence by been a 'named driver' - you can not be charged (with the exception of clear deception, such as examples in the insurance run 'scarey' links).
Quote:
Originally Posted by RossDagley
When you post credible links yourself saying where it's legal to drive with a fraudulently obtained certificate of insurance
|
It is legal to drive a vehicle if you are a named driver on the policy and named on the 'Certificate of Motor Insurance' - even you arn't disputing this surely?? As for the 'main' or 'secondary' driver, there is no definition, so it is impossible to say who is who. Therefore, the cover is perfectly legal.
Quote:
Originally Posted by devilsadvocate
|
Never posted in that thread pal - must be other people that don't appreciate getting ripped off.
Like you say - we will agree to disagree. Let people make up their own mind
Threaded Mode